How Powerful Material Balance Analysis Method for Predicting Gas Flooding Performance

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. R. Sutoyo ◽  
T. Ariadji ◽  
P. A. Aziz ◽  
M. L. Mahendra
2017 ◽  
Vol 42 (29) ◽  
pp. 18718-18727 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuwei Jiao ◽  
Jing Xia ◽  
Pengcheng Liu ◽  
Jing Zhang ◽  
Baozhu Li ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Azis Hidayat ◽  
Dwi Hudya Febrianto ◽  
Elisa Wijayanti ◽  
Diniko Nurhajj ◽  
Ahmad Sujai ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bashirul Haq

Abstract Sour gas reservoirs are vital sources for natural gas production. Sulphur deposition in the reservoir reduces a considerable amount of gas production due to permeability reduction. Consequently, well health monitoring and early prediction of Sulphur deposition are crucial for effective gas production from a sour gas reservoir. Dynamic gas material balance analysis is a useful technique in calculating gas initially in place utilizing the flowing wellhead or bottom hole pressures and rates during the well's lifetime. The approach did not apply to monitor a producing gas's health well and detect Sulphur deposition. This work aims to (i) modify dynamic gas material balance equation by adding the Sulphur deposition term, (ii) build a model to predict and validate the issue utilizing the modified equation. A unique form of the flowing material balance is developed by including Sulphur residue term. The curve fitting tool and modified flowing gas material balance are applied to predict well-expected behaviour. The variation between expected and actual performance indicates the health issue of a well. Initial, individual components of the model are tested. Then the model is validated with the known values. The workflow is applied to active gas field and correctly detected the health issue. The novel workflow can accurately predict Sulphur evidence. Besides,the workflow can notify the production engineers to take corrective measures about the subject. Keywords: Sulfur deposition, Dynamic gas material balance analysis, Workflow


2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thang Bui ◽  
Malvinder S. Bandal ◽  
Nurhidayah Hutamin ◽  
Allyson Gajraj

Geofluids ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-15
Author(s):  
Shijun Huang ◽  
Jiaojiao Zhang ◽  
Sidong Fang ◽  
Xifeng Wang

In shale gas reservoirs, the production data analysis method is widely used to invert reservoir and fracture parameter, and productivity prediction. Compared with numerical models and semianalytical models, which have high computational cost, the analytical model is mostly used in the production data analysis method to characterize the complex fracture network formed after fracturing. However, most of the current calculation models ignore the uneven support of fractures, and most of them use a single supported fracture model to describe the flow characteristics, which magnifies the role of supported fracture to a certain extent. Therefore, in this study, firstly, the fractures are divided into supported fractures and unsupported fractures. According to the near-well supported fractures and far-well unsupported fractures, the SRV zone is divided into outer SRV and inner SRV. The four areas are characterized by different seepage models, and the analytical solutions of the models are obtained by Laplace transform and inverse transform. Secondly, the material balance pseudotime is introduced to process the production data under the conditions of variable production and variable pressure. The double logarithmic curves of normalized production rate, rate integration, the derivative of the integration, and material balance pseudotime are established, and the parameters are interpreted by fitting the theoretical curve to the measured data. Then, the accuracy of the method is verified by comparison the parameter interpretation results with well test results, and the influence of parameters such as the half-length and permeability of supported and unsupported fractures on gas production is analyzed. Finally, the proposed method is applied to four field cases in southwest China. This paper mainly establishes an analytical method for parameter interpretation after hydraulic fracturing based on the production data analysis method considering the uneven support of fractures, which is of great significance for understanding the mechanism of fracturing stimulation, optimization of fracturing parameters, and gas production forecast.


1994 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. L. West ◽  
P. J. R. Cochrane

Tight shallow gas reservoirs in the Western Canada Basin present a number of unique challenges in accurately determining reserves. Traditional methods such as decline analysis and material balance are inaccurate due to the formations' low permeabilities and poor pressure data. The low permeabilities cause long transient periods not easily separable from production decline using conventional decline analysis. The result is lower confidence in selecting the appropriate decline characteristics (exponential or harmonic) which significantly impacts recovery factors and remaining reserves. Limited, poor quality pressure data and commingled production from the three producing zones results in non representative pressure data and hence inaccurate material balance analysis. This paper presents the merit of two new methods of reserve evaluation which address the problems described above for tight shallow gas in the Medicine Hat field. The first method applies type curve matching which combines the analytical pressure solutions of the diffusivity equation (transient) with the empirical decline equation. The second method is an extended material balance which incorporates the gas deliverability theory to allow the selection of appropriate p/z derivatives without relying on pressure data. Excellent results were obtained by applying these two methodologies to ten properties which gather gas from 2300 wells. The two independent techniques resulted in similar production forecasts and reserves, confirming their validity. They proved to be valuable, practical tools in overcoming the various challenges of tight shallow gas and in improving the accuracy in gas reserves determination in the Medicine Hat field.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ralph G McNeil ◽  
Aleksandr Antonov ◽  
S. Hamed Tabatabaie ◽  
Louis Mattar

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document