Selection of EOR Technology in Ultra-Low-Permeability Reservoirs of the Achimov Deposits of the Priobsky Field

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Azat Albertovich Gimazov ◽  
Anzhelika Igorevna Balionis ◽  
Evgeniy Ivanovich Sergeev ◽  
Elmir Rovshanovich Khudiev ◽  
Ruslan Pavlovich Uchuev
Keyword(s):  
Enhanced Oil Recovery ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Gas Injection ◽  
Low Permeability ◽  
Well Testing ◽  
Injection Wells ◽  
Suggested Approach ◽  
Nitrogen Injection ◽  
Core Evaluation ◽  
Low Permeability Reservoirs

Abstract To create a technology for selection the optimal RPM method the simulation on a sector hydrodynamic model of the field has performed. Different injection modes (continuous injection, alternating, cyclic), injection agents and completions of injection wells were tried during the modeling. The key factors, which influence the choice of the RPM method, were determined. Pilot industrial works include short-term nitrogen injection, long-term APG injection, and production from pilot wells in various modes. Well research include pressure testing, well testing after gas injection, recording of inflow profiles, laboratory studies of the Priobskoye field's own core. Evaluation of the potential of gas enhanced oil recovery methods shows their significantly higher efficiency compared to stationary waterflooding. The suggested approach can minimize the risks in the transition to previously untested development methods and methods of enhanced oil recovery in ultra-low-permeability reservoirs of the Achimov deposits. The analysis and the results of partially conducted pilot projects (at the moment) have showed a high potential for gas injection in certain areas of the field.

scholarly journals Enhanced Oil Recovery by a Suspension of Core-Shell Polymeric Nanoparticles in Heterogeneous Low-Permeability Oil Reservoirs

Nanomaterials ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 600 ◽  
Author(s):  
Long ◽  
Wang ◽  
Zhu ◽  
Huang ◽  
Leng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Enhanced Oil Recovery ◽  
Newtonian Fluid ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Polymeric Nanoparticles ◽  
Low Permeability ◽  
High Permeability ◽  
Permeability Ratio ◽  
Nanoparticle Suspension ◽  
Shear Rates ◽  
Low Permeability Reservoirs

Polymeric nanoparticle suspension is a newly developed oil-displacing agent for enhanced oil recovery (EOR) in low-permeability reservoirs. In this work, SiO2/P(MBAAm-co-AM) polymeric nanoparticles were successfully synthesized by a simple distillation–precipitation polymerization method. Due to the introduction of polymer, the SiO2/P(MBAAm-co-AM) nanoparticles show a favorable swelling performance in aqueous solution, and their particle sizes increase from 631 to 1258 nm as the swelling times increase from 24 to 120 h. The apparent viscosity of SiO2/P(MBAAm-co-AM) suspension increases with an increase of mass concentration and swelling time, whereas it decreases as the salinity and temperature increase. The SiO2/P(MBAAm-co-AM) suspension behaves like a non-Newtonian fluid at lower shear rates, yet like a Newtonian fluid at shear rates greater than 300 s−1. The EOR tests of the SiO2/P(MBAAm-co-AM) suspension in heterogeneous, low-permeability cores show that SiO2/P(MBAAm-co-AM) nanoparticles can effectively improve the sweep efficiency and recover more residual oils. A high permeability ratio can result in a high incremental oil recovery in parallel cores. With an increase of the permeability ratio of parallel cores from 1.40 to 15.49, the ratios of incremental oil recoveries (low permeability/high permeability) change from 7.69/4.61 to 23.61/8.46. This work demonstrates that this SiO2/P(MBAAm-co-AM) suspension is an excellent conformance control agent for EOR in heterogeneous, low-permeability reservoirs. The findings of this study can help to further the understanding of the mechanisms of EOR using SiO2/P(MBAAm-co-AM) suspension in heterogeneous, low-permeability reservoirs.

scholarly journals The efficiency of gas injection into low-permeability multilayer hydrocarbon reservoirs

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (10) ◽  
pp. 100-108
Author(s):  
Sudad H AL-Obaidi ◽  
Miel Hofmann ◽  
Falah H. Khalaf ◽  
Hiba H. Alwan
Keyword(s):  
Hydraulic Fracturing ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Gas Injection ◽  
Oil Production ◽  
Recovery Factor ◽  
Low Permeability ◽  
Compositional Model ◽  
Multistage Hydraulic Fracturing ◽  
Low Permeability Reservoirs ◽  
Working Agent

The efficiency of gas injection for developing terrigenous deposits within a multilayer producing object is investigated in this article. According to the results of measurements of the 3D hydrodynamic compositional model, an assessment of the oil recovery factor was made. In the studied conditions, re-injection of the associated gas was found to be the most technologically efficient working agent. The factors contributing to the inefficacy of traditional methods of stimulating oil production such as multistage hydraulic fracturing when used to develop low-permeability reservoirs have been analyzed. The factors contributing to the inefficiency of traditional oil-production stimulation methods, such as multistage hydraulic fracturing, have been analysed when they are applied to low-permeability reservoirs. The use of a gas of various compositions is found to be more effective as a working agent for reservoirs with permeability less than 0.005 µm2. Ultimately, the selection of an agent for injection into the reservoir should be driven by the criteria that allow assessing the applicability of the method under specific geological and physical conditions. In multilayer production objects, gas injection efficiency is influenced by a number of factors, in addition to displacement, including the ratio of gas volumes, the degree to which pressure is maintained in each reservoir, as well as how the well is operated. With the increase in production rate from 60 to 90 m3 / day during the re-injection of produced hydrocarbon gas, this study found that the oil recovery factor increased from 0.190 to 0.229. The further increase in flow rate to 150 m3 / day, however, led to a faster gas breakthrough, a decrease in the amount of oil produced, and a decrease in the oil recovery factor to 0.19 Based on the results of the research, methods for stimulating the formation of low-permeability reservoirs were ranked based on their efficacy.

scholarly journals Study on three phase foam for Enhanced Oil Recovery in extra-low permeability reservoirs

2018 ◽  
Vol 73 ◽  
pp. 55 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ming Zhou ◽  
Juncheng Bu ◽  
Jie Wang ◽  
Xiao Guo ◽  
Jie Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Enhanced Oil Recovery ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Foam Stability ◽  
Temperature Tolerance ◽  
Resistance Coefficient ◽  
Low Permeability ◽  
Displacement Efficiency ◽  
Three Phase ◽  
Profile Control ◽  
Low Permeability Reservoirs

Poly (MSt-MMA) nanosphere as foam stabilizing agent was synthesized by emulsion polymerization. The three phase foam was prepared with Disodium 4-Dodecyl-2,4′-Oxydiben Zenesulfonate (DOZS) as foaming agent, Hydrolyzed Polyacrylamide (HPAM) and synthesized poly (MSt-MMA) nanospheres as the mixed foam stabilizing agents. It had outstanding foaming performance and foam stability. The optimal three phase foam system consisting of 0.12 wt% HPAM, 0.04 wt% poly (MSt-MMA) nanospheres and 0.12 wt% DOZS by orthogonal experiment, had high apparent viscosity, which showed that three components had a very good synergistic effect. The three phase foam’s temperature tolerance and salt tolerance were researched in laboratory tests. Flooding oil experiment showed that the average displacement efficiency of three phase foam system was 16.1 wt% in single core experiments and 21.7 wt% in double core experiments. Resistance coefficient of low permeability core was more than those of high permeability core, but their residual resistance coefficients were small. The results of core experiment and pilot test indicated that the three phase foam had good profile control ability and generated low damage to the low permeability layer for extra-low permeability reservoirs. Three phase foam flooding has great prospects for Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) in extra-low permeability reservoirs.

Smart mobility control agent for enhanced oil recovery during CO2 flooding in ultra-low permeability reservoirs

Fuel ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 241 ◽  
pp. 442-450 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan Zhang ◽  
Mingwei Gao ◽  
Qing You ◽  
Hongfu Fan ◽  
Wenhui Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Enhanced Oil Recovery ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Control Agent ◽  
Mobility Control ◽  
Low Permeability ◽  
Co2 Flooding ◽  
Smart Mobility ◽  
Low Permeability Reservoirs
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document