A Unified Mechanistic Model for Steady-State Two-Phase Flow in Wellbores and Pipelines

1999 ◽  
Author(s):  
L.E. Gomez ◽  
O. Shoham ◽  
Z. Schmidt ◽  
R.N. Chokshi ◽  
A. Brown ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Steady State ◽  
Two Phase Flow ◽  
Mechanistic Model ◽  
Phase Flow ◽  
Two Phase

scholarly journals An Explicit Analytical Solution for Transient Two-Phase Flow in Inclined Fluid Transmission Lines

Fluids ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (9) ◽  
pp. 300
Author(s):  
Taoufik Wassar ◽  
Matthew A. Franchek ◽  
Hamdi Mnasri ◽  
Yingjie Tang
Keyword(s):  
Steady State ◽  
Analytical Model ◽  
Transmission Lines ◽  
Single Phase ◽  
Flow Model ◽  
Two Phase Flow ◽  
Mechanistic Model ◽  
Phase Flow ◽  
Single Phase Flow ◽  
Two Phase

Due to the complex nonlinearity characteristics, analytical modeling of compressible flow in inclined transmission lines remains a challenge. This paper proposes an analytical model for one-dimensional flow of a two-phase gas-liquid fluid in inclined transmission lines. The proposed model is comprised of a steady-state two-phase flow mechanistic model in-series with a dynamic single-phase flow model. The two-phase mechanistic model captures the steady-state pressure drop and liquid holdup properties of the gas-liquid fluid. The developed dynamic single-phase flow model is an analytical model comprised of rational polynomial transfer functions that are explicitly functions of fluid properties, line geometry, and inclination angle. The accuracy of the fluid resonant frequencies predicted by the transient flow model is precise and not a function of transmission line spatial discretization. Therefore, model complexity is solely a function of the number of desired modes. The dynamic single-phase model is applicable for under-damped and over-damped systems, laminar, and turbulent flow conditions. The accuracy of the overall two-phase flow model is investigated using the commercial multiphase flow dynamic code OLGA. The mean absolute error between the two models in step response overshoot and settling time is less than 8% and 2 s, respectively.

Unified Mechanistic Model for Steady-State Two-Phase Flow: Horizontal to Vertical Upward Flow

SPE Journal ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 5 (03) ◽  
pp. 339-350 ◽  
Author(s):  
L.E. Gomez ◽  
Ovadia Shoham ◽  
Zelimir Schmidt ◽  
R.N. Chokshi ◽  
Tor Northug
Keyword(s):  
Steady State ◽  
Two Phase Flow ◽  
Mechanistic Model ◽  
Phase Flow ◽  
Upward Flow ◽  
Two Phase

Analysis of Transient Two-Phase Flow in Pressure Safety Valve Outlet Headers

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maral Taghva ◽  
Lars Damkilde
Keyword(s):  
Steady State ◽  
Shock Waves ◽  
High Speed ◽  
Two Phase Flow ◽  
Safety Valve ◽  
Strong Shock ◽  
Flow Property ◽  
Phase Flow ◽  
Transient Pressure ◽  
Two Phase

To protect a pressurized system from overpressure, one of the most established strategies is to install a Pressure Safety Valve (PSV). Therefore, the excess pressure of the system is relieved through a vent pipe when PSV opens. The vent pipe is also called “PSV Outlet Header”. After the process starts, a transient two-phase flow is formed inside the outlet header consisting of high speed pressurized gas interacting with existing static air. The high-speed jet compresses the static air towards the end tail of the pipe until it is discharged to the ambiance and eventually, the steady state is achieved. Here, this transient process is investigated both analytically and numerically using the method of characteristics. Riemann’s solvers and Godunov’s method are utilized to establish the solution. Propagation of shock waves and flow property alterations are clearly demonstrated throughout the simulations. The results show strong shock waves as well as high transient pressure take place inside the outlet header. This is particularly important since it indicates the significance of accounting for shock waves and transient pressure, in contrast to commonly accepted steady state calculations. More precisely, shock waves and transient pressure could lead to failure, if the pipe thickness is chosen only based on conventional steady state calculations.

Experimental, Numerical, and Statistical Investigation of Two Phase Flow in a Cylindrical Perforation Tunnel

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ekhwaiter Abobaker ◽  
Abadelhalim Elsanoose ◽  
Mohammad Azizur Rahman ◽  
Faisal Khan ◽  
Amer Aborig ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Numerical Simulation ◽  
Steady State ◽  
Statistical Analysis ◽  
Flow Rate ◽  
Gas Flow ◽  
Two Phase Flow ◽  
Phase Flow ◽  
Gas Flow Rate ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Flow Through

Abstract Perforation is the final stage in well completion that helps to connect reservoir formations to wellbores during hydrocarbon production. The drilling perforation technique maximizes the reservoir productivity index by minimizing damage. This can be best accomplished by attaining a better understanding of fluid flows that occur in the near-wellbore region during oil and gas operations. The present work aims to enhance oil recovery by modelling a two-phase flow through the near-wellbore region, thereby expanding industry knowledge about well performance. An experimental procedure was conducted to investigate the behavior of two-phase flow through a cylindrical perforation tunnel. Statistical analysis was coupled with numerical simulation to expand the investigation of fluid flow in the near-wellbore region that cannot be obtained experimentally. The statistical analysis investigated the effect of several parameters, including the liquid and gas flow rate, liquid viscosity, permeability, and porosity, on the injection build-up pressure and the time needed to reach a steady-state flow condition. Design-Expert® Design of Experiments (DoE) software was used to determine the numerical simulation runs using the ANOVA analysis with a Box-Behnken Design (BBD) model and ANSYS-FLUENT was used to analyses the numerical simulation of the porous media tunnel by applying the volume of fluid method (VOF). The experimental data were validated to the numerical results, and the comparison of results was in good agreement. The numerical and statistical analysis demonstrated each investigated parameter’s effect. The permeability, flow rate, and viscosity of the liquid significantly affect the injection pressure build-up profile, and porosity and gas flow rate substantially affect the time required to attain steady-state conditions. In addition, two correlations obtained from the statistical analysis can be used to predict the injection build-up pressure and the required time to reach steady state for different scenarios. This work will contribute to the clarification and understanding of the behavior of multiphase flow in the near-wellbore region.

MicroCT X-Ray Imaging of Hydrodynamic Dispersion under Steady-State Two-Phase Flow

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Hasan ◽  
V. Joekar-Niasar ◽  
H. Steeb ◽  
N. Karadimitriou ◽  
J. Godinho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Steady State ◽  
Two Phase Flow ◽  
Hydrodynamic Dispersion ◽  
Phase Flow ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
X Ray ◽  
X Ray Imaging

Numerical and Mechanistic Modelling of Two-Phase Liquid-Gas Flow’s Pressure Drop Across Sharp-Edged Orifices

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zurwa Khan ◽  
Reza Tafreshi ◽  
Matthew Franchek ◽  
Karolos Grigoriadis
Keyword(s):  
Numerical Model ◽  
Pressure Drop ◽  
Relative Error ◽  
Two Phase Flow ◽  
Mechanistic Model ◽  
Gas Mixture ◽  
Phase Flow ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Pressure Drops ◽  
Phase Liquid

Abstract Pressure drop estimation across orifices for two-phase liquid-gas flow is essential to size valves and pipelines and decrease the probability of unsafe consequences or high costs in petroleum, chemical, and nuclear industries. While numerically modeling flow across orifices is a complex task, it can assess the effect of numerous orifice designs and operation parameters. In this paper, two-phase flow across orifices has been numerically modeled to investigate the effect of different fluid combinations and orifice geometries on pressure drop. The orifice is assumed to be located in a pipe with fully-developed upstream and downstream flow. Two liquid-gas fluid combinations, namely water-air, and gasoil liquid-gas mixture were investigated for different orifice to pipe area ratios ranging from 0.01 to 1 for the superficial velocity of 10 m/s. Volume of Fluid multiphase flow model along with k-epsilon turbulence model were used to estimate the pressure distribution of liquid-gas mixture along the pipe. The numerical model was validated for water-air with mean relative error less than 10.5%. As expected, a decrease in orifice to pipe area ratio resulted in larger pressure drops due to an increase in the contraction coefficients of the orifice assembly. It was also found that water-air had larger pressure drops relative to gasoil mixture due to larger vortex formation downstream of orifices. In parallel, a mechanistic model to directly estimate the local two-phase pressure drop across orifices was developed. The gas void fraction was predicted using a correlation by Woldesemayat and Ghajar, and applied to separated two-phase flow undergoing contraction and expansion due to an orifice. The model results were validated for different orifices and velocities, with the overall relative error of less than 40%, which is acceptable due to the uncertainties associated with measuring experimental pressure drop. Comparison of the developed numerical and mechanistic model showed that the numerical model is able to achieve a higher accuracy, while the mechanistic model requires minimal computation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document