Light Oil Recovery From Cyclic CO2 Injection: Influence of Low Pressures Impure CO2, and Reservoir Gas

1991 ◽  
Vol 6 (01) ◽  
pp. 25-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
T.G. Monger ◽  
J.C. Ramos ◽  
Jacob Thomas
Fuel ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 174 ◽  
pp. 296-306 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinhua Ma ◽  
Xiangzeng Wang ◽  
Ruimin Gao ◽  
Fanhua Zeng ◽  
Chunxia Huang ◽  
...  

1991 ◽  
Vol 6 (02) ◽  
pp. 179-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.A. Thomas ◽  
T.G. Monger-McClure
Keyword(s):  

1992 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fatma Karim ◽  
T.V. Berzins ◽  
P.A. Schenewerk ◽  
Z.A. Bassiouni ◽  
J.M. Wolcott

Processes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 94
Author(s):  
Asep Kurnia Permadi ◽  
Egi Adrian Pratama ◽  
Andri Luthfi Lukman Hakim ◽  
Doddy Abdassah

A factor influencing the effectiveness of CO2 injection is miscibility. Besides the miscible injection, CO2 may also contribute to oil recovery improvement by immiscible injection through modifying several properties such as oil swelling, viscosity reduction, and the lowering of interfacial tension (IFT). Moreover, CO2 immiscible injection performance is also expected to be improved by adding some solvent. However, there are a lack of studies identifying the roles of solvent in assisting CO2 injection through observing those properties simultaneously. This paper explains the effects of CO2–carbonyl and CO2–hydroxyl compounds mixture injection on those properties, and also the minimum miscibility pressure (MMP) experimentally by using VIPS (refers to viscosity, interfacial tension, pressure–volume, and swelling) apparatus, which has a capability of measuring those properties simultaneously within a closed system. Higher swelling factor, lower viscosity, IFT and MMP are observed from a CO2–propanone/acetone mixture injection. The role of propanone and ethanol is more significant in Sample A1, which has higher molecular weight (MW) of C7+ and lower composition of C1–C4, than that in the other Sample A9. The solvents accelerate the ways in which CO2 dissolves and extracts oil, especially the extraction of the heavier component left in the swelling cell.


2004 ◽  
Vol 126 (2) ◽  
pp. 119-124 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. S. Shokoya ◽  
S. A. (Raj) Mehta ◽  
R. G. Moore ◽  
B. B. Maini ◽  
M. Pooladi-Darvish ◽  
...  

Flue gas injection into light oil reservoirs could be a cost-effective gas displacement method for enhanced oil recovery, especially in low porosity and low permeability reservoirs. The flue gas could be generated in situ as obtained from the spontaneous ignition of oil when air is injected into a high temperature reservoir, or injected directly into the reservoir from some surface source. When operating at high pressures commonly found in deep light oil reservoirs, the flue gas may become miscible or near–miscible with the reservoir oil, thereby displacing it more efficiently than an immiscible gas flood. Some successful high pressure air injection (HPAI) projects have been reported in low permeability and low porosity light oil reservoirs. Spontaneous oil ignition was reported in some of these projects, at least from laboratory experiments; however, the mechanism by which the generated flue gas displaces the oil has not been discussed in clear terms in the literature. An experimental investigation was carried out to study the mechanism by which flue gases displace light oil at a reservoir temperature of 116°C and typical reservoir pressures ranging from 27.63 MPa to 46.06 MPa. The results showed that the flue gases displaced the oil in a forward contacting process resembling a combined vaporizing and condensing multi-contact gas drive mechanism. The flue gases also became near-miscible with the oil at elevated pressures, an indication that high pressure flue gas (or air) injection is a cost-effective process for enhanced recovery of light oils, compared to rich gas or water injection, with the potential of sequestering carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas.


SPE Journal ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-17
Author(s):  
Saira ◽  
Emmanuel Ajoma ◽  
Furqan Le-Hussain

Summary Carbon dioxide (CO2) enhanced oil recovery is the most economical technique for carbon capture, usage, and storage. In depleted reservoirs, full or near-miscibility of injected CO2 with oil is difficult to achieve, and immiscible CO2 injection leaves a large volume of oil behind and limits available pore volume (PV) for storing CO2. In this paper, we present an experimental study to delineate the effect of ethanol-treated CO2 injection on oil recovery, net CO2 stored, and amount of ethanol left in the reservoir. We inject CO2 and ethanol-treated CO2 into Bentheimer Sandstone cores representing reservoirs. The oil phase consists of a mixture of 0.65 hexane and 0.35 decane (C6-C10 mixture) by molar fraction in one set of experimental runs, and pure decane (C10) in the other set of experimental runs. All experimental runs are conducted at constant temperature 70°C and various pressures to exhibit immiscibility (9.0 MPa for the C6-C10 mixture and 9.6 MPa for pure C10) or near-miscibility (11.7 MPa for the C6-C10 mixture and 12.1 MPa for pure C10). Pressure differences across the core, oil recovery, and compositions and rates of the produced fluids are recorded during the experimental runs. Ultimate oil recovery under immiscibility is found to be 9 to 15% greater using ethanol-treated CO2 injection than that using pure CO2 injection. Net CO2 stored for pure C10 under immiscibility is found to be 0.134 PV greater during ethanol-treated CO2 injection than during pure CO2 injection. For the C6-C10 mixture under immiscibility, both ethanol-treated CO2 injection and CO2 injection yield the same net CO2 stored. However, for the C6-C10 mixture under near-miscibility,ethanol-treated CO2 injection is found to yield 0.161 PV less net CO2 stored than does pure CO2 injection. These results suggest potential improvement in oil recovery and net CO2 stored using ethanol-treated CO2 injection instead of pure CO2 injection. If economically viable, ethanol-treated CO2 injection could be used as a carbon capture, usage, and storage method in low-pressure reservoirs, for which pure CO2 injection would be infeasible.


2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 14
Author(s):  
H. Karimaie ◽  
O. Torsæter

The purpose of the three experiments described in this paper is to investigate the efficiency of secondary andtertiary gas injection in fractured carbonate reservoirs, focusing on the effect of equilibrium gas,re-pressurization and non-equilibrium gas. A weakly water-wet sample from Asmari limestone which is the mainoil producing formation in Iran, was placed vertically in a specially designed core holder surrounded withfracture. The unique feature of the apparatus used in the experiment, is the capability of initializing the samplewith live oil to obtain a homogeneous saturation and create the fracture around it by using a special alloy whichis easily meltable. After initializing the sample, the alloy can be drained from the bottom of the modified coreholder and create the fracture which is filled with live oil and surrounded the sample. Pressure and temperaturewere selected in the experiments to give proper interfacial tensions which have been measured experimentally.Series of secondary and tertiary gas injection were carried out using equilibrium and non-equilibrium gas.Experiments have been performed at different pressures and effect of reduction of interfacial tension werechecked by re-pressurization process. The experiments showed little oil recovery due to water injection whilesignificant amount of oil has been produced due to equilibrium gas injection and re-pressurization. Results alsoreveal that CO2 injection is a very efficient recovery method while injection of C1 can also improve the oilrecovery.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document