Implementation of Data Driven Machine Learning Methods and Physics Driven Concepts for Real-Time Well Performance Estimation in Kashagan Field (Russian)

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adilbek Mursaliyev ◽  
Adilbek Kushekov ◽  
Ruslan Sultangaliyev
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Real Time ◽  
Performance Estimation ◽  
Data Driven ◽  
Well Performance ◽  
Learning Methods ◽  
Machine Learning Methods

Estimation of data-driven streamflow predicting models using machine learning methods

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tanveer Ahmed Siddiqi ◽  
Saima Ashraf ◽  
Sadiq Ali Khan ◽  
Muhammad Jawed Iqbal
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Data Driven ◽  
Learning Methods ◽  
Machine Learning Methods

scholarly journals Predicting rice blast disease: machine learning versus process-based models

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
David F. Nettleton ◽  
Dimitrios Katsantonis ◽  
Argyris Kalaitzidis ◽  
Natasa Sarafijanovic-Djukic ◽  
Pau Puigdollers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Rice Blast ◽  
Machine Learning Algorithms ◽  
Rice Blast Disease ◽  
Blast Disease ◽  
Data Driven ◽  
Learning Methods ◽  
Machine Learning Methods ◽  
Plant Disease Management ◽  
Process Based Models

Abstract Background In this study, we compared four models for predicting rice blast disease, two operational process-based models (Yoshino and Water Accounting Rice Model (WARM)) and two approaches based on machine learning algorithms (M5Rules and Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN)), the former inducing a rule-based model and the latter building a neural network. In situ telemetry is important to obtain quality in-field data for predictive models and this was a key aspect of the RICE-GUARD project on which this study is based. According to the authors, this is the first time process-based and machine learning modelling approaches for supporting plant disease management are compared. Results Results clearly showed that the models succeeded in providing a warning of rice blast onset and presence, thus representing suitable solutions for preventive remedial actions targeting the mitigation of yield losses and the reduction of fungicide use. All methods gave significant “signals” during the “early warning” period, with a similar level of performance. M5Rules and WARM gave the maximum average normalized scores of 0.80 and 0.77, respectively, whereas Yoshino gave the best score for one site (Kalochori 2015). The best average values of r and r2 and %MAE (Mean Absolute Error) for the machine learning models were 0.70, 0.50 and 0.75, respectively and for the process-based models the corresponding values were 0.59, 0.40 and 0.82. Thus it has been found that the ML models are competitive with the process-based models. This result has relevant implications for the operational use of the models, since most of the available studies are limited to the analysis of the relationship between the model outputs and the incidence of rice blast. Results also showed that machine learning methods approximated the performances of two process-based models used for years in operational contexts. Conclusions Process-based and data-driven models can be used to provide early warnings to anticipate rice blast and detect its presence, thus supporting fungicide applications. Data-driven models derived from machine learning methods are a viable alternative to process-based approaches and – in cases when training datasets are available – offer a potentially greater adaptability to new contexts.

scholarly journals Real-time prediction of inpatient length of stay for discharge prioritization

2015 ◽  
Vol 23 (e1) ◽  
pp. e2-e10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean Barnes ◽  
Eric Hamrock ◽  
Matthew Toerper ◽  
Sauleh Siddiqui ◽  
Scott Levin
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Real Time ◽  
Health Information ◽  
Patient Flow ◽  
Supervised Machine Learning ◽  
Youden Index ◽  
Learning Methods ◽  
Machine Learning Methods ◽  
High Resource ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Abstract Objective Hospitals are challenged to provide timely patient care while maintaining high resource utilization. This has prompted hospital initiatives to increase patient flow and minimize nonvalue added care time. Real-time demand capacity management (RTDC) is one such initiative whereby clinicians convene each morning to predict patients able to leave the same day and prioritize their remaining tasks for early discharge. Our objective is to automate and improve these discharge predictions by applying supervised machine learning methods to readily available health information. Materials and Methods The authors use supervised machine learning methods to predict patients’ likelihood of discharge by 2 p.m. and by midnight each day for an inpatient medical unit. Using data collected over 8000 patient stays and 20 000 patient days, the predictive performance of the model is compared to clinicians using sensitivity, specificity, Youden’s Index (i.e., sensitivity + specificity – 1), and aggregate accuracy measures. Results The model compared to clinician predictions demonstrated significantly higher sensitivity ( P  < .01), lower specificity ( P  < .01), and a comparable Youden Index ( P  > .10). Early discharges were less predictable than midnight discharges. The model was more accurate than clinicians in predicting the total number of daily discharges and capable of ranking patients closest to future discharge. Conclusions There is potential to use readily available health information to predict daily patient discharges with accuracies comparable to clinician predictions. This approach may be used to automate and support daily RTDC predictions aimed at improving patient flow.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document