A Numerical Simulation Comparison of Five-Spot vs. Line Drive in Micellar/Polymer Flooding

1982 ◽  
Vol 22 (01) ◽  
pp. 69-78
Author(s):  
H. Kazemi ◽  
D.J. MacMillan

Abstract The work presented in this paper was undertaken to study the effect of pattern configuration on oil recovery by the Maraflood oil-recovery process. The patterns studied are the five-spot and the 4 × 1 line drive. These patterns are obtained by placing infill wells in an existing 10-acre (40 469-m2) waterflooded five-spot pattern to obtain the 2.5-acre (10 117-m2) patterns. The number of infill wells is the same for both the new five-spot and new line-drive configurations and is about three times the number of existing wells. Both patterns have been used successfully in field applications by Marathon before this study. For instance, a line-drive pattern was used in Project 119-R and a five-spot pattern was used in Project 219-R. This work shows that the line drive produces more tertiary oil than the five-spot under otherwise identical reservoir conditions. Breakthrough times and oil rates for line-drive production wells are nearly the same. Meanwhile, five-spot production wells have vastly differing oil breakthrough times and oil rates. Both of the latter effects result from a nonuniform distribution of waterflood residual oil saturation in the field. Our study also shows that if producing wells in each line-drive row are connected by a perfect vertical fracture and if the same is true of the injection wells, the line-drive efficiency will improve very little. Introduction The Maraflood oil-recovery process is a viable enhanced oil-recovery technique. An appraisal of this process and other surfactant-enhanced oil-recovery schemes was reported by Gogarty. Three significant field tests of the Maraflood process were reported by Earlougher et al. In addition, a large-scale field application of this process was presented recently by Howell et al. in field applications of the Maraflood process, both line-drive and five-spot configurations have been used. In our field experience, an existing five-spot waterflood pattern is convened to another five-spot or 4 × 1 line-drive configuration by adding infill wells. The new five-spot or line-drive pattern has an area-per-well spacing of one-fourth of the original waterflood spacing. In practice, the number of infill wells required for both cases is somewhat greater than three times the number of existing wells. As the total number of wells increases, this ratio approaches the theoretical limit of three. In addition to the preceding arrangements of infill wells, many others are possible. In some arrangements, fewer infill wells are required than in our five-spot and 4 × 1 line drive. In such cases, the area per well increases, which generally causes these problems:required injectivity per injection well increases and may not be attainable because of the high viscosity of the injected fluids andthe breakthrough time is delayed. As an example, consider the case where no infill wells are drilled. In addition to the two problems just listed, the micellar/polymer flooding scheme will sweep only those regions that already have been swept well by the waterflood. The regions left unswept by the waterflood also will be left essentially unswept by the micellar/polymer flood. This means that a substantial amount of oil is left in place. Therefore, these types of undesired patterns were not considered in this study. Patterns with more infill wells than those in this study were not considered because of current economic limitations. Because of the likelihood of economic and technical merits, we also considered the placement of long vertical fractures to connect existing waterflood wells in place of infill wells. The fractures were arranged to form a more effective line drive. We emphasize that the patterns studied in this paper are those usually used in micellar/polymer flooding applications. Muskat has reported breakthrough waterflood sweep efficiencies of 72% and 88% for five-spot and 4 × 1 line drive patterns when the mobility ratio is unity. Muskat's results are for ideal plug flow displacement of red water by blue water in a perfectly homogeneous reservoir. SPEJ P. 69^

Geofluids ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-16
Author(s):  
Chen Sun ◽  
Hu Guo ◽  
Yiqiang Li ◽  
Kaoping Song

Recently, there are increasing interests in chemical enhanced oil recovery (EOR) especially surfactant-polymer (SP) flooding. Although alkali-surfactant-polymer (ASP) flooding can make an incremental oil recovery factor (IORF) of 18% original oil in place (OOIP) according to large-scale field tests in Daqing, the complex antiscaling and emulsion breaking technology as well as potential environment influence makes some people turn to alkali-free SP flooding. With the benefit of high IORF in laboratory and no scaling issue to worry, SP flooding is theoretically better than ASP flooding when high quality surfactant is available. Many SP flooding field tests have been conducted in China, where the largest chemical flooding application is reported. 10 typical large-scale SP flooding field tests were critically reviewed to help understand the benefit and challenge of SP flooding in low oil price era. Among these 10 field tests, only one is conducted in Daqing Oilfield, although ASP flooding has entered the commercial application stage since 2014. 2 SP tests are conducted in Shengli Oilfield. Both technical and economic parameters are used to evaluate these tests. 2 of these ten tests are very successful; the others were either technically or economically unsuccessful. Although laboratory tests showed that SP flooding can attain IORF of more than 15%, the average predicted IORF for these 10 field tests was 12% OOIP. Only two SP flooding tests in (SP 1 in Liaohe and SP 7 in Shengli) were reported actual IORF higher than 15% OOIP. The field test in Shengli was so successful that many enlarged field tests and industrial applications were carried out, which finally lead to a commercial application of SP flooding in 2008. However, other SP projects are not documented except two (SP7 and SP8). SP flooding tests in low permeability reservoirs were not successful due to high surfactant adsorption. It seems that SP flooding is not cost competitive as polymer flooding and ASP flooding if judged by utility factor (UF) and EOR cost. Even the most technically and economically successful SP1 has a much higher cost than polymer flooding and ASP flooding, SP flooding is thus not cost competitive as previously expected. The cost of SP flooding can be as high as ASP flooding, which indicates the importance of alkali. How to reduce surfactant adsorption in SP flooding is very important to cost reduction. It is high time to reevaluate the potential and suitable reservoir conditions for SP flooding. The necessity of surfactant to get ultra-low interfacial tension for EOR remains further investigation. This paper provides the petroleum industry with hard-to-get valuable information.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sudad H Al-Obaidi ◽  
Guliaeva NI ◽  
Khalaf FH

Most of the liquid oil of all types estimated today represents the category of heavy-oils. This leads to decrease in oil production and more extraction of water. Enhanced oil recovery is a method using sophisticated techniques that can deal with such sort of oils and alter the original properties of oil. Thermal Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) remains the most frequently used method for extraction of heavy oils. In this work, irreversible changesin rocks that lead to an increase in formation permeability have been studied and, as a result, to an increase in the production flow rate of production wells and for injection wells, an increase in their injectivity. New methods and technologies have been developed for the intensification of thermocyclic well treatments.A computer program based on mathematical model was developed, which allows predicting changes occurring in the well and near the well space. In this model, the main characteristics of the process of cyclic thermal impact on the bottom-hole zone can be used to predict field temperatures in the well and in the formation, as well as changes in the permeability of rocks. To improve the efficiency use of the model and increase the heating zone, a new method of thermal cycling impact on the bottom-hole zone of the well was developed.


Author(s):  
Sampson, Ibinye E. ◽  
Akpabio, Julius U. ◽  
Anyadiagwu, Charles I.

The instability of crude oil prices at the international market which results in revenue drop to oil and gas operators, the high cost of drilling multiple injection wells and installing gas reinjection systems in a bid to improve recovery of crude oil, have been of great concern to the Petroleum Industry. The Economic viability of Gas Reinjection for Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) (as against the gas flaring operation) was analyzed with 7 wells located onshore, in the Niger Delta region of Nigeria. The production history and reservoir data were gathered with which the cost analyses were conducted. Two scenarios involving seven production wells were evaluated. The first was converting two of the production wells to gas injection wells and producing from the remaining 5 production wells (IN2PROD5) and the other was injecting gas in two newly drilled injection wells and producing from the seven production wells (INJ2PROD7). It was shown that (INJ2PROD5) is a preferred option in extending the productive life of an otherwise depleted and uneconomic oilfield, having higher Net Present Value (NPV), Profitability Index (PI) and Internal Rate of Return (IRR) of -$53MM, 0.93 and 27.40% while the INJ2PROD7 had $161MM, 1.39 and 37.75% at discounted rate of 30% respectively. After subjecting the expected net revenues under various crude oil price sensitivity market vagaries, INJ2PROD5 will stand the test of time as it is less expensive and yielded a higher gross profit which is the major factor in any investment decision making.


Author(s):  
D.Zh. Akhmed-Zaki ◽  
T.S. Imankulov ◽  
B. Matkerim ◽  
B.S. Daribayev ◽  
K.A. Aidarov ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. 169-178
Author(s):  
Xiangguo LU ◽  
Bao CAO ◽  
Kun XIE ◽  
Weijia CAO ◽  
Yigang LIU ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document