A Method for Estimating the Interporosity Flow Parameter in Naturally Fractured Reservoirs

1979 ◽  
Vol 19 (05) ◽  
pp. 324-332 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.O. Uldrich ◽  
Iraj Ershaghi

Abstract For naturally fractured reservoirs of the double-porosity type, Warren and Root defined two parameters characterizing such systems, F ft, and epsilon. While F ft may be obtained easily from the straight lines of the buildup or drawdown plot, no explicit method for estimating epsilon was plot, no explicit method for estimating epsilon was suggested in the original paper.This paper presents a method whereby the coordinates of the inflection point on a buildup or drawdown plot may be used to estimate epsilon. We show that for pressure drawdown tests, epsilon can be estimated under certain conditions, while for pressure buildup tests, only the ratio of the interporosity flow parameter to the total system porosity/compressibility parameter to the total system porosity/compressibility product, epsilon/[(phi ct)f + (phi Ct)ma], is obtained. product, epsilon/[(phi ct)f + (phi Ct)ma], is obtained. By using the concept of inflection points, an equation is derived where F ft may be obtained from a pressure buildup or drawdown test when no early- or late-time data are available. Introduction Warren and Root presented a solution to the problem of radial flow of a slightly compressible problem of radial flow of a slightly compressible fluid in a naturally fractured reservoir. They assumed that flow occurs only in the fractures and that the matrix blocks, assembled as a uniformly distributed source, deliver the fluid to the fracture system. They characterized such a system by two parameters related to the properties of the reservoir. One of these parameters, the fluid capacitance coefficient, F ft, parameters, the fluid capacitance coefficient, F ft, is used to represent the ratio of the porosity/ compressibility product for the fractures to that for the entire system: (phi ct)f/[(phi ct)f + (phi ct)ma]. The second parameter, epsilon, is defined as the interporosity flow parameter, which indicates the degree of interporosity flow between the matrix blocks and the fracture system. As shown by Kazemi, the fluid capacitance coefficient may be obtained from the following equation: F ft = antilog (-delta p/m)...................(1) where, delta p = vertical separation of the two straight lines on a buildup or drawdown test plot, psi (kPa); and m = slope of the straight lines on a buildup or drawdown test plot, psi/cycle (kPa/cycle). While the computation of F ft from this equation is straight-forward, no clear method of finding epsilon has yet been proposed. In the original paper, Warren and Root did not elaborate on a suitable method for the determination of epsilon. Kazemi discussed the use of interference test data to find the total system porosity/compressibility product, (phi ct) f + (phi ct)ma. Using this information, a trial-and-error procedure may be applied to the pressure buildup equation procedure may be applied to the pressure buildup equation to obtain a satisfactory answer for epsilon. The optimum epsilon was defined as the value resulting in the best curve fit of the theoretical equations to the field data. SPEJ p. 324

1998 ◽  
Vol 1 (02) ◽  
pp. 141-147 ◽  
Author(s):  
Faruk Civan

Abstract A generalized formulation of the Buckley-Leverett displacement in naturally fractured porous media and an efficient solution by the method of differential quadrature and cubature for waterflooding are presented. Introduction Waterflooding is one of the economically viable techniques for recovery of additional oil following the primary recovery. However, the applications to naturally fractured reservoirs have certain challenges that arise concerning the prediction of oil recovery. Waterflooding in clayey formations involves the adverse effects of formation damage which can reduce its efficiency. The characterization of naturally fractured porous formations still needs further research. The process of matrix-to-fracture transfer of oil by imbibition of water is not well understood. It is still not clear which modeling approach amongst the various alternatives would accurately describe the mechanism of oil recovery and flow of fluids in naturally fractured formations. Numerous publications dealing with recovery of oil from reservoirs have appeared in the literature. By-and-large the modeling approaches proposed in most of these publications are highly computationally intensive or impractical for large field scale applications. Therefore, in search of a more practical approach, Kazemi et al have adopted the modeling approach by deSwaan and have demonstrated that the deSwaan approach provides certain advantages over the everpopular multiple porosity approaches reported in various publications. Basically, deSwaan's approach is a representative volume averaged description of the immiscible displacement process in fractured porous media. In this approach, deSwaan represented the matrix to fracture oil transport via a source term added to the conventional Buckley-Leverett equation by an empirical function given by Aronofsky, et al. Kazemi et al modified this function into a multi-parameter empirical function. Subsequently, Civan theoretically derived a similar function with only two parameters based on a hypothetical mechanism of oil transfer from matrix to fracture. The primary advantage of Civan's theoretical model is the reduction of the number of empirical constants while providing insight into the mechanism of oil transfer from matrix to fracture by imbibition of water. The two constants in Civan's model are considered as being representative volumetric average parameters. The values of these parameters depend on various conditions including


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document