Look-Ahead Vertical Seismic Profiling VSP Inversion Approach for Density and Velocity in Bayesian Framework

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed M. Daoud ◽  
Muhammad A. Abd El Dayem
GeoArabia ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 531-550
Author(s):  
Osman S. Khaled ◽  
Alaa M. Al-Ateeqi ◽  
Andrew R. James ◽  
Richard J. Meehan

ABSTRACT During early 1994, Kuwait Oil Company and Schlumberger completed an extensive study of the Seismic-While-Drilling technique in two development wells in the Raudhatain field of North Kuwait. Seismic-While-Drilling records the energy radiated from a working drillbit (utilized as a seismic source), with receivers placed at the surface. This technology provides well seismic information such as checkshot and look ahead Vertical Seismic Profiling services at the wellsite, in real-time. The technique does not interfere with the drilling process nor does it require deploying any downhole hardware. The result of the study is that the Seismic-While-Drilling technique can work successfully in the Raudhatain field.


Geophysics ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 71 (4) ◽  
pp. F79-F90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jo Eidsvik ◽  
Ketil Hokstad

We study seismic traveltime measurements acquired in the borehole, including vertical seismic profiling, seismic measurements while drilling, and drill-bit noise generated data. These traveltime data are used to assess informative parameters, including drill-bit position, distance to drilling target, and parameters of the velocity model. First, we analyze seismic traveltime data using a simple hyperbolic traveltime equation for rays between surface sampling locations and the drill bit. Second, we describe a model for estimating both the position of the drill bit and the relative distance to geologic interfaces ahead of the bit. Finally, we present a dynamic Bayesian strategy for real-time prediction of drill-bit positions, velocity parameters, and distances to geologic markers. Walk-away vertical seismic profiling data from the Norwegian Sea are used to demonstrate our methods. For this data set, we pick five key reflectors ahead of the drill bit. The deepest reflector is estimated to be [Formula: see text] ahead of the drill bit, using seismic traveltime data alone. The effects of aperture and surface sampling locations are large on our estimates and their associated uncertainties, and we observe that large offset is preferable to dense sampling in terms of positioning accuracy.


Geophysics ◽  
1988 ◽  
Vol 53 (1) ◽  
pp. 76-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. L. Majer ◽  
T. V. McEvilly ◽  
F. S. Eastwood ◽  
L. R. Myer

In a pilot vertical seismic profiling study, P-wave and cross‐polarized S-wave vibrators were used to investigate the potential utility of shear‐wave anisotropy measurements in characterizing a fractured rock mass. The caprock at The Geysers geothermal field was found to exhibit about an 11 percent velocity variation between SH-waves and SV-waves generated by rotating the S-wave vibrator orientation to two orthogonal polarizations for each survey level in the well. The effect is generally consistent with the equivalent anisotropy expected from the known fracture geometry.


Geophysics ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 62 (5) ◽  
pp. 1365-1368
Author(s):  
M. Boulfoul ◽  
Doyle R. Watts

The petroleum exploration industry uses S‐wave vertical seismic profiling (VSP) to determine S‐wave velocities from downgoing direct arrivals, and S‐wave reflectivities from upgoing waves. Seismic models for quantitative calibration of amplitude variation with offset (AVO) data require S‐wave velocity profiles (Castagna et al., 1993). Vertical summations (Hardage, 1983) of the upgoing waves produce S‐wave composite traces and enable interpretation of S‐wave seismic profile sections. In the simplest application of amplitude anomalies, the coincidence of high amplitude P‐wave reflectivity and low amplitude S‐wave reflectivity is potentially a direct indicator of the presence of natural gas.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document