Numerical Simulation of Oil Production With Simultaneous Ground Subsidence

1975 ◽  
Vol 15 (05) ◽  
pp. 411-424 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Finol ◽  
S.M. Farouq Ali

Abstract A two-phase, two-dimensional black oil simulator was developed for simulating reservoir production behavior with simultaneously occurring reservoir formation compaction and ground subsidence at the surface.The flow equations were solved by both alternating direction implicit procedure and strongly implicit procedure. Reservoir compaction was described on the basis of the experimental data reported. The magnitude of areal subsidence at the surface was calculated using reservoir compaction, utilizing the recently developed theory of poroelasticity. poroelasticity. Computer runs were used to generate a variety of data, such as reservoir Pressure variation with oil production, for different reservoir compaction production, for different reservoir compaction coefficients. It was found that the average reservoir pressure increased with the Compaction coefficient pressure increased with the Compaction coefficient for a given cumulative oil production.The model was used for generating the reservoir formation profiles, as well as the ground subsidence bowls for a variety of conditions. It was found that the subsidence behavior strongly depends on the depth of burial. For example, with an increase in the depth, the reservoir bottom surface may actually uplift, while the top surface subsides.The model was also used for studying the effect of subsidence on pressure buildup behavior. The calculated reservoir pressure was higher in a compacting than in a noncompacting reservoir, taking into account the variation of permeability with compaction.Another phase studied was the effect of rebound on reservoir performance when gas is injected into the formation. Even though rebound is small in practice (on the order of 10 percent of subsidence), practice (on the order of 10 percent of subsidence), the effect was clearly evident in the reservoir pressure-production behavior. However, when there pressure-production behavior. However, when there was no rebound, gas injection simply inhibited compaction.Finally, the model was used for simulating the reported oil production and subsidence history of one of the Bolivar Coast oil fields in the Western Venezuela. Fair agreement was obtained between the observed and the predicted behavior. Introduction The phenomenon of ground subsidence associated with production of oil or gas from underground hydrocarbon reservoirs is not common; however, it does present environmental problems in a few oil-producing areas around the world. Notable examples are the Wilmington oil field, below Long Beach, Calif. where almost 30 ft of subsidence have been recorded, and the oil fields near and under Lake Maracaibo in Venezuela, where the surface has subsided as much as 10 ft. Other cases have been reported in Harris County, Tex., in the Niigata district of Japan, and in the Po Delta in Italy.Numerous causes may give rise to ground subsidence, either natural or as a result of man's activities. However, as far as the problem at hand is concerned, the observed land subsidence is considered to be a result of reservoir compaction, resulting from pore pressure decline in reservoirs that meet certain specific geometrical and structural conditions. The changes in the petrophysical properties of reservoir rocks caused by compaction properties of reservoir rocks caused by compaction have been studied to some extent, as well as the influence of such changes on the fluid production behavior of the reservoir. However, very little has been accomplished in relating the compaction of the underground reservoir with the subsidence occurring at the surface. Among the few studies conducted on this problem, the most realistic are those that consider subsidence above a disk-shaped reservoir, in which a uniform pressure reduction has occurred. These studies do not simulate the fluid production behavior of the compacting reservoir as such; this is considered to be known and is used to determine the compaction of the reservoir and the accompanying subsidence. SPEJ P. 411

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammed Ahmed Al-Janabi ◽  
Omar F. Al-Fatlawi ◽  
Dhifaf J. Sadiq ◽  
Haider Abdulmuhsin Mahmood ◽  
Mustafa Alaulddin Al-Juboori

Abstract Artificial lift techniques are a highly effective solution to aid the deterioration of the production especially for mature oil fields, gas lift is one of the oldest and most applied artificial lift methods especially for large oil fields, the gas that is required for injection is quite scarce and expensive resource, optimally allocating the injection rate in each well is a high importance task and not easily applicable. Conventional methods faced some major problems in solving this problem in a network with large number of wells, multi-constrains, multi-objectives, and limited amount of gas. This paper focuses on utilizing the Genetic Algorithm (GA) as a gas lift optimization algorithm to tackle the challenging task of optimally allocating the gas lift injection rate through numerical modeling and simulation studies to maximize the oil production of a Middle Eastern oil field with 20 production wells with limited amount of gas to be injected. The key objective of this study is to assess the performance of the wells of the field after applying gas lift as an artificial lift method and applying the genetic algorithm as an optimization algorithm while comparing the results of the network to the case of artificially lifted wells by utilizing ESP pumps to the network and to have a more accurate view on the practicability of applying the gas lift optimization technique. The comparison is based on different measures and sensitivity studies, reservoir pressure, and water cut sensitivity analysis are applied to allow the assessment of the performance of the wells in the network throughout the life of the field. To have a full and insight view an economic study and comparison was applied in this study to estimate the benefits of applying the gas lift method and the GA optimization technique while comparing the results to the case of the ESP pumps and the case of naturally flowing wells. The gas lift technique proved to have the ability to enhance the production of the oil field and the optimization process showed quite an enhancement in the task of maximizing the oil production rate while using the same amount of gas to be injected in the each well, the sensitivity analysis showed that the gas lift method is comparable to the other artificial lift method and it have an upper hand in handling the reservoir pressure reduction, and economically CAPEX of the gas lift were calculated to be able to assess the time to reach a profitable income by comparing the results of OPEX of gas lift the technique showed a profitable income higher than the cases of naturally flowing wells and the ESP pumps lifted wells. Additionally, the paper illustrated the genetic algorithm (GA) optimization model in a way that allowed it to be followed as a guide for the task of optimizing the gas injection rate for a network with a large number of wells and limited amount of gas to be injected.


2021 ◽  
pp. 86-98
Author(s):  
V. Yu. Ogoreltsev ◽  
S. A. Leontiev ◽  
A. S. Drozdov

When developing hard-to-recover reserves of oil fields, methods of enhanced oil recovery, used from chemical ones, are massively used. To establish the actual oil-washing characteristics of surfactant grades accepted for testing in the pore space of oil-containing reservoir rocks, a set of laboratory studies was carried out, including the study of molecular-surface properties upon contact of oil from the BS10 formation of the West Surgutskoye field and model water types with the addition of surfactants of various concentrations, as well as filtration tests of surfactant technology compositions on core models of the VK1 reservoir of the Rogozhnikovskoye oil field. On the basis of the performed laboratory studies of rocks, it has been established that conducting pilot operations with the use of Neonol RHP-20 will lead to higher technological efficiency than from the currently used at the company's fields in the compositions of the technologies of physical and chemical EOR Neonol BS-1 and proposed for application of Neftenol VKS, Aldinol-50 and Betanol.


2021 ◽  
Vol 62 (3a) ◽  
pp. 65-75
Author(s):  
Thinh Van Nguyen ◽  

The Cuu Long basin is equiped with infrastructures and processing facilities serving for large-scale crude oil drilling and production operations. However, most of resevoirs in this area are now depleted, it means that they have reached their peaks and started to undergo decreasing productivity, which lead to a noticable excess capicity of equipment. In order to benefit from those declined oil fieds and maximize performance of platforms, solutions to connect marginal fields have been suggested and employed. Of which, connecting Ca Ngu Vang wellhead platform to the CPP -3 at Bach Ho oil field; platforms RC-04 and RC-DM at Nam Rong - Doi Moi oil filed to RC-1 platform at Rong oil field; wellhead platforms at Hai Su Den and Hai Su Trang oil fields to H4-TGT platform at Te Giac Trang oil field are typical examples of success. Optimistic achivements gained recently urges us to carry out this work with the aim to improve oil production of small reserves and to make best use of existing petroleum technology and equipment at the basin. Results of the research contribute an important part in the commence of producing small-scale oil deposits economically.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chaitanya Behera ◽  
Sandip Mahajan ◽  
Carlos Annia ◽  
Mahmood Harthi ◽  
Jane-Frances Obilaja ◽  
...  

Abstract This paper presents the results of a comprehensive study carried out to improve the understanding of deep bottom-up water injection, which enabled optimizing the recovery of a heavy oil field in South Oman. Understanding the variable water injection response and the scale of impact on oil recovery due to reservoir heterogeneity, operating reservoir pressure and liquid offtake management are the main challenges of deep bottoms-up water injection in heavy oil fields. The offtake and throughput management philosophy for heavy oil waterflood is not same as classical light oil. Due to unclear understanding of water injection response, sometimes the operators are tempted to implement alternative water injection trials leading to increase in the risk of losing reserves and unwarranted CAPEX sink. There are several examples of waterflood in heavy oil fields; however, very few examples of deep bottom water injection cases are available globally. The field G is one of the large heavy oil fields in South Oman; the oil viscosity varies between 250cp to 1500cp. The field came on-stream in 1989, but bottoms-up water-injection started in 2015, mainly to supplement the aquifer influx after 40% decline of reservoir pressure. After three years of water injection, the field liquid production was substantially lower than predicted, which implied risk on the incremental reserves. Alternative water injection concepts were tested by implementing multiple water injection trials apprehending the effectiveness of the bottoms-up water injection concept. A comprehensive integrated study including update of geocellular model, full field dynamic simulation, produced water re-injection (PWRI) model and conventional field performance analysis was undertaken for optimizing the field recovery. The Root Cause Analysis (RCA) revealed many reasons for suboptimal field performance including water injection management, productivity impairment due to near wellbore damage, well completion issues, and more importantly the variable water injection response in the field. The dynamic simulation study indicated negligible oil bank development due to frontal displacement and no water cut reversal as initial response to the water injection. Nevertheless, the significance of operating reservoir pressure, liquid offtake and throughput management impact on oil recovery cann't be precluded. The work concludes that the well reservoir management (WRM) strategy for heavy oil field is not same as the classical light oil waterflood. Nevertheless, the reservoir heterogeneity, oil column thickness and saturation history are also important influencing factors for variable water injection response in heavy oil field.


2017 ◽  
pp. 73-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. A. Ivanov ◽  
S. M. Sokolov

The issue of reliability assurance while constructing the oil field facilities by the example of West Siberian oil fields is considered. In particular, attention is paid to the problems that arise during the stage of mechanized crude oil production in case of high water cut of well produce, in severe natural and climatic conditions areas. The whole field development technological chain from the stage of crude oil production to the stage of crude-oil gathering and transportation was analyzed. For every stage the major factors, decreasing the system reliability, were determined and the suggestions for the elimination of these factors or reducing their negative influence were made. A number of possible measures for improvement field facilities construction reliability and profitability are indicated.


2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 123-130
Author(s):  
Aleksandr V. Korytov ◽  
Oleg A. Botkin ◽  
Aleksandr V. Knyazev ◽  
Petr V. Zimin ◽  
Dmitriy P. Patrakov ◽  
...  

Background. The study performed by Rosneft employees shown in this paper demonstrates approach and analytical methods that allows to forecast oil production at the level of minimal infrastructure units. These approaches are used to forecast long-term oil production and predict infrastructure blockage. The approach was partially automated by the authors. This made it possible to testing at giant Krasnoleninskoye oilfield. Aim. The study was performed in order to develop and test an approaches to forecast oil production of large oil fields with high detail levels. Materials and methods. Common methods of decline curve analysis and water-into-oil curve analysis were used in this work to analyze the precondition. The main feature of the approach is the analysis of precondition at the level of large well clusters and transfer it to the level of wells. Some of the actions were automated by new proprietary software and were tested at the giant brown field. The software was integrated with the corporate database. Results. An author’s approach has been developed. The approach allows to forecast oil production at the level of infrastructure units using analytical methods. Oil production of the giant brown field with high detail levels were forecasted using the proposed approaches and developed software. Conclusions. The results show that the developed approaches and software can be used to forecast mediumand long-term performance of producing oil fields in the conditions of existing external and infrastructural constraints.


2013 ◽  
Vol 53 (2) ◽  
pp. 489
Author(s):  
Reza Ardianto

Business management of oil and gas in Pertamina State Oil enterprises was handed to one of its subsidiaries: Pertamina EP (PEP). With a vast working area of 140,000 km2, it consists of 214 fields where 80% is an old field (mature field or brown field). Most of these oil fields were discovered during Dutch colonialism. One of these fields was Rantau oil field, discovered in 1928; it is considered one of potential structure at the time. Peak oil production was achieved at 31,711 barrels of oil per day (BOPD) (wc 17.2%) in 1969, and it is still producing 2,500 BOPD from primary stage.To get better recovery from the Rantau oil field, it is necessary to identify the potential of secondary recovery water-flooding. Some screening criteria had been completed to select an appropriate method that could be applied in the Rantau field. PEP is preparing an Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) program to be applied in some oil fields with subsurface and surface potential consideration. The implementation was initiated by the EOR Department at PEP. The issue of the national oil production increasing program from the government has to be realised by the EOR Department at Pertamina EP. Following the national oil increasing program, management of PEP urged to increase oil production in a rapid and realistic way. As a result, the program of secondary and tertiary recovery pilot project should be conducted simultaneously by the EOR Department on some of the fields that have passed their peak. On the other hand, PEP has only limited geology, geophysics, reservoir, and production (GGRP) data, and most of the oil fields have been producing since 1930s. The conditions that have to be dealt with are as follows: production from the existing field is declining, data is collected and interpreted during a long period, huge amounts of production data, and reservoir model and simulation do not exist and are not frequently updated. Based on this, the planning of EOR struggled due to length of time needed versus the need for quick development. It has become much more of a challenge for the team consisting of integrated geophysics, geology, reservoir, production, process facility, project management and economic evaluation. This extended abstract presents the term of managing limited GGRP data that contributes to the successful pilot waterflood project in the Rantau field. It also explains the uses of limited subsurface GGRP data to overcome the uncertainty for planning of the waterflood pilot project in the Rantau field, as a part of planning using limited data.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Podsobinski ◽  
Roman Madatov ◽  
Bartlomiej Kawecki ◽  
Grzegorz Paliborek ◽  
Piotr Wójcik ◽  
...  

Abstract In Poland there are approximately 60 oil fields located in different geological structures. Most of these fields have been producing for several years to several dozen years, and now require redefining of the development plan by utilizing an improved oil recovery (IOR) or enhanced oil recovery (EOR) method to achieve a higher oil recovery factor. Here we present the redevelopment plan for the Polish Main Dolomite oil field, that aimed to optimize and maximize the oil recovery factor. Considering all available geological and reservoir data, both a static and dynamic model were built and calibrated for three separate reservoirs connected to the same production facility. Then the comprehensive study was performed where different development scenarios was considered and tested using reservoir numerical simulation. The proposed redevelopment scenarios included excessive gas reinjection to the main reservoir, additional high-nitrogen (N2) gas injection from a nearby gas reservoir (87% of N2), carbon dioxide (CO2) injection, water injection, polymer injection, water-alternating-gas (WAG), well stimulation, and a combination of these methods. Development plans assumes also drilling new injection and production wells and converting existing producers to gas or water injectors. The key component in development scenarios was to arrest the pressure decline from the main field and decrease the gas/oil ratio (GOR). An additional challenge was to implement in the simulation model all key assumptions behind various development scenarios, while also taking into account specific facility constraints and simultaneously handling separate reservoirs that are connected to the same facility, and hence affecting each other. From numerous scenarios, the scenario that requires the least number of new wells was selected and further optimized. It considers the drilling of only one new producer, one new water injector, and conversion of some currently producing wells to gas and water injectors. The location of the proposed well and the amount of injection fluids was optimized to achieve the highest oil recovery factor and to postpone gas and water breakthrough as much as possible. The optimized case that assumes low investments is expected to improve incremental oil production by 90% over No Further Actions Scenario. However, the study suggests the potential of more than tripling incremental oil production under a scenario with considerably higher expenditures. The improved case assumes drilling one more producer, four new water injectors, and injection of three times more water. The presented field optimization example highlights that in many existing Polish oil fields there is still a potential to reach higher oil recovery without considerable expenditures. However, to obtain more significant oil recovery improvement, higher capital expenditure is necessary. To facilitate the selection of the best development scenario, a detailed economic and risk analysis needs to be conducted.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-44
Author(s):  
Ayat Ahmed Jassim ◽  
Abdul Aali Al-dabaj ◽  
Aqeel S. AL-Adili

The water injection of the most important technologies to increase oil production from petroleum reservoirs. In this research, we developed a model for oil tank using the software RUBIS for reservoir simulation. This model was used to make comparison in the production of oil and the reservoir pressure for two case studies where the water was not injected in the first case study but adding new vertical wells while, later, it was injected in the second case study. It represents the results of this work that if the water is not injected, the reservoir model that has been upgraded can produce only 2.9% of the original oil in the tank. This case study also represents a drop in reservoir pressure, which was not enough to support oil production. Thus, the implementation of water injection in the second case study of the average reservoir pressure may support, which led to an increase in oil production by up to 5.5% of the original oil in the tank. so that, the use of water injection is a useful way to increase oil production. Therefore, many of the issues related to this subject valuable of study where the development of new ideas and techniques.


2019 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-14
Author(s):  
Muslim Abdurrahman ◽  
Fiki H. Ferizal ◽  
Dadan D.S.M. Saputra ◽  
Riri P. Sari

Oil and gas industry is struggling to improve oil production using several methods. CO2 injection is one of the advance proven technology to enhance oil production in numerous oil field in the world. Key parameters during CO2 injection are viscosity reduction and oil swelling which can improve oil production. CO2 injection also has high possibility to be applied in Indonesia's oil fields due to abundant CO2 sources surrounding oil fields. R field is one of reservoir candidates that appropriate for CO2 injection. It has a low pressure and low oil recovery due to low permeability (1-26,2 mD).The CO2 injection technique used in this study was huff and puff that consist of injection, shut in, and production phases. The simulation was conducted using compositional simulator. There were two parameters chosen to be analyzed, which were soaking time and injection cycle. The objective of this study is to know the CO2 huff and puff perfomance for improving oil recovery on low permeability reservoir. The result of the soaking time cases yields optimum condition in 21 days. For the case of injection cycle, the result for optimum condition is in 2 injection cycles. The recovery factor (RF) for both optimum condition reaches 22.96% from the baseline without gas injection (RF 5.82%).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document