Simple Numerical Simulations to Demonstrate Key Concepts Related to Coal Seam Gas Well Integrity

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iain Rodger ◽  
Andrew Garnett ◽  
Suzanne Hurter
2018 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 94
Author(s):  
Cameron R. Huddlestone-Holmes ◽  
Thomas G. Measham ◽  
Talia Jeanneret ◽  
James Kear

Decommissioning of wells and well pads (plugging and abandonment of the well and rehabilitation of the well pad) is an important activity in coal seam gas developments due to the large number of wells drilled and their co-location with other land uses. Successful decommissioning will need to be conducted in a way that is effective, efficient, complies with regulatory requirements and is socially acceptable. This study sought to understand the perspective of industry, government and local stakeholders on the decommissioning process and asked the question ‘what does successful decommissioning mean’? The study was conducted through workshops held in Camden, Chinchilla and Narrabri involving industry, government and local residents. All stakeholders agreed that the goal of successful decommissioning is to effectively have no legacy issues arising from the abandoned well or well pad, in perpetuity. However, there were differences in the confidence that stakeholders had in the process of achieving this outcome, largely based on the varying levels of understanding of well abandonment. This lack of confidence and understanding contributes to cross-cutting themes that emerged from the workshops. Local stakeholders expressed a strong desire for independent oversight and assessment of well abandonment processes, with increased transparency and access to information on abandoned wells in an understandable form. They also stated that long-term monitoring of wells post abandonment would assist in providing them with confidence that wells can be successfully decommissioned.


2019 ◽  
Vol 59 (2) ◽  
pp. 810
Author(s):  
Michael P. Scott

A significant increase in activity in the Queensland petroleum industry began around 2005 with the rapid growth of coal seam gas developments. The integrity of these drilled wells is paramount to the continued safe operation of the Queensland petroleum industry, ensuring no detrimental effect to safety, health and environment. The Queensland Petroleum and Gas Inspectorate (PGI) is responsible for monitoring industry compliance with well integrity management requirements under the regulatory framework. This is achieved through three proactive actions (engagement, inspections, audits) and three reactive actions (response to enquiries, complaints, incidents). This paper focuses on the well inspections and audits conducted by the PGI. The PGI conducts an annual program of well inspections as part of its risk-based compliance program. These inspections are in addition to the inspections performed by industry. Although recent inspections have found well integrity-related deficiencies requiring rectification, no major or systemic problems have been identified. In fact, industry generally appears to be proactively addressing any deficiencies they find through their own well integrity management processes. The PGI is in the process of ensuring a renewed focus on well integrity during its own well inspections through structured and standardised inspections that have clear aims. This is part of a continuous improvement process and is a risk-based decision informed by the data that have been gathered. This will help ensure the program is not simply focused on quantity of inspections, but also on outcomes and quality. To complement the well inspection program, several audits have been conducted over the past 4–5 years. As part of this, in the first quarter of 2019, the PGI began conducting audits of the well integrity management systems (WIMS) of the four major coal seam gas producers. The results of this audit show improvement in both WIMS documentation and the implementation of those systems. Future PGI work in this area includes continuing with the recent audit programs, reviewing inspection processes and a plan to increase focus on plug and abandoned wells over the next 18 months.


2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Durant ◽  
T. Francis ◽  
R. L. Braikenridge ◽  
M. Roy
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. 90
Author(s):  
Jason King ◽  
Brandon Yeong

Queensland coal seam gas (CSG) company Arrow Energy (Arrow) has implemented a safer, more efficient and cost effective approach to the transportation and supply of well materials to site. This paper examines Arrow’s approach to mitigating the transportation risks. It looks at current transport health, safety and environment (HSE) challenges, approach to address these risks, outcomes and future opportunities. The movement of well materials has been a concern for Arrow; it is a repetitive activity because wells are drilled, completed and worked over on a regular basis. Arrow’s challenge was to determine a better and safer way to load, unload and transport these materials. To address this material handling risk, an Arrow team developed a specially modified 40-foot flat rack (FR) capable of safely and securely holding a variety of materials. The FR can be picked up by a side-loader truck (swing-lifter), thereby enabling autonomous and safe loading and unloading. Warehouse staff can pre-pack all materials, thereby saving significant time for loading and unloading. Time and resources are also saved at the rig site where the FR can be unloaded autonomously. This unique design reduces human interaction and improves HSE personal safety risk significantly. A continuous improvement approach to further enhance the FR design to achieve better efficiency and safety for staff, as well as expanding its use to other business areas, is a key priority to Arrow.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document