Reactive Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage Oil Sands Recovery Process

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Z. Khansari ◽  
I. Gates
Keyword(s):  
Oil Sands ◽  
Recovery Process ◽  
Gravity Drainage ◽  
Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage

Approximate Physics-Discrete Simulation of the Steam-Chamber Evolution in Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage

SPE Journal ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (02) ◽  
pp. 477-491 ◽  
Author(s):  
Enrique Gallardo ◽  
Clayton V. Deutsch
Keyword(s):  
Oil Sands ◽  
Recovery Process ◽  
Thermal Recovery ◽  
Porous Media Flow ◽  
Gravity Drainage ◽  
Discrete Simulation ◽  
Flow Equations ◽  
Integrity Assessment ◽  
Steam Chamber ◽  
Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage

Summary Steam-assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) is a thermal-recovery process to produce bitumen from oil sands. In this technology, steam injected in the reservoir creates a constantly evolving steam chamber while heated bitumen drains to a production well. Understanding the geometry and the rate of growth of the steam chamber is necessary to manage an economically successful SAGD project. This work introduces an approximate physics-discrete simulator (APDS) to model the steam-chamber evolution. The algorithm is formulated and implemented using graph theory, simplified porous-media flow equations, heat-transfer concepts, and ideas from discrete simulation. The APDS predicts the steam-chamber evolution in heterogeneous reservoirs and is computationally efficient enough to be applied over multiple geostatistical realizations to support decisions in the presence of geological uncertainty. The APDS is expected to be useful for selecting well-pair locations and operational strategies, 4D-seismic integration in SAGD-reservoir characterization, and caprock-integrity assessment.

scholarly journals Identifying Reservoir Features via iSOR Response Behaviour

Energies ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 427
Author(s):  
Jingyi Wang ◽  
Ian Gates
Keyword(s):  
Oil Sands ◽  
Gravity Drainage ◽  
Athabasca Oil Sands ◽  
Steam Chamber ◽  
Heterogeneous Reservoirs ◽  
Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage ◽  
Response Behaviour

To extract viscous bitumen from oil sands reservoirs, steam is injected into the formation to lower the bitumen’s viscosity enabling sufficient mobility for its production to the surface. Steam-assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) is the preferred process for Athabasca oil sands reservoirs but its performance suffers in heterogeneous reservoirs leading to an elevated steam-to-oil ratio (SOR) above that which would be observed in a clean oil sands reservoir. This implies that the SOR could be used as a signature to understand the nature of heterogeneities or other features in reservoirs. In the research reported here, the use of the SOR as a signal to provide information on the heterogeneity of the reservoir is explored. The analysis conducted on prototypical reservoirs reveals that the instantaneous SOR (iSOR) can be used to identify reservoir features. The results show that the iSOR profile exhibits specific signatures that can be used to identify when the steam chamber reaches the top of the formation, a lean zone, a top gas zone, and shale layers.

A Basis for Automated Control of Steam Trap Subcool in SAGD

SPE Journal ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 17 (03) ◽  
pp. 680-686 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dharmeshkumar R. Gotawala ◽  
Ian D. Gates
Keyword(s):  
Temperature Difference ◽  
Oil Sands ◽  
Dynamic Control ◽  
Recovery Process ◽  
Steam Injection ◽  
Liquid Pool ◽  
Gravity Drainage ◽  
Approximate Theory ◽  
Smart Wells ◽  
The Difference

Summary Full steam conformance along the well pair of the steam-assisted gravity-drainage (SAGD) oil-sands-recovery process is essential for high thermal efficiency. Conformance can be improved by controlling injection and production strategies to ensure that steam is delivered to target regions in the reservoir. Smart wells use interval-control valves (ICVs) that, conceptually, can be dynamically controlled to yield uniform steam injectivity along the well pair. Dynamic control algorithms, such as proportional-integral-derivative (PID) control and their associated controller parameters, have not yet been developed for the SAGD processes that use ICVs. One control strategy would be to control the interwell subcool temperature difference—that is, the difference between the steam-injection temperature and the produced-fluids temperature. If this temperature difference is small, then the liquid pool above the production well is small and there is a likelihood of live steam production from the chamber. On the other hand, if the difference is large, the pool may rise above the injection well and gravity drainage is hindered because the chamber is largely filled with liquid. Here, the focus is on developing a simple, approximate theory for the behavior of the liquid pool at the base of the steam chamber to determine the ranges of values of control parameters to achieve a targeted interwell subcool temperature difference.

Numerical Simulation of Thermal Solvent Replacing Steam under Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage SAGD Process

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Weiqiang Li ◽  
Daulat D. Mamora
Keyword(s):  
High Temperature ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Oil Sands ◽  
Steam Injection ◽  
Thermal Recovery ◽  
Production Performance ◽  
Gravity Drainage ◽  
Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage ◽  
Recovery Technique ◽  
Simulation Results

Abstract Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD) is one successful thermal recovery technique applied in the Athabasca oil sands in Canada to produce the very viscous bitumen. Water for SAGD is limited in supply and expensive to treat and to generate steam. Consequently, we conducted a study into injecting high-temperature solvent instead of steam to recover Athabasca oil. In this study, hexane (C6) coinjection at condensing condition is simulated using CMG STARS to analyze the drainage mechanism inside the vapor-solvent chamber. The production performance is compared with an equivalent steam injection case based on the same Athabasca reservoir condition. Simulation results show that C6 is vaporized and transported into the vapor-solvent chamber. At the condensing condition, high temperature C6 reduces the viscosity of the bitumen more efficiently than steam and can displace out all the original oil. The oil production rate with C6 injection is about 1.5 to 2 times that of steam injection with oil recovery factor of about 100% oil initially-in-place. Most of the injected C6 can be recycled from the reservoir and from the produced oil, thus significantly reduce the solvent cost. Results of our study indicate that high-temperature solvent injection appears feasible although further technical and economic evaluation of the process is required.

Evaluation of Induced Thermal Pressurization in Clearwater Shale Caprock in Electromagnetic Steam-Assisted Gravity-Drainage Projects

SPE Journal ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 19 (03) ◽  
pp. 443-462 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sahar Ghannadi ◽  
Mazda Irani ◽  
Rick Chalaturnyk
Keyword(s):  
Pore Pressure ◽  
Analytical Solutions ◽  
Oil Sands ◽  
Shear Failure ◽  
Gravity Drainage ◽  
Hydraulic Fractures ◽  
Low Permeability ◽  
Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage ◽  
Thermal Pressurization ◽  
Shale Formation

Summary Inductive methods, such as electromagnetic steam-assisted gravity drainage (EM-SAGD), have been identified as technically and economically feasible recovery methods for shallow oil-sands reservoirs with overburdens of more than 30 m (Koolman et al. 2008). However, in EM-SAGD projects, the caprock overlying oil-sands reservoirs is also electromagnetically heated along with the bitumen reservoir. Because permeability is low in Alberta thermal-project caprock formations (i.e., the Clearwater shale formation in the Athabasca deposit and the Colorado shale formation in the Cold Lake deposit), the pore pressure resulting from the thermal expansion of pore fluids may not be balanced with the fluid loss caused by flow and the fluid-volume changes resulting from pore dilation. In extreme cases, the water boils, and the pore pressure increases dramatically as a result of the phase change in the water, which causes profound effective-stress reduction. After this condition is established, pore pressure increases can lead to shear failure of the caprock, the creation of microcracks and hydraulic fractures, and subsequent caprock integrity failure. It is typically believed that low-permeability caprocks impede the transmission of pore pressure from the reservoir, making them more resistant to shear failure (Collins 2005, 2007). In cases of induced thermal pressurization, low-permeability caprocks are not always more resistant. In this study, analytical solutions are obtained for temperature and pore-pressure rises caused by the constant EM heating rate of the caprock. These analytical solutions show that pore-pressure increases from EM heating depend on the permeability and compressibility of the caprock formation. For stiff or low-compressibility media, thermal pressurization can cause fluid pressures to approach hydrostatic pressure, and shear strength to approach zero for low-cohesive-strength units of the caprock (units of the caprock with high silt and sand percentage) and sections of the caprock with pre-existing fractures with no cohesion.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document