Horizontal-Wellbore Stability and Sand Production in Weakly Consolidated Sandstones

2000 ◽  
Vol 15 (04) ◽  
pp. 274-283 ◽  
Author(s):  
P.J. van den Hoek ◽  
A.P. Kooijman ◽  
P. de Bree ◽  
C.J. Kenter ◽  
Z. Zheng ◽  
...  
1996 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.P. Kooijman ◽  
P.J. van den Hoek ◽  
Ph. de Bree ◽  
C.J. Kenter ◽  
Z. Zheng ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 78 (3) ◽  
pp. 177-191 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Gentzis ◽  
Nathan Deisman ◽  
Richard J. Chalaturnyk

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bailin Wu ◽  
Nulwhoffal Mohamed ◽  
Chee Phuat Tan ◽  
Md. Wakif Sukahar ◽  
Teh Yat Hong ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Husam H. Alkinani ◽  
Abo Taleb T. Al-Hameedi ◽  
Shari Dunn-Norman ◽  
Munir Aldin ◽  
Deepak Gokaraju ◽  
...  

AbstractElastic moduli such as Young’s modulus (E), Poisson’s ratio (v), and bulk modulus (K) are vital to creating geomechanical models for wellbore stability, hydraulic fracturing, sand production, etc. Due to the difficulty of obtaining core samples and performing rock testing, alternatively, wireline measurements can be used to estimate dynamic moduli. However, dynamic moduli are significantly different from elastic moduli due to many factors. In this paper, correlations for three zones (Nahr Umr shale, Zubair shale, and Zubair sandstone) located in southern Iraq were created to estimate static E, K, and ν from dynamic data. Core plugs from the aforementioned three zones alongside wireline measurements for the same sections were acquired. Single-stage triaxial (SST) tests with CT scans were executed for the core plugs. The data were separated into two parts; training (70%), and testing (30%) to ensure the models can be generalized to new data. Regularized ridge regression models were created to estimate static E, K, and ν from dynamic data (wireline measurements). The shrinkage parameter (α) was selected for each model based on an iterative process, where the goal is to ensure having the smallest error. The results showed that all models had testing R2 ranging between 0.92 and 0.997 and consistent with the training results. All models of E, K, and ν were linear besides ν for the Zubair sandstone and shale which were second-degree polynomial. Furthermore, root means squared error (RMSE) and mean absolute error (MAE) were utilized to assess the error of the models. Both RMSE and MAE were consistently low in training and testing without a large discrepancy. Thus, with the regularization of ridge regression and consistent low error during the training and testing, it can be concluded that the proposed models can be generalized to new data and no overfitting can be observed. The proposed models for Nahr Umr shale, Zubair shale, and Zubair sandstone can be utilized to estimate E, K, and ν based on readily available dynamic data which can contribute to creating robust geomechanical models for hydraulic fracturing, sand production, wellbore stability, etc.


2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.. Hegazy ◽  
M.R.. R. Lakshmikantha

Abstract The E&P industry all over the world is awakening to the new technology discipline of Geomechanics, recognizing its importance in every operation of hydrocarbons exploitation, from drilling to production. There are specific applications in the early stage of exploitation, e.g. with respect to wellbore stability, sand production, hydraulic fracturing, traversing depleted zones, characterization of fractures and fault sealing capacity. In the later stages of production it can better characterize reservoir subsidence and fracture behavior with pressure evolution. A rigorous application of these methods can add important value to E&P projects. The need for innovative ways to solve the technology challenges planted the seeds of Geomechanics to germinate and grow as a key technology in E&P industry with applications for present and future projects. The vision for the future of this emerging discipline is bright with strong growth in applications. It is especially relevant to meet the challenges posed by many new discoveries, especially unconventional plays, which are often difficult to develop profitably. Geomechanics creates opportunities for improved and integrated project management. It can offer a variety of solutions by integrating conventional E&P technologies with cutting edge numerical, mathematical models that impacts the reservoir production behavior. Major operators were the first to embrace the scientific use of Geomechanics to help develop difficult reservoirs profitably. Also, a few medium-sized oil companies have recognized this potential and, as a consequence, have created Geomechanics teams with in. In this article, the authors provide a bird's eye view of Geomechanics as a core E&P technology supporting mega E&P projects. We discuss the current state of the art of this technology, with special emphasis on applications.


2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Osmar Rene Alcalde ◽  
Cem Ozan ◽  
Gerardo Jimenez Malpica ◽  
Luis Alejandro Perez Suarez ◽  
Jose Alvarellos ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 36-53
Author(s):  
Hussein Saeed Almalikee ◽  
Fahad M. Al-Najm

Directional and horizontal wellbore profiles and optimization of trajectory to minimizeborehole problems are considered the most important part in well planning and design. Thisstudy introduces four types of directional and horizontal wells trajectory plans for Rumailaoilfield by selecting the suitable kick off point (KOP), build section, drop section andhorizontal profile. In addition to the optimized inclination and orientation which wasselected based on Rumaila oilfield geomechanics and wellbore stability analysis so that theoptimum trajectory could be drilled with minimum wellbore instability problems. The fourrecommended types of deviated wellbore trajectories include: Type I (also called Build andHold Trajectory or L shape) which target shallow to medium reservoirs with lowinclination (20o) and less than 500m step out, Type II (S shape) that can be used topenetrate far off reservoir vertically, Type III (also called Deep Kick off wells or J shape)these wells are similar to the L shape profile except the kickoff point is at a deeper depth,and design to reach far-off targets (>500m step out) with more than 30o inclination, andfinally Type IV (horizontal) that penetrates the reservoir horizontally at 90o. The study alsorecommended the suitable drilling mud density that can control wellbore failure for the fourtypes of wellbore trajectory.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document