A Geochemical Technique for Formation Evaluation and Oil Water Contact OWC Identification in a Mature Tight Carbonate Reservoir Field in Abu Dhabi, UAE

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Syed Asif Ahsan ◽  
Vijaya Dantla ◽  
Mochamad Arief Firmansjah ◽  
Tamer Koksalan
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nasser Faisal Al-Khalifa ◽  
Mohammed Farouk Hassan ◽  
Deepak Joshi ◽  
Asheshwar Tiwary ◽  
Ihsan Taufik Pasaribu ◽  
...  

Abstract The Umm Gudair (UG) Field is a carbonate reservoir of West Kuwait with more than 57 years of production history. The average water cut of the field reached closed to 60 percent due to a long history of production and regulating drawdown in a different part of the field, consequentially undulating the current oil/water contact (COWC). As a result, there is high uncertainty of the current oil/water contact (COWC) that impacts the drilling strategy in the field. The typical approach used to develop the field in the lower part of carbonate is to drill deviated wells to original oil/water contact (OOWC) to know the saturation profile and later cement back up to above the high-water saturation zone and then perforate with standoff. This method has not shown encouraging results, and a high water cut presence remains. An innovative solution is required with a technology that can give a proactive approach while drilling to indicate approaching current oil/water contact and geo-stop drilling to give optimal standoff between the bit and the detected water contact (COWC). Recent development of electromagnetic (EM) look-ahead resistivity technology was considered and first implemented in the Umm Gudair (UG) Field. It is an electromagnetic-based signal that can detect the resistivity features ahead of the bit while drilling and enables proactive decisions to reduce drilling and geological or reservoir risks related to the well placement challenges.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 95-113
Author(s):  
Wisam I. Al-Rubaye ◽  
Dhiaa S. Ghanem ◽  
Hussein Mohammed Kh ◽  
Hayder Abdulzahra ◽  
Ali M. Saleem ◽  
...  

In petroleum industry, an accurate description and estimation of the Oil-Water Contact(OWC) is very important in quantifying the resources (i.e. original oil in place (OIIP)), andoptimizing production techniques, rates and overall management of the reservoir. Thus,OWC accurate estimation is crucial step for optimum reservoir characterization andexploration. This paper presents a comparison of three different methods (i.e. open holewell logging, MDT test and capillary pressure drainage data) to determine the oil watercontact of a carbonate reservoir (Main Mishrif) in an Iraqi oil field "BG”. A total of threewells from "BG" oil field were evaluated by using interactive petrophysics software "IPv3.6". The results show that using the well logging interpretations leads to predict OWCdepth of -3881 mssl. However, it shows variance in the estimated depth (WELL X; -3939,WELL Y; -3844, WELL Z; -3860) mssl, which is considered as an acceptable variationrange due to the fact that OWC height level in reality is not constant and its elevation isusually changed laterally due to the complicated heterogeneity nature of the reservoirs.Furthermore, the results indicate that the MDT test can predict a depth of OWC at -3889mssl, while the capillary drainage data results in a OWC depth of -3879 mssl. The properMDT data and SCAL data are necessary to reduce the uncertainty in the estimationprocess. Accordingly, the best approach for estimating OWC is the combination of MDTand capillary pressure due to the field data obtained are more reliable than open hole welllogs with many measurement uncertainties due to the fact of frequent borehole conditions.


2021 ◽  
Vol 73 (01) ◽  
pp. 20-22
Author(s):  
Trent Jacobs

In the midst of an industry downturn last year, the Abu Dhabi National Oil Company (ADNOC) reached a new oil production ceiling of 4 million B/D. The UAE’s largest producer has no intentions of slowing down. By decade’s end, ADNOC expects to have raised its maximum daily output by another million barrels. To cross that milestone, the company has set its sights on mastering the tight, thin, and unconventional formations that dot the UAE’s subsurface landscape. One of the places where such developments are hoped to unfold soon is known as Field Q. Found in southeastern Abu Dhabi, Field Q sits above a tight carbonate reservoir that holds an estimated 600 million bbl of oil. But with a permeability ranging from 1 to 3 millidarcy and poor vertical communication, the reservoir and its barrels have proven difficult to cultivate economically - until recently. ADNOC has published new details of its first onshore pilot of a “fishbone stimulation” that involved using more than a hundred hollow needles to pierce as far as 40 ft into the reservoir rock. The additional drainage netted by the fishbone needles boosted production threefold in the test well, as compared with its traditionally completed neighbors on the same pad. ADNOC ran the pilot in the summer of 2019 and by the end of the year saw enough production data to launch a wider 10-well pilot that remains underway. Based on a longer-term data set from these wells, the company will decide whether to leap into a fieldwide deployment of the niche completions technology. In the meantime, the petrotechnical team in charge of the test projects have issued roundly positive reviews of the fishbone technique in two recently presented technical papers (SPE 202636; SPE 203086) from the Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition & Conference (ADIPEC). “There is a chance that the fishbone-stimulated wells can avoid the drilling of multiple wells targeting different sublayers in the same zone,” said Rama Rao Rachapudi, listing one of several of the technology’s advantages over other approaches that were considered. The senior petroleum engineer with ADNOC, who is one of several authors of the papers that cover both the drilling and completions aspects of the pilot, shared during ADIPEC that his onshore team found motivation to test the technology after bringing in a batch of dis-mal appraisal wells. The fishbone system, also known as multilateral jetting stimulation technology, has been a specialized application ever since it was introduced just over a decade ago. Underscoring the potential impact of the current round of pilots on the technology’s adoption rate, ADNOC noted there were only around 30 worldwide fishbone deployments prior to this project. Most of those have been in the Middle East’s naturally fractured and layered carbonate formations - just like those of Field Q.


2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manhal Sirat ◽  
Xing Zhang ◽  
Janelle Simon ◽  
Aurifullah Vantala ◽  
Magdalena Povstyanova

2021 ◽  
Vol 73 (07) ◽  
pp. 58-59
Author(s):  
Chris Carpenter

This article, written by JPT Technology Editor Chris Carpenter, contains highlights of paper SPE 202636, “Fishbone Stimulation: A Game Changer for Tight Carbonate Productivity Enhancement—Case Study of First Successful Implementation at ADNOC Onshore Fields,” by R.V. Rachapudi, SPE, S.S. Al-Jaberi, SPE, and M. Al Hashemi, SPE, ADNOC, et al., prepared for the 2020 Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference, Abu Dhabi, held virtually 9–12 November. The paper has not been peer reviewed. The operator’s first successful installation of fishbone stimulation technology was aimed at establishing vertical communication between layers in a tight carbonate reservoir and maximizing the reservoir contact. Furthermore, the advanced stimulation technology connects natural fractures within the reservoir, bypasses near-wellbore damage, and allows the thin sublayers to produce. This technology requires running standard lower-completion tubing with fishbone subs preloaded with 40-ft needles and stimulation with the rig on site. Introduction The operator plans to develop tight carbonate reservoirs as part of its production growth strategy. Field Q is a 35×15-km field under development with a phased approach. Phase 1 was planned and production began in 2014. Phase 2 is being developed by drilling wells using the pad concept. Reservoir A, a tight carbonate formation with low permeability ranging from 1 to 3 md and porosity from 15 to 25%, is part of Phase 2 development. The aver-age thickness of Reservoir A is approximately 90 ft across the field, with seven sublayers. The major challenge of Reservoir A development is poor vertical communication and low permeability. Based on appraisal-well data, the average production rate per well is approximately 200 to 400 BOPD with a wellhead pressure of 200 psi. Therefore, appraisal-well testing confirmed the poor productivity of the wells. In addition, the wells are required to produce to the central facilities located in a Phase 1 area 18 km away from Phase 2. In summary, each Phase 2 well is required to be produced against a back-pressure of 500 to 600 psi. Fishbone Stimulation Technology Fishbone stimulation technology is an uncemented-liner rig-deployed completion stimulation system. The liner includes fishbone subs at fixed intervals, and each sub consists of four needles that will connect the sublayers by penetrating into the formation. The typical fishbone completion after installation and jetting the needles in formation is shown in Fig. 1.


2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philippe Al Khoury ◽  
Amit Kumar Sinha ◽  
Abdel Ghani Gueddoud ◽  
Amr Mohamed Serry

2021 ◽  
Vol 73 (06) ◽  
pp. 58-59
Author(s):  
Chris Carpenter

This article, written by JPT Technology Editor Chris Carpenter, contains highlights of paper SPE 203226, “First Multistage Fracturing of Horizontal Well Drilled in a Conventional Tight Carbonate Reservoir in an Onshore Field in the UAE: Challenges and Lessons Learned,” by Muhammad Aftab, SPE, Noor Talib, and Maad Subaihi, ADNOC, et al., prepared for the 2020 Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference, Abu Dhabi, held virtually 9–12 November. The paper has not been peer reviewed. The reservoir upon which this case study is focused is a tight, low-permeability carbonate reservoir with thin layers. The objective of the field case was to increase and sustain productivity of a pilot well consisting of an openhole completion. The complete paper summarizes the design processes, selection criteria, challenges, and lessons learned during design and execution phases. The study may provide a potential approach for selecting the proper hydraulic fracturing method and technique in similar cases. Introduction Reservoir X is divided into six layers. Layers X-3 through X-6 have reasonable porosity development; valid pressure points exist in X-3 and X-6. Pumpout was performed while collecting samples from X-3 and X-6, followed by short buildups. Production-logging-tool measurement was performed and found two major oil-producing layers across X-3 (60% of total production) and X-6 (40% of total production). The remaining intervals of the perforation were almost inactive. Petrophyscial and testing results of vertical Well A resulted in a decision to drill a horizontal oil producer (Well B) through Layer X-3. Well B was steered with a 2,220-ft horizontal length, out of which 1,930 ft was inside X-3 and 290 ft were above X-3 be-cause of a fault throw of 16 ft true vertical depth. The well was steered with a horizontal length of 2,080 ft in X-6. Well B was completed with a 3½-in. completion and horizontal section as an openhole. Matrix stimulation using coiled tubing was performed with 15% hydrochloric acid in Well B. The well ceased to flow after 2 weeks of declining production. Rapid pressure depletion was observed in Well B. Localized depletion around the wellbore was anticipated because of poor matrix/matrix connectivity. After comprehensive studies and risk assessments, the decision was made to recomplete Well B with a cemented fracturing string to perform hydraulic fracturing with the plug-and-perf technique. This technique will allow flexibility of stage count and stage spacing and a multi-cluster design to maximize the stimulated reservoir volume (SRV) along the upper, middle, and lower layers. In addition, the operator and service provider collaborated to enhance this design through a zero-overflush technique with diverting agents. The complete paper provides a detailed discussion of the core measurement and 1D mechanical Earth model used in the hydraulic fracturing design. Hydraulic Fracturing Design The main challenge in fracturing Well B was to ensure that the fracture generated is contained within the reservoir. Well B is completed in two layers (X-3 and X-6). The bottom part of the well is in X-6 and close to another underlying reservoir (Fig. 1).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document