Data-Driven Prediction of In-Situ Combustion Dynamics

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olufolake Ogunbanwo ◽  
Kuy Hun Koh Yoo ◽  
Margot Gerritsen ◽  
Anthony R. Kovscek
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Klemens Katterbauer ◽  
Abdulaziz Qasim ◽  
Alberto Marsala ◽  
Ali Yousef

Abstract Hydrogen has become a very promising green energy source that can be easily stored and transported, and it has the potential to be utilized in a variety of applications. Hydrogen, as a power source, has the benefits of being easily transportable and stored over long periods of times, and does not lead to any carbon emissions related to the utilization of the power source. Thermal EOR methods are among the most commonly used recovery methods. They involve the introduction of thermal energy or heat into the reservoir to raise the temperature of the oil and reduce its viscosity. The heat makes the oil mobile and assists in moving it towards the producer wells. The heat can be added externally by injecting a hot fluid such as steam or hot water into the formations, or it can be generated internally through in-situ combustion by burning the oil in depleted gas or waterflooded reservoirs using air or oxygen. This method is an attractive alternative to produce cost-efficiently significant amounts of hydrogen from these depleted or waterflooded reservoirs. A major challenge is to optimize injection of air/oxygen to maximize hydrogen production via ensuring that the in-situ combustion sufficiently supports the breakdown of water into hydrogen molecules. In-situ combustion or fireflood is a method consisting of volumes of air or oxygen injected into a well and ignited. A burning zone is propagated through the reservoir from the injection well to the producing wells. The in-situ combustion creates a bank of steam, gas from the combustion process, and evaporated hydrocarbons that drive the reservoir oil into the producing wells. There are three types of in-situ combustion processes: dry forward, dry reverse and wet forward combustion. In a dry forward process only air is injected and the combustion front moves from the injector to the producer. The wet forward injection is the same process where air and water are injected either simultaneously or alternating. Artificial intelligence (AI) practices have allowed to significantly improve optimization of reservoir production, based on observations in the near wellbore reservoir layers. This work utilizes a data-driven physics-inspired AI model for the optimization of hydrogen recovery via the injection of oxygen, where the injection and production parameters are optimized, minimizing oxygen injection while maximizing hydrogen production and recovery. Multiple physical and data-driven models and their parameters are optimized based on observations with the objective to determine the best sustainable combination. The framework was examined on a synthetic reservoir model with multiple injector and producing wells. Historical injection and production were available for a time period of three years for various oxygen injection and hydrogen production levels. Various time-series deep learning network models were investigated, with random forest time series models incorporating a modified mass balance – reaction kinetics model for in-situ combustion performing most effectively. A robust global optimization approach, based on an artificial intelligence genetic optimization, allows for simultaneously optimization of an injection pattern and uncertainty quantification. Results indicate potential for significant reduction in required oxygen injection volumes, while maximizing hydrogen recovery. This work represents a first and innovative approach to enhance hydrogen recovery from waterflooded reservoirs via oxygen injection. The data-driven physics inspired AI genetic optimization framework allows to optimize oxygen injection while maximizing hydrogen production.


2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Berna Hascakir ◽  
Louis Marie Castanier ◽  
Anthony Robert Kovscek

SPE Journal ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 16 (03) ◽  
pp. 524-536 ◽  
Author(s):  
B.. Hasçakir ◽  
G.. Glatz ◽  
L.M.. M. Castanier ◽  
A.R.. R. Kovscek

Summary One method to access unconventional, heavy-oil resources is to apply in-situ combustion (ISC) to oxidize in place a small fraction of the hydrocarbon, thereby providing heat and pressure that enhances recovery. ISC is also attractive because it provides the opportunity to upgrade oil in situ by increasing the API gravity and decreasing, for instance, sulfur content. Despite a considerable literature on ISC dynamics, the propagation of a combustion front through porous media has never been visualized directly. We use X-ray computed tomography (CT) to monitor ISC movement, displacement-front shape, and thickness in a 1-m-long "combustion" tube. Temperature-profile history, liquid production, and effluent gas data are also obtained. Tests employ an 8.65°API heavy crude oil and representative sand. The general trend of saturation profiles is defined through spatially and temporally varying CT numbers. The role of initial oil and water saturations is examined by packing the combustion tube with either multiple samples with different saturations or by filling it with a uniform sample. Our work quantifies that ISC fronts display instabilities on a fine scale (cm). ISC reactions appear to add to front instability in comparison to inert gas advance. The pressure gradients during ISC appear to influence grain arrangement for loose packing. These grain arrangements cause combustion-front fingering, suggesting that the geomechanical state is relevant to combustion. These new data advance the knowledge base significantly by providing a data set for benchmarking of ISC simulations.


Author(s):  
Lucas Henrique Pagoto Deoclecio ◽  
Filipe Arthur Firmino Monhol ◽  
Antônio Carlos Barbosa Zancanella

2018 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 405-418
Author(s):  
Cristina ITALIANO ◽  
Lidia PINO ◽  
Massimo LAGANÀ ◽  
Antonio VITA

Fuel ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 284 ◽  
pp. 118972
Author(s):  
Dong Liu ◽  
Junshi Tang ◽  
Ruonan Zheng ◽  
Qiang Song

2017 ◽  
Vol 114 ◽  
pp. 685-692
Author(s):  
Fabián E. Cano Ardila ◽  
Andrés A. Amell Arrieta

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document