MPD Called to a Post Well-Control Event to Free a Differentially Stuck Pipe

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akram Nabiyev ◽  
Sagar Nauduri ◽  
Martyn Parker ◽  
Darin Fisher ◽  
David Cunningham
Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
Vol 73 (04) ◽  
pp. 32-33
Author(s):  
Stephen Rassenfoss

A blowout in Ohio in 2018 was the first ever where the emissions could be measured from space, though it was at best a rough estimate based on data gathered on the 13th day after the XTO Energy well control event began. A year later, a blowout of a Devon well near Victoria, Texas, was measured starting the day after it occurred, with data collected on 3 days over the next 2 weeks. Using the measurement of carbon dioxide, it was estimated that the flare was 87% effective in burning about 4,800 metric tons of the leaking methane gas. Emission estimates varied wildly, and both the Ohio (Pandey et al. 2019) and Texas (Cusworth, Duren, Thorpe et al. 2020) efforts to use satellites led to technical papers to consider how they addressed this challenge. For those with blowouts next year, chances are a lot better methane-emission data would be available because of the launch of a constellation of specialized methane-measurement satellites by the two groups that played a key role in the earlier tests. In presentations at CERAWeek by IHS Markit, GHGSat said it has two methane-detection satellites in orbit and plans the launch of eight more, and the Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) said it is moving forward with the launch of its first one next year. Both are aiming to cover the lion’s share of oil and gas operations and measure the flow rate of the gas rather than concentrations in the atmosphere. They said they can do that far more accurately than was possible with the general-purpose climate observation satellites by focusing their equipment on the wavelength of methane. GHGSat said its satellites, which are about the size of a microwave oven, can measure the potent greenhouse gas from an elevation of 500 km and up. They are placed in polar orbit, which allows them to cover the globe every 2 weeks as the Earth rotates. Launching more satellites will allow more frequent looks. There are differences in the GHGSat and EDF designs, reflecting their contrasting missions. The Canadian company GHGSat, whose satellite initiative was initially supported by Schlumberger and the Oil and Gas Climate Initiative, is building tiny satellites with extremely high resolution to serve clients in the oil and mining businesses. During the presentation, Stéphane Germain, chief executive officer of GHGSat, displayed an image and said its satellites can tell if the methane is “coming from a particular facility and even tell what part of the facility it is coming from.” The company also sells the services of similarly equipped planes that can create more-detailed images using similar equipment at elevations of 3000 m and higher. EDF raised $100 million from donors, including Elon Musk, and has hired Raytheon to build a satellite equipped with a detector from Ball Aerospace. It can survey an area that is 260 km wide. That is far wider than the GHGSat satellites, which have the advantage of being able to zero in on smaller details when looking for leaks. The environmental group points out its device is more sensitive to methane emissions, detecting levels down to two parts per billion.


Author(s):  
Neil A Munro ◽  
Andy R Myers

ABSTRACT 1141381 The Montara (2009) and Macondo (2010) incidents resulted in step change in safety for the oil & gas industry. Since then many improvements have been implemented to keep the highest standard of safety in drilling operations. Through industry collaboration subsea well response equipment not available at the time of these incidents is now globally accessible. Technology continues to be developed to provide comprehensive response capabilities. A recent area of focus for industry was how to cap an incident well in water depths less than 600 meters where vertical access may not be possible due to hydrocarbons at surface and a possible gas boil in the case of a gas well. An innovative concept was developed, manufactured and tested to deal with a loss of well control event in shallow water. The Offset Installation System (OIS) allows a capping stack to be deployed and installed on a blowing out well in shallow water, deployed and controlled by vessels offset from the incident well. In addition, the OIS can be used for debris clearance, removal of the lower marine riser package (LMRP), and deployment of other subsea response hardware. By virtue of their source control operational function capping stacks are relatively large and heavy pieces of hardware. Despite these physical characteristics, there is expectation by stakeholders and international regulators for capability to transport capping stack equipment across significant distances in an expeditious manner to respond to an incident. For remote areas of the globe, capping stacks air transported as a single unit could provide an effective solution. A key objective in responding to a subsea loss of well control event is the ability to effectively mobilise source control equipment and trained personnel to readily manage an emergency response scenario in a timely manner globally. A number of companies with a range of capabilities will be required to provide a comprehensive response. To further assist, initiatives focused on personnel resources have been developed including a global subsea response network, and continuing industry collaboration for mutual aid of personnel. This paper will provide information on the development of the global subsea response equipment inventory available to industry. Latest developments such as OIS and air freightable capping stacks for transportation to remote areas will be discussed in detail as well as the above-mentioned initiatives for personnel.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharief Moghazy ◽  
Roger Van Noort ◽  
Anton Kozlov ◽  
Inam Haq ◽  
Thiago Silva ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nafiz Tamim ◽  
Geir Karlsen ◽  
Geert van Loopik ◽  
James Pettigrew

Author(s):  
R. Irawan

Leap frog concept was created to address the loss of single joint rig agility and drive the cycle time average lower than ever. The idea is to move the preparation step into a background activity that includes moving the equipment, killing the well, dismantling the wellhead and installing the well control equipment/BOP before the rig came in. To realize the idea, a second set of equipment is provided along with the manpower. By moving the preparation step, the goal is to eliminate a 50% portion of the job from the critical path. The practice is currently performed in tubing pump wells on land operations. However, the work concept could be implemented for other type of wells, especially ESP wells. After implementation, the cycle time average went down from 18 hours to 11 hours per job, or down by ~40%. The toolpusher also reports more focused operations due to reduced scope and less crew to work with, making the leap frog operation safer and more reliable. Splitting the routine services into 2 parts not only shortened the process but it also reduces noise that usually appear in the preparation process. The team are rarely seen waiting on moving support problems that were usually seen in the conventional process. Having the new process implemented, the team had successfully not only lowered cycle time, but also eliminated several problems in one step. Other benefits from leap frog implementation is adding rig count virtually to the actual physical rig available on location, and also adding rig capacity and completing more jobs compared to the conventional rig. In other parts, leap frog faced some limitation and challenges, such as: limited equipment capability for leap frog remote team to work on stuck plunger, thus hindering its leap frog capability, and working in un-restricted/un-clustered area which disturb the moving process and operation safety.


SPE Journal ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (04) ◽  
pp. 1470-1476 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ebrahim Hajidavalloo ◽  
Saeed Alidadi Dehkohneh

Summary When a blowout oil/gas well catches fire, usually a flow tube is used to detach the fire from the wellhead and provide appropriate conditions for operating team members to approach the well and install the blowout-preventer (BOP) cap. Using the flow tube above the wellhead creates powerful suction around the tube that may jeopardize the safety of crew members. To reduce the power of suction around the well, a new perforated flow tube instead of simple flow tube was introduced. To understand the effect of this new type of flow tube, modeling and simulation of the flow field around the blowout well were performed for both simple and perforated types of flow tube with Fluent 6.3.26 (2003) and Gambit 2.3.16 (2003) softwares. Different parameters around the well mouth were compared in both designs. The results showed that using the perforated flow tube decreases the vacuum around the well by 33% compared with the simple flow tubes. Thus, application of the perforated flow tube can be recommended in well-control operations for safety measures.


2009 ◽  
Vol 61 (01) ◽  
pp. 70-70
Author(s):  
David Barnett

Author(s):  
Majeed Abimbola ◽  
Faisal Khan ◽  
Vikram Garaniya ◽  
Stephen Butt

As the cost of drilling and completion of offshore well is soaring, efforts are required for better well planning. Safety is to be given the highest priority over all other aspects of well planning. Among different element of drilling, well control is one of the most critical components for the safety of the operation, employees and the environment. Primary well control is ensured by keeping the hydrostatic pressure of the mud above the pore pressure across an open hole section. A loss of well control implies an influx of formation fluid into the wellbore which can culminate to a blowout if uncontrollable. Among the factors that contribute to a blowout are: stuck pipe, casing failure, swabbing, cementing, equipment failure and drilling into other well. Swabbing often occurs during tripping out of an open hole. In this study, investigations of the effects of tripping operation on primary well control are conducted. Failure scenarios of tripping operations in conventional overbalanced drilling and managed pressure drilling are studied using fault tree analysis. These scenarios are subsequently mapped into Bayesian Networks to overcome fault tree modelling limitations such s dependability assessment and common cause failure. The analysis of the BN models identified RCD failure, BHP reduction due to insufficient mud density and lost circulation, DAPC integrated control system, DAPC choke manifold, DAPC back pressure pump, and human error as critical elements in the loss of well control through tripping out operation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document