Identifying the Root Cause of a Deepwater GoM Infant Sand Control Failure

2004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Craig Stair ◽  
Paul Morphy ◽  
Simon Chipperfield ◽  
Stephan Harris ◽  
Dean ONeal ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahdi Mahmoudi ◽  
Morteza Roostaei ◽  
Vahidoddin Fattahpour ◽  
Colby Sutton ◽  
Brent Fermaniuk ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Neeraj Gupta

There is no assurance that an organiation will achieve their business goals as various factors which may be internal or external determines the success. Most of the time enterprise risk management is seen as compliance requirement. The root cause analysis reports of some the recent disasters in energy industry also point towards this by stating that risk control failure is one of the primary reason. It means companies energy companies spend significant time on developing risk registers and governance framework but lack a robust day to day monitoring and integrated reporting & alerts framework. The ultimate objective of any risk control framework is to eliminate or reducethe likelihood of a triggering event, avoid black swans and monitor key risk indices in real time to avoid surprises. This paper looks at the energy companies operating in India for some of the key reasons for not having an enterprise wide risk control & monitoring framework and provides a methodology on how it can be developed.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Mahmoudi ◽  
V. Fattahpour ◽  
M. Roostaei ◽  
O. Kotb ◽  
C. Wang ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
Ashutosh Dikshit ◽  
Amrendra Kumar ◽  
Michael Langlais ◽  
Balkrishna Gadiyar ◽  
Glenn Woiceshyn ◽  
...  

Summary For offshore wells requiring sand control, it is beneficial to extend the openhole length to access more reserves with a reduced well count. In challenging environments (e.g., low fracture pressure, highly unconsolidated sand), gravel packing with shunt tubes has been used successfully to virtually ensure a complete pack, thereby minimizing the risk of sand-control failure. Although shunt-tubegravel-pack technologies already exist, several issues must be addressed to gravel pack longer wells. First, the extra volume of gravel passing through shunt-tube manifolds raises erosion concerns. Second, the burst rating of the entire shunt system needs to be increased to allow continuous packing through shunts in a heel-to-toe fashion. Third, higher leakoff through the packed interval might increase gravel concentration, which increases friction and the risk of bridging inside the shunts. This study discusses the development and testing of a modified shunted screen that could extend openhole gravel-packing lengths to more than 7,000 ft with zonal isolation. The first step was to use computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations to investigate the erosion-prone areas in our existing conventional shunted-screen-technology (SST) manifold design. The CFD results were then used to modify the manifold and make it more resistant to erosion. Prototypes were manufactured and erosion tests were conducted to validate and qualify the new design for targeted proppant concentrations, flow rates, and treatment volumes. Any weak areas found in the shunt system were modified to enable higher burst pressure. The modified shunt system was then independently tested to quantify the burst limits. The concerns regarding high leakoff, friction, and bridging inside the tubes were first addressed by means of experimentation. The first nozzle distance was then modified according to these results. Verification of the modified system design was performed by means of gravel-pack testing on a full-scale model. It was observed that the proposed enhanced-SST (ESST) had no erosion failure after 450,000 lbm of proppant at a slurry rate of 5 bbl/min. The proposed ESST was successfully tested for 10,000-psi burst pressure after the erosion test. The initial motivation, design changes, and tests that led to the development of the modified system are presented herein.


2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
George Colwart ◽  
Robert C. Burton ◽  
Luke F. Eaton ◽  
Richard M. Hodge ◽  
Kenyon James Blake

2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (01) ◽  
pp. 144-156 ◽  
Author(s):  
George Colwart ◽  
Robert C. Burton ◽  
Luke F. Eaton ◽  
Richard M. Hodge ◽  
Kenyon J. Blake

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document