scholarly journals Mixture survival models methodology: an application to cancer immunotherapy assessment in clinical trials

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lizet Sanchez ◽  
Patricia Lorenzo-Luaces ◽  
Claudia Fonte ◽  
Agustin Lage

Abstract Progress in immunotherapy revolutionized the treatment landscape for advanced lung cancer, raising survival expectations beyond those that were historically anticipated with this disease. In the present study, we describe the methods for the adjustment of mixture parametric models of two populations for survival analysis in the presence of long survivors. A methodology is proposed in several five steps: first, it is proposed to use the multimodality test to decide the number of subpopulations to be considered in the model, second to adjust simple parametric survival models and mixture distribution models, to estimate the parameters and to select the best model fitted the data, finally, to test the hypotheses to compare the effectiveness of immunotherapies in the context of randomized clinical trials. The methodology is illustrated with data from a clinical trial that evaluates the effectiveness of the therapeutic vaccine CIMAvaxEGF vs the best supportive care for the treatment of advanced lung cancer. The mixture survival model allows estimating the presence of a subpopulation of long survivors that is 44% for vaccinated patients. The differences between the treated and control group were significant in both subpopulations (population of short-term survival: p = 0.001, the population of long-term survival: p = 0.0002). For cancer therapies, where a proportion of patients achieves long-term control of the disease, the heterogeneity of the population must be taken into account. Mixture parametric models may be more suitable to detect the effectiveness of immunotherapies compared to standard models.

Author(s):  
Kyoko Murase ◽  
Shuhei Moriguchi ◽  
Yui Takahashi ◽  
Kazumasa Ogawa ◽  
Sayaka Mochizuki ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Justyna Błach ◽  
Paweł Krawczyk ◽  
Juliusz Pankowski ◽  
Jarosław Buczkowski ◽  
Izabela Chmielewska ◽  
...  

IntroductionThe importance of modern treatments for the extension of overall survival in advanced lung cancer (LC) patients is rarely reported in clinical trials (crossover effect). Recent clinical trials have compared experimental treatment methods and shown that chemotherapy is no longer a comparator. We studied the relevance of innovative treatment to the extension of overall survival in Polish lung cancer patients.Material and methodsWe described the outcome in 1463 patients diagnosed and treated for advanced LC. The study included patients receiving all available forms of treatment, i.e. chemotherapy, immunotherapy, EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors, ALK inhibitors, and best supportive care (BSC).ResultsMedian OS (mOS) for the whole group of patients was 6.5 months. mOS was significantly higher in patients with SCC (8.0 months) and AC (7.0 months) compared to patients with SCLC (6 months) and NSCLC NOS (3.5 months). mOS was 30 months for EGFR TKI-treated patients, 34 months for patients receiving second-line immunotherapy, 8.5 months for chemotherapy patients, and 1.0 month for patients who received BSC. mOS for patients treated with ALK inhibitors and first-line immunotherapy was not reached. The use of targeted therapies or immunotherapies significantly (p < 0.0001) reduced the risk of death compared to chemotherapy (HR = 0.373, 95% CI: 0.288–0.484 and HR = 0.313, 95% CI: 0.255–0.385).ConclusionsThe use of modern therapies in one of the treatment lines compared to chemotherapy significantly increased the long-term survival of advanced LC patients (34.5 vs. 8.5 months, HR = 0.336, 95% CI: 0.284– 0.397, p < 0.0001). Correct and early LC diagnosis is required, because patients with late diagnosis have a particularly poor prognosis.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer S Davis ◽  
Erin Prophet ◽  
Ho-Lan Peng ◽  
Hwa Young Lee ◽  
Rebecca S S Tidwell ◽  
...  

Abstract Background New, effective treatments have resulted in long-term survival for small subgroups of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. However, knowledge of long-term survivor frequency and characteristics prior to modern therapies is lacking. Methods Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) patients with stage IV NSCLC diagnosed from 1991 to 2007 and followed through 2012 were dichotomized by survival time into the 10% who lived 21 months or longer (long-term survivors) vs the remaining 90% and compared with participants in a representative clinical trial of molecular profiling and targeted therapies (CUSTOM). Results Among the 44 387 SEER patients, the 10% identified as long-term survivors were distinguishable from the remaining 90% by younger age, female sex, Asian race, adenocarcinoma histology, tumor grade, tumor site, and surgery. From 1991–1994 to 2003–2007, median survival increased by 6 months from 30 to 36 months among long-term survivors but by only 1 month from 3 to 4 months among the remaining 90%. Among the 165 participants in the CUSTOM trial, 54% met our SEER criterion of long-term survival by living for 21 months or longer. Conclusions Among SEER patients with stage IV NSCLC, long-term survivors had a median survival approximately 10 times that of the remaining 90%. Long-term survivors accounted for more than one-half of the participants in a representative clinical trial. Caution is required when extrapolating the outcomes of participants in clinical trials to patients in routine clinical practice.


2018 ◽  
Vol 45 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 52-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lizet Sanchez ◽  
Leacky Muchene ◽  
Patricia Lorenzo-Luaces ◽  
Carmen Viada ◽  
Pedro C. Rodriguez ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 16 (7) ◽  
pp. A398
Author(s):  
L. Sánchez ◽  
P. Luaces ◽  
C. Viada ◽  
Y. Galan ◽  
J. Ballesteros ◽  
...  

1995 ◽  
Vol 110 (2) ◽  
pp. 386-395 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jakob R. Izbicki ◽  
Wolfram Trudo Knoefel ◽  
Bernward Passlick ◽  
Michael Habekost ◽  
Ortrud Karg ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document