Solid Fast-Track Evaluation Methodology: Supporting the Decision-Making Process in the Development of Mature Assets

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rubén Dario Gutiérrez Bedoya ◽  
Claudio Marcelo Fonseca ◽  
Michelle Alba Naranjo Leon

Abstract As most oilfields in Ecuador are approaching to the end of the service contracts under an advanced degree of maturity, it was imperative to implement a fast-track integrated methodology that supports the decisionmaking process during assets' evaluation. This practice aimed to identify new business opportunities and assure the rehabilitation of brownfields. These fields became a target for investors willing to intervene in new joint ventures with moderate risk to boost production and returns. The methodology is prepared to overcome specific challenges such as severe reservoir pressure depletion, harsh water management issues, facilities constraints and integrity. All this while keeping economics and safe operational standards. This process is divided into five stages: First, the diagnosis of field challenges and associated risks, so that review the current status of subsurface and surface aspects. Then, the following three parallel phases are focused on the study of reservoir architecture, dynamics and performance. Finally, the remaining potential of the asset is assessed by integrating action plans to take advantage of current facilities capacities. This workflow was implemented for the evaluation of three assets: Asset 1: Mature field with a secondary gas cap where its current reservoir pressure is 800 psia (initial pressure 4,200 psia). The asset was evaluated in fifteen (15) days resulting in an integrated solution with 14 activities: conversions to injectors, water source, upsizing, reactivations, change zone, and new wells. The results presented an incremental recovery factor of 6% (by 2028) with an expected production peak of 3,500 BOPD (by 2021). Asset 2: A field producing from two main reservoirs with harsh water management issues under a non-monitored waterflooding scheme with challenging sweet spots identification was evaluated in 10 days, resulting in a redevelopment plan considering: production losses optimization, sixteen (16) activities: workovers, dual completions, new wells, reentry, shut-in, and conversion to water injectors. This evaluation delivered an incremental recovery factor of 10% (by 2029). Asset 3: Producing for around one-hundred (100) years with 3,000 wells drilled. There was a lack of pressure support and facilities and well completions integrity. The fast-track assessment focused on production optimization lasted fifteen (15) days, resulting in one-hundred eighteen (118) wells for reactivation representing an additional recovery factor of 3% (by 2029). This work supported the process for contract's renegotiation and assets' acquisition. This integrated methodology aimed to maximize the assets' value while considering the involved shareholders' needs. Each asset was analysed in an integrated and collaborative manner through the propper resources identification and the usage of the latest technology and workflows. High-resolution reservoir simulation, complex python scripts, and a chemical processes simulator were used to perform an in-depth evaluation and meet the expectations.

2015 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
MS Shah ◽  
HMZ Hossain

Decline curve analysis of well no KTL-04 from the Kailashtila gas field in northeastern Bangladesh has been examined to identify their natural gas production optimization. KTL-04 is one of the major gas producing well of Kailashtila gas field which producing 16.00 mmscfd. Conventional gas production methods depend on enormous computational efforts since production systems from reservoir to a gathering point. The overall performance of a gas production system is determined by flow rate which is involved with system or wellbore components, reservoir pressure, separator pressure and wellhead pressure. Nodal analysis technique is used to performed gas production optimization of the overall performance of the production system. F.A.S.T. Virtu Well™ analysis suggested that declining reservoir pressure 3346.8, 3299.5, 3285.6 and 3269.3 psi(a) while signifying wellhead pressure with no changing of tubing diameter and skin factor thus daily gas production capacity is optimized to 19.637, 24.198, 25.469, and 26.922 mmscfd, respectively.Bangladesh J. Sci. Ind. Res. 50(1), 29-38, 2015


2021 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 35-38
Author(s):  
Rashid Kafiatullin

Oil reservoir pressure maintenance pumps are often pushed to operate significantly outside of their original design parameters. This can cause operating problems which impact their reliability and efficiency. The author offers the evaluation methodology for energy parameters and energy saving potential of oil reservoir pressure maintenance pumps in order to develop major pump parameters like efficiency, pressure, and specific electric power. The methodology was tested on 42 pump units. The values of variations of basic parameters indicate the energy saving potential of pump units.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 17-35
Author(s):  
Hamzah Amer Abdulameer ◽  
Dr. Sameera Hamd-Allah

As the reservoir conditions are in continuous changing during its life, well production rateand its performance will change and it needs to re-model according to the current situationsand to keep the production rate as high as possible.Well productivity is affected by changing in reservoir pressure, water cut, tubing size andwellhead pressure. For electrical submersible pump (ESP), it will also affected by numberof stages and operating frequency.In general, the production rate increases when reservoir pressure increases and/or water cutdecreases. Also the flow rate increase when tubing size increases and/or wellhead pressuredecreases. For ESP well, production rate increases when number of stages is increasedand/or pump frequency is increased.In this study, a nodal analysis software was used to design one well with natural flow andother with ESP. Reservoir, fluid and well information are taken from actual data of Mishrifformation-Nasriya oil field/ NS-5 well. Well design steps and data required in the modelwill be displayed and the optimization sensitivity keys will be applied on the model todetermine the effect of each individual parameter or when it combined with another one.


2008 ◽  
Vol 11 (04) ◽  
pp. 778-791 ◽  
Author(s):  
Secaeddin Sahin ◽  
Ulker Kalfa ◽  
Demet Celebioglu

Summary The Bati Raman field is the largest oil field in Turkey and contains approximately 1.85 billion bbl of oil initially in place. The oil is heavy (12°API), with high viscosity and low solution-gas content. Primary recovery was less than 2% of oil originally in place (OOIP). Over the period of primary recovery (1961-86), the reservoir underwent extensive pressure depletion from 1,800 psig to as low as 400 psig in some regions, resulting in a production decline from 9,000 to 1,600 STB/D. In March 1986, a carbon-dioxide (CO2) -injection pilot in a 1,200-acre area containing 33 wells was initiated in the western portion of the field. The gas-injection was initially cyclic. In 1988, the gas injection scheme was converted to a CO2-flood process. Later, the process was extended to cover the whole field. A peak daily production rate of 13,000 STB/D was achieved, whereas rate would have been less than 1,600 STB/D without CO2 application. However, the field has undergone a progressive production decline since 1995to recent levels of approximately 5,500 STB/D. Polymer-gel treatments were carried out to increase the CO2 sweep efficiency. Multilateral- and horizontal-well technology also was applied on a pilot scale to reach the bypassed oil. A water-alternating-gas (WAG) application has been applied extensively in the western part of the field. Current production is 7,000 STB/D. This paper documents more than 25 years of experience of the Turkish Petroleum Corporation (TPAO) on the design and operation of this full-field immiscible CO2-injection project conducted in the Bati Raman oil field in Turkey. The objective is to update the current status report, update the reservoir/field problems that TPAO has encountered (unpredictable problems and results), and provide a critical evaluation of the success of the project. Introduction The Bati Raman field is the biggest oil accumulation in Turkey and is operated by TPAO. It contains very viscous and low-API-gravity oil in a very challenging geological environment. Because of the fact that the recovery factor by primary recovery was limited, several enhanced-oil-recovery (EOR) techniques had been proposed and tested at the pilot level in the 1970s and 1980s. On the basis of the success of the laboratory tests and the vast amount of CO2 available in a neighboring field, which is only 55 miles away from the Bati Raman field, huff ‘n’ puff injection was started in the early 1980s. Because of the early breakthrough of CO2 in offset wells in a short period of time, the project was converted to field-scale random-pattern continuous injection. During more than 20 years of injection, the recovery peaked at approximately 13,000 STB/D and began to decline, reaching today's value of approximately 7,000 STB/D. In the case of Bati Raman, in its mature, the injected agent is bypassing the remaining oil and production is curtailed by excessively high gas/oil ratios (GORs). The naturally fractured character of the reservoir rock has been a challenge for establishing successful 3D conformance from the beginning, and its impact is even more pronounced in the later stages of the process. Therefore, the field requires modifications in the reservoir-management scheme to improve the recovery factor and to improve productivity of the current wells.


Water ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 972
Author(s):  
Stephen L. Katz ◽  
Julie C. Padowski ◽  
Michael Goldsby ◽  
Michael P. Brady ◽  
Stephanie E. Hampton

There is an increasing appreciation that food–energy–water (FEW) nexus problems are approaching criticality in both the developing and developed world. As researchers and managers attempt to address these complex resource management issues, the concept of the FEW nexus has generated a rapidly growing footprint in global sustainability discourse. However, this momentum in the FEW nexus space could be better guided if researchers could more clearly identify what is and is not a FEW problem. Without this conceptual clarity, it can be difficult to defend the position that FEW innovations will produce desired outcomes and avoid unintended consequences. Here we examine the growing FEW nexus scholarship to critically evaluate what features are necessary to define a FEW nexus. This analysis suggests that the FEW nexus differs from sector-focused natural resource or sustainability problems in both complexity and stakes. It also motivates two new foci for research: the identification of low-dimension indexes of FEW system status and approaches for identifying boundaries of specific FEW nexuses.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document