Optimising Flow Assurance Strategies in an Offshore Sandstone Oil Field with Gas Hydrate Issues

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Babalola Daramola ◽  
Chidubem Martins Alinnor
Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Babalola Daramola

Abstract This publication presents how an oil asset unlocked idle production after numerous production upsets and a gas hydrate blockage. It also uses economics to justify facilities enhancement projects for flow assurance. Field F is an offshore oil field with eight subsea wells tied back to a third party FPSO vessel. Field F was shut down for turnaround maintenance in 2015. After the field was brought back online, one of the production wells (F5) failed to flow. An evaluation of the reservoir, well, and facilities data suggested that there was a gas hydrate blockage in the subsea pipeline between the well head and the FPSO vessel. A subsea intervention vessel was then hired to execute a pipeline clean-out operation, which removed the gas hydrate, and restored F5 well oil production. To minimise oil production losses due to flow assurance issues, the asset team evaluated the viability of installing a test pipeline and a second methanol umbilical as facilities enhancement projects. The pipeline clean-out operation delivered 5400 barrels of oil per day production to the asset. The feasibility study suggested that installing a second methanol umbilical and a test pipeline are economically attractive. It is recommended that the new methanol umbilical is installed to guarantee oil flow from F5 and future infill production wells. The test pipeline can be used to clean up new wells, to induce low pressure wells, and for well testing, well sampling, water salinity evaluation, tracer evaluation, and production optimisation. This paper presents production upset diagnosis and remediation steps actioned in a producing oil field, and aids the justification of methanol umbilical capacity upgrade and test pipeline installations as facilities enhancement projects. It also indicates that gas hydrate blockage can be prevented by providing adequate methanol umbilical capacity for timely dosing of oil production wells.


Author(s):  
Bohui Shi ◽  
Shangfei Song ◽  
Yuchuan Chen ◽  
Xu Duan ◽  
Qingyun Liao ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivan Noville ◽  
Milena da Silva Maciel ◽  
Anna Luiza de Moraes y blanco de Mattos ◽  
João Gabriel Carvalho de Siqueira

Abstract This article's goal is to present some of the main flow assurance challenges faced by PETROBRAS in the Buzios oil field, from its early design stages to full operation, up to this day. These challenges include: hydrate formation in WAG (Water Alternating Gas) operations; reliability of the chemical injection system to prevent scale deposition; increasing GLR (Gas Liquid Ratio) management and operations with extremely high flowrates. Flow assurance experience amassed in Buzios and in other pre-salt oil fields, regarding all these presented issues, is particularly relevant for the development of future projects with similar characteristics, such as high liquid flow rate, high CO2 content and high scaling potential.


2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andres Javier Chaustre Ruiz ◽  
John Jairo Ibagon ◽  
Elkin Alberto Leon Ramirez

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Bazvand M

Due to the growing demand for energy as well as the depletion of shallow land reservoirs, it sounds more important to utilize deep sea reservoirs. Due to their special conditions, drilling and production of these reservoirs face more problems. The science that helps us avoiding problems during operation is called flow assurance. One of the important issues in flow assurance is to prevent formation of gas hydrates. One of gas hydrates preventing methods is to use of inhibitors. Using of inhibitors is a cost- effective and eco-friendly method; so, it is used more nowadays. This paper introduces a new hydrate inhibitor that has been developed from the modification of one of the most widely used inhibitors present in the industry, Poly Vinyl Pyrrolidone, to improve its efficiency. The main structure of the paper is about what is the gas hydrate and its prevention methods. Finally, compare different inhibitors with new one. The results show that hydrate formation time for all polymers is approximately the same, while a half of new inhibitor in compare with amount of others inhibitors causes the same results. This matter shows a double efficiency, and this means a saving of double Polymer consumption.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marshall A Pickarts ◽  
Jose Delgado-Linares ◽  
Erika Brown ◽  
Vinod Veedu ◽  
Carolyn A. Koh

Abstract Numerous solids including gas hydrates, waxes, and asphaltenes have the potential to form in the production lines of gas and oil fields. This creates a highly non-ideal scenario as the accumulation of said species leads to flow assurance issues, especially with long-term processes like deposition. Since an ever-increasing amount of material is deposited in place at the pipe surface, production stoppage or active mitigation efforts become inevitable. The latter production issues result in increased safety risks and operational expenditures. Therefore, a cost-effective, passive deposition mitigation technology, such as a pipeline coating or surface treatment is especially appealing. The ability to address multiple pipeline flow assurance issues simultaneously without actively disrupting production would represent a dramatic step forward in this area. This study is part of a long-term ongoing effort that evaluates the performance and application of an omniphobic surface treatment for solids deposition prevention in industrially relevant systems. In particular, this specific work concentrates on the efficacy and robustness of the treatment under fully flowing conditions. The apparatuses utilized for this include two flowloops: a lab-scale, high-pressure flowloop for gas hydrate and surface treatment durability studies, and a bench-scale, atmospheric pressure loop for crude oil and asphaltene experiments. Film growth in high-pressure flowloop tests corroborated previous reports of delayed gas hydrate nucleation observed in rocking cells. Without the aid of the memory effect, treated oil-dominated experiments never experienced hydrate formation, spending upwards of a week in the hydrate stability zone (at the subcooled/fluid test conditions). Subsequent tests which utilized the memory effect then revealed that the hydrate formation rate reduced in the presence of the surface treatment compared to a bare stainless-steel surface. This testing was part of a larger set of trials conducted in the flowloop, which lasted about one year. The surface treatment durability under flowing conditions was evaluated during this time. Even after experiencing ∼4000 operating hours and 2 full pressure cycles, no evidence of delamination or damage was detected. Finally, as part of an extension to previous work, corroded surface asphaltene deposition experiments were performed in a bench-top flowloop. Treated experiments displayed an order of magnitude reduction in both total oil (all fractions of crude oil) and asphaltene fraction deposited.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruce W. E. Norris ◽  
Thomas B. Charlton ◽  
Michael L. Johns ◽  
Eric F. May ◽  
Zachary M. Aman

2015 ◽  
Vol 137 (03) ◽  
pp. S13-S15
Author(s):  
Phaneendra Kondapi

This article explores various aspects of flow assurance in subsea developments. Flow assurance is an understanding of multiphase flow fluid dynamics and analyses, an ability to identify flow-related problems using state-of-the-art prediction tools, and the knowledge to develop solutions that eliminate, mitigate or remediate flow-related issues encountered in subsea systems. Flow assurance is reliable, safe and cost-efficient management of hydrocarbons from reservoir to export without any flow-related issues over the life cycle of the oil field. Subsea developments continue to escalate in quantity and complexity as the exploration and production companies ramp up exploration of deep-water and ultra-deep-water reservoirs with complex formations in harsh environments with increased challenges. Some of the technologies under thermal solutions are thermal insulation, direct electric heating and electrically-heated pipe-in-pipe. Oil and gas companies generate revenue from the oil produced. If the oil flow stops, their revenue stops. The more it stops the more they lose cash. Hence it can be termed as cash flow assurance. With fluctuating oil prices and unpredictable production issues, engaging flow assurance at every stage starting with the early phase ensures uninterrupted transportation of reservoir fluid from pore to process facilities in a safe manner and insures cash flow.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhiming Deng ◽  
Zhiyuan Wang ◽  
Yang Zhao ◽  
Yanli Guo ◽  
Jianbo Zhang ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document