Use of Full-Field Simulation to Design a Miscible CO2 Flood

1999 ◽  
Vol 2 (03) ◽  
pp. 230-237 ◽  
Author(s):  
F.P. Brinkman ◽  
T.V. Kane ◽  
R.R. McCullough ◽  
J.W. Miertschin

Summary A study using full-field reservoir modeling optimized the design of a miscible CO2 flood project for the Sharon Ridge Canyon Unit. The study began with extensive data gathering in the field and building a full-field three-dimensional geologic model. A full-field simulation model with relatively coarse gridding was subsequently built and used to history match the waterflood. This waterflood model highlighted areas in the field with current high oil saturations as priority targets for CO2 flooding and generated a forecast of reserves from continued waterflooding. Predictions for the CO2 flood used an in-house four-component simulator (stock tank oil, solution gas, water, CO2. A full-field CO2 model with more finely gridded patterns was built using oil saturations and pressures at the end of history in the waterflood model. The CO2 model identified the best patterns for CO2 flooding and was instrumental in selecting a strategy for sizing the initial flood area and in determining the size, location, and timing of future expansions of the CO2 flood. Introduction The Sharon Ridge Canyon Unit (SRCU) is located in West Texas, about 70 miles northeast of the city of Midland. The Unit covers 13,712 acres. Fig. 1 shows the Horseshoe Atoll, a trend of more than 40 oil fields covering several West Texas counties. SRCU is geologically continuous with the Diamond M Unit and the giant Kelly-Snyder Field (SACROC Unit) to the northeast. Production is from the Canyon Reef formation, a thick carbonate buildup of late Pennsylvanian Canyon and Cisco age, and occurs at an average depth of 6600 feet. There are active CO2 floods in this formation at SACROC, Reinecke, and the Salt Creek field. Sharon Ridge was discovered in 1949 and developed on 40 acre spacing by 1953 with about 340 wells. The reservoir initially contained undersaturated oil at 3135 psi. Production was by expansion drive until 1952 when pressure fell below the bubble point of 1850 psi over most of the field. In 1955, the field was unitized and a peripheral waterflood was started to stabilize reservoir pressure. The waterflood is now at a mature stage with oil recovery approaching 50% of the original oil-in-place (OOIP). There has been limited infill drilling with 22 wells drilled at 20-acre spacing. Screening studies identified SRCU as a good candidate for a miscible CO2 flood project. These studies included core flood displacements, pattern element simulation models, and detailed evaluations of similar fields with CO2 floods. Laboratory core displacements showed a remaining oil to waterflood of over 40% with subsequent injection of CO2 reducing oil saturation to less than 10%. Simulations with small element models have also shown significant incremental oil recovery from injection of CO2 at SRCU. SRCU has reservoir properties similar to SACROC which has reported significant additional oil recovery from miscible CO2 flooding (Ref. 1). The goal of full-field modeling was to design a miscible CO2 flood with maximum economic potential. Key issues for project design include the amount and location of remaining oil, reservoir sweep efficiency, flood rate, gas injection volume, strategy for handling increased produced gas, and projection of continued secondary operations. To address these issues, we built three different full-field three-dimensional (3D) models: geologic model, coarse-grid waterflood model, and fine-grid CO2 flood model. Recent advances in computer technology made this approach possible as opposed to the prior approach of running type-element models and scaling up those results to field rates. The approach of using field-scale simulation models to study optimizations for another CO2 flood in West Texas has been reported in Ref. 2. Thus, advancing technology and prior experience led us to embark on this ambitious approach to use full-field modeling to design our CO2 flood. Geologic Modeling Geology. The reservoir is a thick carbonate buildup that is predominately limestone. Fig. 2 shows the structure on the top of the reservoir. Geographic areas of the field have been named: North End, South End, and Southeast Pinnacle. The topography is extremely variable, with the hydrocarbon column averaging 115 feet and ranging to a maximum of 450 feet in the South End area of the field. A large portion of the North End has over 90 feet of gross reservoir thickness above the original oil-water contact. Table 1 is a summary of reservoir rock and fluid properties. The reservoir has been subdivided into five depositional sequences or zones, four of which are shown in Fig. 3. The lower zones (4, 5) are found over almost the entire field while upper zones (1, 2, 3) are more areally restricted. Zones are usually separated by intervals of low porosity limestone with few shales in the reservoir. Most wells drilled during initial field development did not penetrate the entire reservoir, thus limiting description of the lower zones. A more detailed discussion of the geologic setting and depositional facies is available in Ref. 3. Model Design. Building a full-field 3D geologic model of SRCU presented several unique challenges, including having modern porosity logs on only a few wells and only 90 full penetrations of the reservoir. To address this problem of limited data, an extensive data acquisition program was implemented. This program included deepening 19 wells, coring 11 wells, and obtaining 49 miles of new two-dimensional (2D) seismic lines. After gathering these data, all new and old core, well log, and seismic data were integrated to develop a sequence stratigraphic reservoir framework.

Energies ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. 2130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gang Hu ◽  
Pengchun Li ◽  
Linzi Yi ◽  
Zhongxian Zhao ◽  
Xuanhua Tian ◽  
...  

In this paper, the immiscible water-alternating-CO2 flooding process at the LH11-1 oilfield, offshore Guangdong Province, was firstly evaluated using full-field reservoir simulation models. Based on a 3D geological model and oil production history, 16 scenarios of water-alternating-CO2 injection operations with different water alternating gas (WAG) ratios and slug sizes, as well as continuous CO2 injection (Con-CO2) and primary depletion production (No-CO2) scenarios, have been simulated spanning 20 years. The results represent a significant improvement in oil recovery by CO2 WAG over both Con-CO2 and No-CO2 scenarios. The WAG ratio and slug size of water affect the efficiency of oil recovery and CO2 injection. The optimum operations are those with WAG ratios lower than 1:2, which have the higher ultimate oil recovery factor of 24%. Although WAG reduced the CO2 injection volume, the CO2 storage efficiency is still high, more than 84% of the injected CO2 was sequestered in the reservoir. Results indicate that the immiscible water-alternating-CO2 processes can be optimized to improve significantly the performance of pressure maintenance and oil recovery in offshore reef heavy-oil reservoirs significantly. The simulation results suggest that the LH11-1 field is a good candidate site for immiscible CO2 enhanced oil recovery and storage for the Guangdong carbon capture, utilization and storage (GDCCUS) project.


1982 ◽  
Vol 22 (06) ◽  
pp. 805-815 ◽  
Author(s):  
William F. Yellig

Yellig, William F., SPE, Amoco Production Co. Abstract This paper presents results of an extensive study to understand CO2 displacement of Levelland (TX) reservoir oil. The work was conducted to support Levelland CO2 pilots currently in progress. Experimental displacement tests were conducted at various pressures, core lengths, and CO2 frontal advance rates. The experimental system included a novel analytical technique to obtain effluent compositional profiles within the oil-moving zone at test conditions. The results of this study show that at pressures greater than the CO2 minimum miscibility pressure (MMP), a multicontact miscible displacement mechanism predominates. Miscibility is developed in situ by vaporization or extraction-type mass transfer. The laboratory lengths required for CO2 to develop miscibility and exhibit miscible displacement efficiency were found dependent on the phase equilibria of the CO2/Levelland oil system. Displacements requiring the greatest length to develop miscibility were at pressures where single-contact mixtures of CO2 and Levelland oil form two liquid phases. A companion paper demonstrates the use of the analytical technique developed in this study to obtain process data from a CO2 field pilot test. In addition, the mechanistic information obtained from this study is used to interpret the process data from the pilot test. The results have application to other reservoir oils whose phase equilibria with CO2 are similar to the CO2/ Levelland oil system. Introduction Miscible CO2 flooding is developing rapidly as a commercial enhanced oil-recovery process. The successful design and interpretation of CO2 pilot tests and fieldwide floods are dependent on a good knowledge of the reservoir and the CO2 displacement process. The overall CO2 displacement process is shown schematically in Fig. 1. The main focus of this study concerned the oil moving zone (OMZ) and particularly the mechanisms by which this zone formed and by which CO2 displaced Levelland oil. Levelland oil was chosen because it is typical of many west Texas reservoir oils being considered for CO2 flooding. In addition, the CO2 pilot tests currently conducted in the Levelland field provide a direct application of this research. Several authors have discussed the displacement of reservoir oil by CO2. These discussions have centered around three primary displacement mechanisms: immiscible, multicontact or developed miscible, and contact miscible. In addition, two basic types of mass transfer have been postulated as responsible for the development of miscibility in a multicontact process: transfer of hydrocarbons from the in-place oil to the displacing CO2 (i.e., vaporization or extraction) and transfer of CO2 to the in-place oil (i.e., condensation). Vaporization and extraction are the same basic mass-transfer process. Vaporization refers to mass transfer from a liquid oil phase to a CO2-rich vapor phase and extraction refers to mass transfer from a liquid oil phase to a CO2-rich liquid phase. The distinction between vaporization and extraction is somewhat arbitrary in describing the CO2 process since it reflects the types of phases present only on first contact. One purpose of this paper is to present results of a comprehensive study to determine the mechanism by which CO2 displaces Levelland oil at reservoir conditions. SPEJ P. 805^


2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 342-350 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Vakil ◽  
Arash Olyaei ◽  
Sheldon I. Green

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (7) ◽  
pp. eabd2711
Author(s):  
Jean-François Louf ◽  
Nancy B. Lu ◽  
Margaret G. O’Connell ◽  
H. Jeremy Cho ◽  
Sujit S. Datta

Hydrogels hold promise in agriculture as reservoirs of water in dry soil, potentially alleviating the burden of irrigation. However, confinement in soil can markedly reduce the ability of hydrogels to absorb water and swell, limiting their widespread adoption. Unfortunately, the underlying reason remains unknown. By directly visualizing the swelling of hydrogels confined in three-dimensional granular media, we demonstrate that the extent of hydrogel swelling is determined by the competition between the force exerted by the hydrogel due to osmotic swelling and the confining force transmitted by the surrounding grains. Furthermore, the medium can itself be restructured by hydrogel swelling, as set by the balance between the osmotic swelling force, the confining force, and intergrain friction. Together, our results provide quantitative principles to predict how hydrogels behave in confinement, potentially improving their use in agriculture as well as informing other applications such as oil recovery, construction, mechanobiology, and filtration.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document