Logging While Drilling Fluid Sampling and Real Time Formation Evaluation, An Approach for a Successful Sampling Operation

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Correa ◽  
A. Barbosa
Keyword(s):  
Real Time ◽  
Drilling Fluid ◽  
Formation Evaluation ◽  
Sampling Operation ◽  
Logging While Drilling ◽  
Fluid Sampling

Dynamic Formation Evaluation to Reduce Uncertainty and Confirm Completed Intervals in Brown Fields

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhamad Aizat Kamaruddin ◽  
Ayham Ashqar ◽  
Muhammad Haniff Suhaimi ◽  
Fairus Azwardy Salleh
Keyword(s):  
Real Time ◽  
Optical Sensors ◽  
Sensor Technology ◽  
Innovative Technology ◽  
Fluid Type ◽  
Formation Evaluation ◽  
Reservoir Fluid ◽  
Logging While Drilling ◽  
Dynamic Formation

Abstract Uncertainties in fluid typing and contacts within Sarawak Offshore brown field required a real time decision. To enhance reservoir fluid characterisation and confirm reservoir connectivity prior to well final total depth (TD). Fluid typing while drilling was selected to assure the completion strategy and ascertain the fluvial reservoir petrophysical interpretation. Benefiting from low invasion, Logging While Drilling (LWD) sampling fitted with state of ART advanced spectroscopy sensors were deployed. Pressures and samples were collected. The well was drilled using synthetic base mud. Conventional logging while drilling tool string in addition to sampling tool that is equipped with advanced sensor technology were deployed. While drilling real time formation evaluation allowed selecting the zones of interest, while fluid typing was confirmed using continually monitored fluids pump out via multiple advanced sensors, contamination, and reservoir fluid properties were assessed while pumping. Pressure and sampling were performed in drilling mode to minimise reservoir damage, and optimise rig time, additionally sampling while drilling was performed under circulation conditions. Pressures were collected first followed by sampling. High success in collecting pressure points with a reliable fluid gradient that indicated a virgin reservoir allowed the selection of best completion strategy without jeopardising reserves, and reduced rig time. Total of seven samples from 3 different reservoirs, four oil, and three formation water. High quality samples were collected. The dynamic formation evaluation supported by while drilling sampling confirmed the reservoir fluid type and successfully discovered 39ft of oil net pay. Reservoir was completed as an oil producer. The Optical spectroscopy measurements allowed in situ fluid typing for the quick decision making. The use of advanced optical sensors allowed the sample collection and gave initial assessment on reservoir fluids properties, as a result cost saving due to eliminating the need for additional Drill Stem Test (DST) run to confirm the fluid type. Sample and formation pressures has confirmed reservoir lateral continuity in the vicinity of the field. The reservoir developed as thick and blocky sandstone. Collected sample confirmed the low contamination levels. Continuous circulation mitigated sticking and potential well-control risks. This is the first time in surrounding area, advanced optical sensors are used to aid LWD sampling and to finalize the fluid identification. The innovative technology allowed the collection of low contamination. The real-time in-situ fluid analysis measurement allowed critical decisions to be made real time, consequently reducing rig downtime. Reliable analysis of fluid type identification removed the need for additional run/service like DST etc.

Real-Time Formation Evaluation and Contamination Prediction Through Inversion of Downhole Fluid-Sampling Measurements

2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (02) ◽  
pp. 531-547 ◽  
Author(s):  
Morten Kristensen ◽  
Nikita Chugunov ◽  
Adriaan Gisolf ◽  
Mario Biagi ◽  
Francois Dubost
Keyword(s):  
Real Time ◽  
Formation Evaluation ◽  
Fluid Sampling

Real-Time Formation Evaluation and Contamination Prediction Through Inversion of Downhole Fluid Sampling Measurements

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Morten Kristensen ◽  
Nikita Chugunov ◽  
Adriaan Gisolf ◽  
Mario Biagi ◽  
Francois Dubost
Keyword(s):  
Real Time ◽  
Formation Evaluation ◽  
Fluid Sampling

Integration of Cutting Spectroscopy Analysis and Open-Hole Logs to Increase Evaluation Certainty of Complex Clastic Formations – Advantages and Limitations

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Alqunais ◽  
Charles Bradford ◽  
Khalid Qubaisi
Keyword(s):  
Real Time ◽  
Gamma Ray ◽  
Drilling Fluid ◽  
Major Elements ◽  
Driving Mechanism ◽  
Formation Evaluation ◽  
Xrf Analysis ◽  
Real Time Analysis ◽  
Open Hole ◽  
The Impact

Abstract This paper presents an approach by integrating advanced cutting analysis, such as x-ray fluorescence (XRF), and open-hole logs for enhanced formation evaluation of complex clastic formations in near real-time. To verify the methodology, results of surface cuttings analyses are compared to and validated with downhole elemental spectroscopy measurements. In general, when the formation contains clays, the minimum logging requirement to evaluate clastic formations is a triple combo (density, neutron and resistivity) with spectral gamma ray (SGR) logs. In addition to correcting the impact of the drilling fluid additives and properties such as the presence of k-formate in mud, SGR logs become very crucial to differentiate clay types present in the formation. In the absence of SGR, advanced cuttings measurements can be utilized to provide elemental data of major elements including SGR components from the cuttings in near real-time. A comparison was made to evaluate the cuttings analysis as a replacement for SGR. As a part of this work and to validate the petrophysical evaluation results, downhole wireline SGR and elemental spectroscopy data were acquired and compared to the analysis using advanced cutting measurements. This work was conducted in a siliciclastic formation containing abrasive sandstones of mixed clean quartz and clay minerals. The analysis of cuttings XRF was integrated with basic downhole logs to quantify the clay typing required for representative formation evaluation and well geosteering. Limitations of this approach are identified in drilling complex clastic formations including cutting sampling frequency and effects of drilling including drilling fluid contamination, mud additives, drilling parameters and drilling driving mechanism. Controlling these factors has led to good results from cuttings measurements. The advanced cuttings XRF analysis was benchmarked with wireline SGR and elemental spectroscopy logs. This approach of using cuttings XRF analysis and basic open-hole logs is a valid option for geosteering in a complex clastic mineralogy formation and providing a near real-time formation evaluation in the absence of spectral gamma ray or elemental spectroscopy. XRF has been proven to provide near real-time analysis with improved reliability across bad hole, wider spectrum of elements and eliminate critical operations risk. Recommendations to optimize the parameters for reliable measurements will be discussed in this paper.

scholarly journals Real-Time Measurement of Drilling Fluid Rheological Properties: A Review

Sensors ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (11) ◽  
pp. 3592
Author(s):  
Naipeng Liu ◽  
Di Zhang ◽  
Hui Gao ◽  
Yule Hu ◽  
Longchen Duan
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Rheological Properties ◽  
Real Time ◽  
Drilling Fluid ◽  
Time Measurement ◽  
Decision Making Process ◽  
Rate Of Penetration ◽  
The Real ◽  
Real Time Measurement ◽  
Fluid Properties

The accurate and frequent measurement of the drilling fluid’s rheological properties is essential for proper hydraulic management. It is also important for intelligent drilling, providing drilling fluid data to establish the optimization model of the rate of penetration. Appropriate drilling fluid properties can improve drilling efficiency and prevent accidents. However, the drilling fluid properties are mainly measured in the laboratory. This hinders the real-time optimization of drilling fluid performance and the decision-making process. If the drilling fluid’s properties cannot be detected and the decision-making process does not respond in time, the rate of penetration will slow, potentially causing accidents and serious economic losses. Therefore, it is important to measure the drilling fluid’s properties for drilling engineering in real time. This paper summarizes the real-time measurement methods for rheological properties. The main methods include the following four types: an online rotational Couette viscometer, pipe viscometer, mathematical and physical model or artificial intelligence model based on a Marsh funnel, and acoustic technology. This paper elaborates on the principle, advantages, limitations, and usage of each method. It prospects the real-time measurement of drilling fluid rheological properties and promotes the development of the real-time measurement of drilling rheological properties.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document