Resolving the Mixed Salinity Challenges with a Methodology Developed from Pulsed Neutron Capture Gamma Ray Spectral Measurements

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shouxiang Mark Ma ◽  
Harold Pfutzner ◽  
Adbalrasool Abdallah Al Hajari ◽  
Nedal Mohamed Al-musharfi ◽  
Pablo Jose Saldungaray ◽  
...  
1995 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.E. Plasek ◽  
R.A. Adolph ◽  
C. Stoller ◽  
D.J. Willis ◽  
E.E. Bordon ◽  
...  

Desalination ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 75 ◽  
pp. 199-210 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samir Abdul-Majid ◽  
Uthman Dawood
Keyword(s):  

Geophysics ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 84 (1) ◽  
pp. D39-D56 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mathilde Luycx ◽  
Carlos Torres-Verdín

Radioactive chemical sources can pose security, health, and environmental risks when used to estimate rock porosity in situ. The oil industry has been developing solutions to eliminate radioactive chemical sources in borehole nuclear logging. Pulsed neutron generators have successfully replaced chemical sources in neutron tools, but cesium-137 is still mainly used for borehole density measurements. Neutron-activated gamma-ray measurements (neutron-gamma) are a possible alternative to radioactive chemical sources in density tools. Despite recent advances, the measurement faces challenges regarding density accuracy across diverse solid and fluid rock compositions and nonnegligible sensitivity to borehole environmental effects. We have examined a theoretical, albeit realistic, logging-while-drilling neutron-gamma density (NGD) tool operating with two inelastic gamma-ray detectors and two fast neutron detectors. With a strong emphasis on measurement physics and source-sensor design, the tool delivers density accuracies comparable to those of gamma-gamma density (GGD) tools with [Formula: see text] error in shale-free formations and [Formula: see text] in shale and shaly formations. Our work also compares NGD with GGD in terms of depth of investigation (DOI), vertical resolution, and sensitivity to borehole environmental effects to determine optimal logging conditions. NGD accuracy is limited in the presence of standoff. With inputs of caliper and mud type, empirical density corrections can be applied up to 0.64 cm (0.25 in) standoff. NGD also has limited applicability in thinly bedded formations with maximum vertical resolution of 76 cm (2.5 ft). However, the measurement outperforms GGD in the presence of invasion because its DOI is twice as large.


1982 ◽  
Vol 71 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 47-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. L. Anderson ◽  
J. M. Phelan ◽  
T. Vossler ◽  
W. H. Zoller

1983 ◽  
Vol 16 (11) ◽  
pp. 2061-2074 ◽  
Author(s):  
A M Hassan ◽  
E Gantner ◽  
E Mainka ◽  
H Ruf ◽  
U Kuhnes ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document