Integrated EOR Screening in a Marginal Oil Field Environment

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chukwunonso Uche ◽  
Samuel Esieboma ◽  
Jennifer Uche ◽  
Ibrahim Bukar
Keyword(s):  
Enhanced Oil Recovery ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Laboratory Data ◽  
Oil Field ◽  
Chemical Flooding ◽  
Implementation Challenges ◽  
Recovery Potential ◽  
Field Environment ◽  
Screening Study ◽  
The Impact

Abstract An evaluation of potential EOR processes applicable in the marginal oil field operation of the Niger Delta region is presented. Technical feasibility, process availability, oil recovery potential, and other uncertainties and risks associated with exploitation of enhanced oil recovery technique in a marginal oil field environment are being assessed. Few Enhanced oil recovery processes, namely polymer flooding, chemical flooding and microbial EOR (MEOR), are considered for possible application in this marginal oil field. The objective of the screening study is to evaluate and rank the EOR options and also select the most attractive method that will have to be further chased to a pilot test stage. Emphasis is strictly on a technical assessment of the incremental oil potential of each of the EOR methods and also identification of critical operational and logistical components of the entire process for their implementation in the offshore operating environment. Recoverable volumes associated with EOR may be significant, but key project development and implementation challenges and extra cost elements must be considered in any EOR forecast for an effective EOR process ranking. Some of these concerns (e.g. Polymer/chemical supply, facilities requirements, and the impact of EOR on reservoir performance and wellbore integrity) may be significant enough to eliminate a method from being considered further and at that point the best EOR option that requires minimal cost exposure for achieving the best recoverable shall be considered. Moreso, there is consideration of the quantity and quality of laboratory data that should support the viability of each EOR process being considered. This paper narrates the state of technical readiness for field implementation of each EOR method and identifies remaining work required to progress EOR process in this marginal oil field.

Investigating CO2-enhanced oil recovery potential for a mature oil field: a case study based on Ankleshwar oil field, Cambay Basin, India

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shib Sankar Ganguli ◽  
Nimisha Vedanti ◽  
Idar Akervoll ◽  
Per E. Bergmo ◽  
Ravi P. Srivastava ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Enhanced Oil Recovery ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Oil Field ◽  
Cambay Basin ◽  
Recovery Potential

Design and Demonstration of New Single-Well Tracer Test for Viscous Chemical Enhanced-Oil-Recovery Fluids

SPE Journal ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (04) ◽  
pp. 1075-1085 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Fortenberry ◽  
Pearson Suniga ◽  
Mojdeh Delshad ◽  
Bharat Singh ◽  
Hassan A. AlKaaoud ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Enhanced Oil Recovery ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Reactive Transport ◽  
History Matching ◽  
Pore Space ◽  
Laboratory Data ◽  
Chemical Flooding ◽  
Oil Saturation ◽  
Single Well ◽  
Partitioning Tracers

Summary Single-well-partitioning-tracer tests (SWTTs) are used to measure the saturation of oil or water near a wellbore. If used before and after injection of enhanced-oil-recovery (EOR) fluids, they can evaluate EOR flood performance in a so-called one-spot pilot. Four alkaline/surfactant/polymer (ASP) one-spot pilots were recently completed in Kuwait's Sabriyah-Mauddud (SAMA) reservoir, a thick, heterogeneous carbonate operated by Kuwait Oil Company (KOC). UTCHEM (Delshad et al. 2013), the University of Texas chemical-flooding reservoir simulator, was used to interpret results of two of these one-spot pilots performed in an unconfined zone within the thick SAMA formation. These simulations were used to design a new method for injecting partitioning tracers for one-spot pilots. The recommended practice is to inject the tracers into a relatively uniform confined zone, but, as seen in this work, that is not always possible, so an alternative design was needed to improve the accuracy of the test. The simulations showed that there was a flow-conformance problem when the partitioning tracers were injected into a perforated zone without confinement after the viscous ASP and polymer-drive solutions. The water-conveyed-tracer solutions were being partially diverted outside of the ASP-swept zone where they contacted unswept oil. Because of this problem, the initial interpretation of the performance of the chemicals was pessimistic, overestimating the chemical residual oil saturation (ROS) by up to 12 saturation units. Additional simulations indicated that the oil saturation in the ASP-swept zone could be properly estimated by avoiding the post-ASP waterflood and injecting the post-ASP tracers in a viscous polymer solution rather than in water. An ASP one-spot pilot using the new SWTT design resulted in an estimated ROS of only 0.06 after injection of chemicals (Carlisle et al. 2014). These saturation values were obtained by history matching tracer-production data by use of both traditional continuously-stirred-tank (CSTR) models and compositional, reactive-transport reservoir models. The ability of the simulator to model every phase of the one-spot pilot operation was crucial to the insight of modified SWTT design. The waterflood, first SWTT, ASP flood, and the final SWTT were simulated using a heterogeneous permeability field representative of the Mauddud formation. Laboratory data, field-ASP quality-control information, and injection strategy were all accounted for in these simulations. We describe the models, how they were used, and how the results were used to modify the SWTT design. We further discuss the implications for other SWTTs. The advantage of mechanistic simulation of multiple aspects of a one-spot pilot is an important theme of this study. Because the pore space investigated by the SWTTs can be affected by the previously injected EOR fluids (and vice versa), these interactions should be accounted for. This simulation approach can be used to identify and mitigate design problems during each phase of a challenging one-spot pilot.

scholarly journals Experimental Microemulsion Flooding Study to Increase Low Viscosity Oil Recovery Using Glass Micromodel

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Hamed Hematpur ◽  
Reza Abdollahi ◽  
Mohsen Safari-Beidokhti ◽  
Hamid Esfandyari
Keyword(s):  
Enhanced Oil Recovery ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Clean Energy ◽  
Injection Rate ◽  
Chemical Flooding ◽  
Recovery Method ◽  
Low Viscosity ◽  
Glass Micromodel ◽  
Actual Field ◽  
The Impact

The growing demand for clean energy can be met by improving the recovery of current resources. One of the effective methods in recovering the unswept reserves is chemical flooding. Microemulsion flooding is an alternative for surfactant flooding in a chemical-enhanced oil recovery method and can entirely sweep the remaining oil in porous media. The efficiency of microemulsion flooding is guaranteed through phase behavior analysis and customization regarding the actual field conditions. Reviewing the literature, there is a lack of experience that compared the macroscopic and microscopic efficiency of microemulsion flooding, especially in low viscous oil reservoirs. In the current study, one-quarter five-spot glass micromodel was implemented for investigating the effect of different parameters on microemulsion efficiency, including surfactant types, injection rate, and micromodel pattern. Image analysis techniques were applied to represent the phase saturations throughout the microemulsion flooding tests. The results confirm the appropriate efficiency of microemulsion flooding in improving the ultimate recovery. LABS microemulsion has the highest efficiency, and the increment of the injection rate has an adverse effect on oil recovery. According to the pore structure’s tests, it seems that permeability has little impact on recovery. The results of this study can be used in enhanced oil recovery designs in low-viscosity oil fields. It shows the impact of crucial parameters in microemulsion flooding.

Enhanced Oil Recovery Application of Nanoparticles in Niger Delta Water-Wet Reservoir Rock

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tinuola Udoh
Keyword(s):  
Enhanced Oil Recovery ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Niger Delta ◽  
Oil Production ◽  
Reservoir Rock ◽  
Core Flooding ◽  
Core Samples ◽  
Recovery Potential ◽  
Secondary Formation ◽  
Injection Modes

Abstract In this paper, the enhanced oil recovery potential of the application of nanoparticles in Niger Delta water-wet reservoir rock was investigated. Core flooding experiments were conducted on the sandstone core samples at 25 °C with the applications of nanoparticles in secondary and tertiary injection modes. The oil production during flooding was used to evaluate the enhanced oil recovery potential of the nanoparticles in the reservoir rock. The results of the study showed that the application of nanoparticles in tertiary mode after the secondary formation brine flooding increased oil production by 16.19% OIIP. Also, a comparison between the oil recoveries from secondary formation brine and nanoparticles flooding showed that higher oil recovery of 81% OIIP was made with secondary nanoparticles flooding against 57% OIIP made with formation brine flooding. Finally, better oil recovery of 7.67% OIIP was achieved with secondary application of nanoparticles relative to the tertiary application of formation brine and nanoparticles flooding. The results of this study are significant for the design of the application of nanoparticles in Niger Delta reservoirs.

Modeling to support physicochemical enhancement techniques

2021 ◽  
pp. 79-90
Author(s):  
Т. A. Pospelova
Keyword(s):  
Enhanced Oil Recovery ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Chemical Modeling ◽  
Comparative Structure ◽  
Water Cut ◽  
Physical And Chemical ◽  
Oil And Gas Companies ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Selection Of

The article discusses ways to increase the oil recovery factor in already developed fields, special attention is paid to the methods of enhanced oil recovery. The comparative structure of oil production in Russia in the medium term is given. The experience of oil and gas companies in the application of enhanced oil recovery in the fields is analyzed and the dynamics of the growth in the use of various enhanced oil recovery in Russia is estimated. With an increase in the number of operations in the fields, the requirements for the selection of candidates inevitably increase, therefore, the work focuses on hydrodynamic modeling of physical and chemical modeling, highlights the features and disadvantages of existing simulators. The main dependences for adequate modeling during polymer flooding are given. The calculation with different concentration of polymer solution is presented, which significantly affects the water cut and further reduction of operating costs for the preparation of the produced fluid. The possibility of creating a specialized hydrodynamic simulator for low-volume chemical enhanced oil recovery is considered, since mainly simulators are applicable for chemical waterflooding and the impact is on the formation as a whole.

The Impact of Ionic Liquid and Nanoparticles on Stabilizing Foam for Enhanced Oil Recovery

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (44) ◽  
pp. 12461-12468
Author(s):  
Lei Jiang ◽  
Jingtao Sun ◽  
Jiqian Wang ◽  
Qi Xue ◽  
Songyan Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ionic Liquid ◽  
Enhanced Oil Recovery ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
The Impact

scholarly journals Enhanced Oil Recovery: Chemical Flooding

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed Ragab ◽  
Eman M. Mansour
Keyword(s):  
Interfacial Tension ◽  
Enhanced Oil Recovery ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Recovery Phase ◽  
Mobility Ratio ◽  
Chemical Flooding ◽  
Sweep Efficiency ◽  
Oil Displacement ◽  
Remaining Oil ◽  
Oil Displacement Efficiency

The enhanced oil recovery phase of oil reservoirs production usually comes after the water/gas injection (secondary recovery) phase. The main objective of EOR application is to mobilize the remaining oil through enhancing the oil displacement and volumetric sweep efficiency. The oil displacement efficiency enhances by reducing the oil viscosity and/or by reducing the interfacial tension, while the volumetric sweep efficiency improves by developing a favorable mobility ratio between the displacing fluid and the remaining oil. It is important to identify remaining oil and the production mechanisms that are necessary to improve oil recovery prior to implementing an EOR phase. Chemical enhanced oil recovery is one of the major EOR methods that reduces the residual oil saturation by lowering water-oil interfacial tension (surfactant/alkaline) and increases the volumetric sweep efficiency by reducing the water-oil mobility ratio (polymer). In this chapter, the basic mechanisms of different chemical methods have been discussed including the interactions of different chemicals with the reservoir rocks and fluids. In addition, an up-to-date status of chemical flooding at the laboratory scale, pilot projects and field applications have been reported.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document