Elevated-Temperature Caustic/Sandstone Interaction: Implications for Improving Oil Recovery (includes associated papers 11348 and 11548 )
Abstract Caustic in the form of sodium hydroxide solutions is shown to interact strongly with sandstone at elevated temperature ( 185 deg. F). Such interaction has substantial influence on the success of secondary and tertiary oil-recovery sodium hydroxide floods carried out in sandstone formations of more ordinary temperatures. Caustic in the form of sodium hydroxide interacts with sandstone at elevated temperature to promotesignificant dissolution of the more susceptible silicate minerals, predominantly clay and large-surface-area silicaminerals,sandstone weight loss;increased porosity;propagation of significant concentrations of water-soluble silicates, including sodium orthosilicate;in-situ formation of new immobile aluminosilicate material;changes in permeability: andhydroxideion consumption. Caustic/sandstone interaction resulting from sodiumhydroxide dissolution of silicate minerals is limited by kinetics. The interaction increases with increasing temperature, increasing sodium hydroxide concentration, and increasing caustic/sandstone contact time. Therate and the amount of interaction are sensitive to sandstone mineralogy and lithology. Although not studied during this work, the presence of crude oil, along with crude-oil type, may affect the rate and the amount of- interaction. Based on the laboratory study of elevated temperature caustic/sandstone interaction involving silicate-mineral dissolution by sodium hydroxide, it is concluded that, atlower temperatures, the much slower dissolution interaction has implications for field application of sodiumhydroxide for improving waterflood sweep efficiency and enhancing oil recover. Specifically, during field applications, the slow interaction could deplete the active hydroxide ions. More common low-temperature field applications are especially susceptible because oflong caustic/sandstone contact times and because, ingeneral, relatively small concentrations of sodiumhydroxide have been used historically. This study points out that proper extrapolation of laboratory caustic flooding results to field conditions should account for slow kinetic phenomena. The study also helps explaindetrimental caustic/sandstone interactions and lowerthan-expected oil recoveries experienced during a number of long-duration low-temperature enhanced oil recovery (EOR) field tests and floods. On the positive side, the dissolution interaction, especially at elevated temperatures, generates in-situ significant concentrations of water-soluble silicates, including sodium or thosilicate. Water-soluble silicates have been reported as candidates for improving oil recovery and for use in pre flushes to condition formations for other EOR techniques. Other than noting their in-situ formation and propagation, we did not study the alkaline water-soluble silicates in detail, and they are not discussed. Introduction Caustic (alkaline) flooding is one of several chemical processes for EOR being studied by the petroleum industry. Caustic flooding has been reviewed by Johnson and more recently by Mayer et al and Castor. Historically, caustic-induced EOR generally has been considered to result from liquid/liquid(caustic/crude)interactions. An exception to the liquid/liquid interaction generalization is caustic EOR postulated to result under certain conditions from wetting changes. In general, wetting changes involve very minor liquid/rock interactions limited in principle to the pore walls of formation material. Field results in sandstone formations for caustic EOR to date have not been overly encouraging. Liquid/rock(caustic/sandstone) interactions often appear to contribute negatively. Caustic is consumed by sandstone both reversibly and irreversibly. Reversible consumption leads to caustic propagation at a slower rate than the aqueous flood front. SPEJ P. 453^