Conceptual Study for Sour Gas Processing Emphasized on Acid Gas Injection

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rendra B. Haristyawan ◽  
Mira Yuliatri ◽  
I. Totok Sugiarto ◽  
Adi F. M. Ringoringo ◽  
Tri P. Adhi
2007 ◽  
Vol 10 (05) ◽  
pp. 572-579 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jens Behrend ◽  
Shelin Chugh ◽  
Robert Aaron McKishnie

Summary OMV operates two producing sour-gas reservoirs in lower Austria: the Reyersdorfer dolomite (shallow reservoir) and the Schoenkirchen Uebertief dolomite (deep reservoir). A new, separate reservoir called the Perchtoldsdorfer dolomite (Strasshof Tief field) has been discovered, and options for how its acid gas can be handled are being investigated. The two currently producing reservoirs deliver to a gas plant with a 30-tonne/d sulfur plant. The sulfur plant is too small to accommodate the additional production. OMV has evaluated acid-gas injection as an alternative to a new, larger sulfur plant. Acid gas could be injected into either the Reyersdorfer dolomite or the Schoenkirchen Uebertief dolomite. In either case, injection would be occurring concurrently with production. The intent of this project was to determine at a scoping level if sufficient injectivity and storativity are available in either the Reyersdorfer dolomite or the Schoenkirchen Uebertief dolomite. Compositional modeling and the prognosis of the breakthrough time at the producing wells were carried out to determine the contamination risk to existing production. The simulation work included generating compositional numerical-simulation forecasts of production-rate/composition forecasts under concurrent injection/production scenarios; modeling in-situ miscibility and gravity-separation effects of acid gas; and evaluating risk scenarios for existing production to determine the optimal solution. Introduction OMV's recent discovery of the Strasshof Tief reservoir prompted a review of whether acid-gas injection could be a viable alternative to a new or expanded sulfur plant. The issues were whether to inject into the Reyersdorfer or Schoenkirchen Uebertief reservoirs (Figs. 1a through 1c and Fig. 2), how injection would affect the existing recoveries, when breakthrough would occur, and whether there would be sufficient injectivity and storativity in both reservoirs. A complicating factor in the analysis is that the size of the Strasshof Tief is unknown at this time (testing was scheduled for 2006). The composition of the Strasshof gas is also unknown, but it was estimated on the basis of Modular Formation Dynamic Tester (MDT)* samples from the Perchtoldsdorfer dolomite and the known composition of the adjacent sour-gas reservoirs in the dolomite rock. Our review of the problem was broken into two phases. The initial phase was a brief analytical review to estimate the injectivity and storativity of each reservoir and to assess which reservoir was clearly more suitable. In the second phase, the selected reservoir was simulated to determine breakthrough times and whether there was an impact on recovery. Because of the accelerated schedule of this project, where initial simulation results were necessary to initiate discussions with regulatory agencies and obtain approvals so that 2006 development plans could proceed, it was agreed that geological models would be built for both reservoirs immediately so that the simulation could proceed when a decision was made after the initial review.


2013 ◽  
Vol 37 ◽  
pp. 2505-2510 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qi Li ◽  
Xuehao Liu ◽  
Lei Du ◽  
Bing Bai ◽  
Zhiming Fang ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Erhui Luo ◽  
Zifei Fan ◽  
Yongle Hu ◽  
Lun Zhao ◽  
Jianjun Wang

Produced gas containing the acid gas reinjection is one of the effective enhanced oil recovery methods, not only saving costs of disposing acid gases and zero discharge of greenhouse gases but also supporting reservoir pressure. The subsurface fluid from the Carboniferous carbonate reservoir in the southern margin of the Pre-Caspian basin in Central Asia has low density, low viscosity, high concentrations of H2S (15%) and CO2 (4%), high solution gas/oil ratio. The reservoir is lack of fresh water because of being far away onshore. Pilot test has already been implemented for the acid gas reinjection. Firstly, in our work a scheme of crude oil composition grouping with 15 compositions was presented on the basis of bottomhole sampling from DSTs of four wells. After matching PVT physical experiments including viscosity, density and gas/oil ratio and pressure–temperature (P–T) phase diagram by tuning critical properties of highly uncertain heavy components, the compositional model with phase behavior was built under meeting accuracy of phase fitting, which was used to evaluate mechanism of miscibility development in the acid gas injection process. Then using a cell-to-cell simulation method, vaporizing and/or condensing gas drive mechanisms were investigated for mixtures consisting of various proportions of CH4, CO2 and H2S in the gas injection process. Moreover, effects of gas compositions on miscible mechanisms have also been determined. With the aid of pressure-composition diagrams and pseudoternary diagrams generated from the Equation of State (EoS), pressures of First Contact Miscibility (FCM) and Multiple Contact Miscibility (MCM) for various gases mixing with the reservoir oil sample under reservoir temperature were calculated. Simulation results show that pressures of FCM are higher than those of MCM, and CO2 and H2S are able to reduce the miscible pressure. At the same time, H2S is stronger. As the CH4 content increases, both pressures of FCM and MCM are higher. But incremental values of MCM decrease. In addition, calculated envelopes of pseudoternary diagrams for mixtures of CH4, CO2 and H2S gases of varying composition with acid gas injection have features of bell shape, hourglass shape and triangle shape, which can be used to identify vaporizing and/or condensing gas drives. Finally, comparison of the real produced gas and the one deprived of its C3+ was performed to determine types of miscibility and calculate pressures of FCM and MCM. This study provides a theoretical guideline for selection of injection gas to improve miscibility and oil recovery.


2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raymond A. Mireault ◽  
Rudi Stocker ◽  
David William Dunn ◽  
Mehran Pooladi-Darvish

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document