A Model for Two-Phase Flow in Consolidated Materials

1969 ◽  
Vol 9 (02) ◽  
pp. 221-231 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Ehrlich ◽  
F.E. Crane

Abstract A consolidated porous medium is mathematically modeled by networks of irregularly shaped interconnected pore channels. Mechanisms are described that form residual saturations during immiscible displacement both by entire pore channels being bypassed and by fluids being isolated by the movement of an interface within individual pore channels. This latter mechanism is shown to depend strongly on pore channel irregularity. Together, these mechanisms provide an explanation for the drainage-imbibition-hysteresis effect. The calculation of steady-state relative permeabilities, based on a pore-size distribution permeabilities, based on a pore-size distribution obtained from a Berea sandstone, is described. These relative permeability curves agree qualitatively with curves that are generally accepted to be typical for highly consolidated materials. In situations where interfacial effects predominate over viscous and gravitational effects, the following conclusions are reached.Relative permeability at a given saturation is everywhere independent of flow rate.Relative permeability is independent of viscosity ratio everywhere except at very low values of wetting phase relative permeability.Irreducible wetting-phase saturation following steady-state drainage decreases with increasing ratio of nonwetting- to wetting-phase viscosity.Irreducible wetting-phase saturation following unsteady-state drainage is lower than for steady-state drainage.Irreducible nonwetting-phase saturation following imbibition is independent of viscosity ratio, whether or not the imbibition is carried out under steady- or unsteady-state conditions. Experiments qualitatively verify the conclusions regarding unsteady-state residual wetting-phase saturation. Implications of these conclusions are discussed. Introduction Natural and artificial porous materials are generally composed of matrix substance brought together in a more or less random manner. This leads to the creation of a network of interconnected pore spaces of highly irregular shape. Since the pore spaces of highly irregular shape. Since the geometry of such a network is impossible to describe, we can never obtain a complete description of its flow behavior. We can, however, abstract those properties of the porous medium pertinent to the type of flow under consideration, and thus obtain an adequate description of that flow. Thus, the Kozeny-Carmen equation, by considering a porous medium as a bundle of noninterconnecting capillary tubes, provides an adequate description of single-phase provides an adequate description of single-phase flow. With the addition of a saturation-dependent tortuosity parameter in two-phase flow to account for flow path elongation, the Kozeny-Carmen equation has been used to predict relative permeabilities for the displacement of a wetting permeabilities for the displacement of a wetting liquid by a gas. It has long been recognized that relative permeability depends not only on saturation but permeability depends not only on saturation but also on saturation history as well. Naar and Henderson described a mathematical model in which differences between drainage and imbibition behavior are explained in terms of a bypassing mechanism by which oil is trapped during imbibition. Fatt proposed a model for a porous medium that consisted of regular networks of cylindrical tubes of randomly distributed radii. From this he calculated the drainage relative permeability curves. Moore and Slobod, Rose and Witherspoon, and Rose and Cleary each considered flow in a pore doublet (a parallel arrangement of a small and pore doublet (a parallel arrangement of a small and large diameter cylindrical capillary tube). They concluded that, because of the different rates of flow in each tube, trapping would occur in one of the tubes; the extent of which would depend upon viscosity ratio and capillary pressure. SPEJ p. 221

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 817-825 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Khurram Zahoor

Reservoir surveillance always requires fast, unproblematic access and solution to different relative permeability models which have been developed from time to time. In addition, complex models sometimes require in-depth knowledge of mathematics for solution prior to use them for data generation. For this purpose, in-house software has been designed to generate rigorous relative permeability curves, with a provision to include users own relative permeability models, a part from built-in various relative permeability correlations. The developed software with state-of-the-art algorithms has been used to analyze the effect of variations in residual and maximum wetting phase saturation on relative permeability curves for a porous medium having very high non-uniformity in pore size distribution. To further increase the spectrum of the study, two relative permeability models, i.e., Pirson's correlation and Brooks and Corey model has been used and the obtained results show that the later model is more sensitive to such variations.


1961 ◽  
Vol 1 (02) ◽  
pp. 59-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Downie ◽  
F.E. Crane

Introduction The general application of Darcy's law to natural rocks has already been challenged in the literature. The evidence shows that the permeability as calculated from the Darcy equation can be a function of the pressure drop and the salt concentration of the water phase. Most explanations for aberrant behavior involve clays and their properties and have been qualitatively satisfactory. Recently, however, Odeh revived the theoretical views of Yuster. Since Yuster's concept implies a fundamental error in using Darcy's relationship for two-phase flow, and not merely that conditions may limit its use, Odeh's experimental support arouses considerable interest. However, Odeh's work as presented is thought to be inadequate. He has omitted important information about his materials and procedures; therefore, acceptance of his conclusions should be withheld. Since a clay effect is possible, Odeh should have been allowed space to present a more detailed account of the rocks which he used and the precautions which he took to avoid confounding the effects of clay and fluid circulation. In addition, it follows from Odeh's discussion that the oil relative permeability should increase as the viscosity ratio increases. Odeh presents data corroborating this deduction. It also follows that the oil relative permeability should decrease as the viscosity ratio of oil to water decreases. However, our results show that a high relative permeability, when once attained by using a viscous oil, may be maintained when that oil is replaced by an oil of much lower viscosity.


1966 ◽  
Vol 6 (03) ◽  
pp. 199-205 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.M. Sarem

Abstract For the performance prediction of multiphase oil recovery processes such as steam stimulation, there is an acute need for three-phase relative permeability data. No fast and simple experimental technique, such as the unsteady-state method proposed by Welge for two-phase flow, is available for the three-phase flow. In this paper, an unsteady-state method is presented for obtaining three-phase relative permeability data; this method is as fast and easy as Welge's method for two-phase flow. Analytical expressions are derived by extension of the Buckley-Leverett theory to three-phase flow to express the saturation at the outflow face for all three phases in terms of the known parameters. It is assumed that the fractional flow and relative permeability of each phase are a function of the saturation of that phase. Other simplifying assumptions made include the neglect of capillary and gravity effects. The effect of saturation history upon relative permeability is acknowledged and attainment of similar saturation history in laboratory and field is recommended. The required experimental work and computations are simple to perform. The test core is presaturated with oil and water, then subjected to gas drive. During the test, required data are the rates of oil, water, and gas production, together with pressure drop and temperature. The ordinary gas-oil unsteady-state relative permeability apparatus can be readily modified to measure the required data. The proposed technique was applied to samples of a Berea and a reservoir core. The effect of saturation history upon relative permeability was studied on one Berea core. It was found that increase in initial water saturation has a similar effect upon three-phase relative permeability as it does in two-phase flow. Introduction In the light of increasing demand for three-phase, relative permeability data for predicting the performance of thermal and other multiphase-flow recovery processes, a simple and accurate method of experimental determination of such data is extremely desirable. Leverett and Lewis1 described the simultaneous flow method of obtaining three-phase relative permeability data. However, Caudle et al.2 reported that this method is very time consuming and cumbersome. Corey3 proposed calculating the three-phase relative permeability from measured krg data. Corey's theory is based on simplified capillary pressure curves,4 assuming a straight line relationship between 1/Pc2 and saturation. Also, Corey's method assumes a preferentially water-wet system. The simplest and quickest method of obtaining three-phase relative permeability data is the unsteady-state method where, for instance, oil and water are displaced by gas. However, in such a test the correlation of average saturation with relative permeability does not give a valid relationship because the rates of oil, water and gas flow in the sample change continuously from the upstream to downstream end. This difficulty in calculating valid relationships was solved by Welge for two-phase flow by deriving an expression from Buckley and Leverett frontal advance equations.5,6 In this paper, relations are established to determine the outflow face saturation and relative permeability to all phases in a three-phase flow displacement experiment. Proposed Method The fundamentals established by Buckley and Leverett5 for two-phase flow were extended to three-phase flow and used as a basis for the derivation of saturation equations. This approach is comparable to Welge's6 use of Buckley and Leverett theory in arriving at expressions to determine the outflow face saturation of the displacing fluid in a two-phase flow system.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdulla Aljaberi ◽  
Seyed Amir Farzaneh ◽  
Shokoufeh Aghabozorgi ◽  
Mohammad Saeid Ataei ◽  
Mehran Sohrabi

Abstract Oil recovery by low salinity waterflood is significantly affected by fluid-fluid interaction through the micro-dispersion effect. This interaction influences rock wettability and relative permeability functions. Therefore, to gain a better insight into multiphase flow in porous media and perform numerical simulations, reliable relative permeability data is crucial. Unsteady-state or steady-state displacement methods are commonly used in the laboratory to measure water-oil relative permeability curves of a core sample. Experimentally, the unsteady-state core flood technique is more straightforward and less time-consuming compared to the steady-state method. However, the obtained data is limited to a small saturation range, and the associated uncertainty is not negligible. On the other hand, the steady-state method provides a more accurate dataset of two-phase relative permeability needed in the reservoir simulator for a reliable prediction of the high salinity and low salinity waterflood displacement performance. Considering the limitations of the unsteady state method, steady-state high salinity and low salinity brine experiments waterflood experiments were performed to compare the obtained relative permeability curves. The experiments were performed on a carbonate reservoir sample using a live reservoir crude oil under reservoir conditions. The test was designed so that the production and pressure drop curve covers a wider saturation range and provides enough data for analysis. Consequently, reliable relative permeability functions were obtained, initially, for a better comparison and prediction of the high salinity and the low salinity waterflood injections and then, to quantify the effect of low salinity waterflood under steady-state conditions. The results confirm the difference in relative permeability curves between high salinity and low salinity injections due to the micro-dispersion effect, which caused a decrease in water relative permeability and an increase in the oil relative permeability. These results also proved that low salinity brine can change the rock wettability from oil-wet or mixed-wet to more water-wet conditions. Furthermore, the obtained relative permeability curves extend across a substantial saturation range, making it valuable information required for numerical simulations. To the best of our knowledge, the reported data in this work is a pioneer in quantifying the impact of low salinity waterflood at steady-state conditions using a reservoir crude oil and reservoir rock, which is of utmost importance for the oil and gas industry.


2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 129-140
Author(s):  
Jorge Ordóñez ◽  
José Villegas ◽  
Alamir Alvarez

En el presente trabajo se propone el uso de un único set de curvas de permeabilidad a ser empleado en los estudios de simulación y caracterización de yacimientos de gas en mantos de carbón (CBM), en vez del uso común de un set de curvas para cada estrato individual. Para comprobar la aplicabilidad de este procedimiento, se simula un yacimiento usando ambos métodos: el resultado de producción debe ser similar en ambas simulacionesEl modelo para promediar la permeabilidad absoluta en un flujo monofásico, fue usado para el caso de predecir un promedio de permeabilidad relativa para un yacimiento con flujo bifásico. Luego de correr varios casos y corroborar que la ecuación propuesta no cumplía las expectativas, el enfoque del trabajo fue explicar el por qué del no funcionamiento de la ecuación propuesta. Una posible explicación fue la no consideración de la gravedad, que acorde a varias simulaciones presentadas, es un parámetro principal en las curvas de producción. La saturación de agua tampoco puede excluirse de la ecuación que prediga este promedio.  Por tanto si se quiere presentar una ecuación para el cálculo de promedio de permeabilidades relativas, es fundamental que tanto la gravedad como la saturación de agua estén incluidas en esta ecuación.Abstract This paper tries to average relative permeability in a way that instead of using different sets of relative permeability curves to different layers, one single set could be used in one single layer, and to get similar production results as if different layers and different relative permeability were used instead. The model to average absolute permeability in a single-phase flow system was used to predict two-phase flow average relative permeability. After running different cases and corroborating that the equation proposed did not match the expectations. The focus of this work was changed in order to explain why the equation was not working. A possible explanation of why the equation is not accurate could be that the equation is not considering the influence of gravity. Gravity plays a very important role in reservoirs. After gas desorption process occurs, free gas migrates to top layers and water migrates to bottom layers. Water saturation could not be excluded from the equation that averages relative permeability curves. The effects of gravity should be considered too, if you want to get an equation to predict production behaviour by using one average equation in a single layer.


1971 ◽  
Vol 11 (04) ◽  
pp. 419-425 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlon S. Land

Abstract Two-phase imbibition relative permeability was measured in an attempt to validate a method of calculating imbibition relative permeability. The stationary-liquid-phase method was used to measure several hysteresis loops for alundum and Berea sandstone samples. The method of calculating imbibition relative permeability is described, and calculated relative permeability curves are compared with measured curves. The calculated relative Permeability is shown to be a reasonably good Permeability is shown to be a reasonably good approximation of measured values if an adjustment is made to some necessary data. Due to the compressibility of gas, which is used as the nonwetting phase, a correction to the measured trapped gas saturation is necessary to make it agree with the critical gas saturation of the imbibition relative permeability curve. Introduction The existence of hysteresis in the relationship of relative permeability to saturation has been recognized for many yews. Geden et al. and Osoba et al. called attention to the occurrence of hysteresis and the importance of the direction of saturation change on the relative permeability-saturation relations. It is generally believed that relative permeability is a function of saturation alone for a permeability is a function of saturation alone for a given direction of saturation change, but that there is a distinct difference in relative permeability curves for saturation changes in different directions. The reservoir engineer should be aware of this hysteresis, and he should select the relative permeability curve which is appropriate for the permeability curve which is appropriate for the recovery process of interest. The directions of saturation change have been designated "drainage" and "imbibition" in reference to changes in the wetting-phase saturation. In a two-phase system, an increase in the wetting-phase saturation is referred to as imbibition, while a decrease in wetting-phase saturation is called drainage. The solution-gas-drive recovery mechanism is controlled by relative permeability to oil and gas in which the saturation of oil, the wetting phase, is decreasing. In waterflooding a water-wet reservoir rock, the saturation of water, the wetting phase, is increasing. These two sets of relative permeability curves, gas-oil and oil-water, do not have the same relationship to the wetting-phase saturation. This difference is not due to the difference in fluid properties, but is a result of the difference in properties, but is a result of the difference in direction of saturation change. The flow properties of the drainage and imbibition systems differ because of the entrapment of the nonwetting phase during imbibition. As drainage occurs, the nonwetting phase occupies the most favorable flow channels. During imbibition, part of the nonwetting phase is bypassed by the increasing wetting phase, leaving a portion of the nonwetting phase in an immobile condition. This trapped part phase in an immobile condition. This trapped part of the nonwetting phase saturation does not contribute to the flow of that phase, and at a given saturation the relative permeability to the nonwetting phase is always less in the imbibition direction phase is always less in the imbibition direction than in the drainage direction. The concept that some of the nonwetting phase is mobile and some is immobile during a saturation change in the imbibition direction previously was used to develop equations for imbibition relative permeability. In this development, it was assumed permeability. In this development, it was assumed that the amount of entrapment at any saturation can be obtained from the relationship between initial nonwetting-phase saturations established in the drainage direction and residual saturations after complete imbibition. The equations for imbibition relative permeability were not verified by laboratory measurements. The purpose of this report is m give the results of a laboratory study of imbibition relative permeability and to present a comparison of calculated relative permeability with relative permeability from laboratory measurements. permeability from laboratory measurements. In two-phase systems, hysteresis is more prominent in the relative permeability to the nonwetting phase than in that to the wetting phase. The hysteresis in the wetting-phase relative permeability is believed to be very small, and thus difficult to distinguish tom normal experimental error. SPEJ P. 419


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document