Investigation of Gas/Oil Relative Permeabilities: High-Permeability Oil Reservoir Application

Author(s):  
J. Delclaud ◽  
J. Rochon ◽  
A. Nectoux
2016 ◽  
Vol 223 ◽  
pp. 1185-1191 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamad Mohamadi-Baghmolaei ◽  
Reza Azin ◽  
Zahra Sakhaei ◽  
Rezvan Mohamadi-Baghmolaei ◽  
Shahriar Osfouri

2012 ◽  
Vol 524-527 ◽  
pp. 1615-1619
Author(s):  
Heng Song ◽  
Lun Zhao ◽  
Jian Xin Li ◽  
Kou Shi

The development of gas-oil reservoir with condensate gas is more difficult than pure gas reservoir or oil reservoir. This article gives the example of G oil reservoir the development of gas cap and oil rim. According to the characteristic of the oil developing and the results of numerical simulation, the rules for oil and gas developing and developing time have been defined, by which the recoveries of gas, oil, and condensate oil will reach a significantly high level.


1979 ◽  
Vol 19 (01) ◽  
pp. 15-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
P.M. Sigmund ◽  
F.G. McCaffery

Abstract With typical heterogeneous carbonate coresamples, large uncertainties of unknown magnitudecan occur in the relative permeabilities derived using different methods. This situation can beimproved by analyzing the recovery and pressureresponse to two-phase laboratory displacement tests by a nonlinear least-squares procedure. Thesuggested technique fits the finite-differencesolution of the Buckley-Leverett two-phase flowequations(which include capillary pressure) to theobserved recovery and pressure data. The procedureis used to determine relative-permeability curves characterized by two parameters and their standarderrors for heterogeneous cores from two Albertacarbonate reservoirs. Introduction Several recent investigations have recognizedpossible problems when obtaining reliable two-phasedisplacement data from heterogeneous carbonate core samples. Huppler stated that waterfloodresults on cores with significant heterogeneitiescan be sensitive to flooding rate, core length, andwettability, and that these effects should beconsidered before applying the laboratory results atfield flooding rates. Brandner and Slotboomsuggested that realistic displacement results maynot be obtainable when vertically flooding aheterogeneous core with a nonwetting phase becauseof the fluid's inability to maintain a properdistribution when the sample length is less than the height of capillary rise. Ehrlich noted thatstandard relative-permeability measurement methodsusing core plugs cannot be applied when the media are heterogeneous. Archer and Wong reported that application of theconventional Johnson- Bossler - Neumann (JBN)methods for determining relative permeabilities froma waterflood test could give erroneous results forheterogeneous carbonate as well as for relativelyhomogeneous porous media having a mixed wettability (see Refs. 1, 6, and 7). The observedstepwise or humped shape of water relativepermeability curves mainly were attributed to theeffect of water breakthrough ahead of the main floodfront entering into the JBN calculation. Archer andWong suggested that such abnormally shapedrelative-permeability curves do not represent theproperties of the bulk of the core sample, and proposed the use of a reservoir simulator forinterpreting laboratory waterflood data. The work referred to above provides the majorbackground for this study involving the developmentof an improved unsteady-state test method tocharacterize the relative-permeability properties ofheterogeneous carbonate core samples. The methodcan be applied to all porous media, regardless ofthe size and distribution of the heterogeneities.However, the presence of large-scaleheterogeneities, especially in the form of vugs, fractures, and stratification, could cause the derivedrelative-permeability relations to be affected by viscosityratio and displacement rate. Remember also that extrapolation of any core test data to a field scaleis associated with many uncertainties, particularlyfor heterogeneous formations. The inclusion ofcapillary pressure effects permits the interpretationof displacement tests at reservoir rates. The proposed calculation procedure extends theapproach suggested by Archer and Wong in thatthe degree of fit between observed laboratory dataand simulator results is quantified. We suggest thatrelative-permeability curves for a variety of rocktypes can be expressed in terms of two adjustable parameters and their standard error estimates.To illustrate the method, the results of displacementtests performed on cores from Swan Hills Beaverhill Lake limestone oil reservoir and Rainbow F KegRiver dolomite oil reservoir are interpreted. SPEJ P. 15^


1993 ◽  
Vol 1 (02) ◽  
pp. 114-122 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.M. Narahara ◽  
A.L. Pozzi ◽  
T.H. Blackshear

1993 ◽  
Vol 8 (02) ◽  
pp. 143-150 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.E. Dria ◽  
G.A. Pope ◽  
Kamy Sepehrnoori

Author(s):  
Meihong Wang ◽  
Qingqiang Wu

Identification of gas-oil reservoir is always important but rather difficult in global gas-oil exploration. It is of the great significance to improve the accuracy of reservoir recognition. Seismic exploration is one of the most valuable methods of gas-oil exploration, and the huge amounts of seismic attribute data can be useful for gas-oil exploration. One limitation of the Generative Topographic Mapping (GTM) algorithm is that it cannot determine the classifications of the data points with close probabilities accurately, and it would be more likely to result in confused clarification and fuzzy boundary. To overcome the limitation, an advanced GTM algorithm with Euclidean Distance (GTM-ED) is proposed in this paper, and we use Euclidean Distance to compute the distance from the edge points to the neighbor centroids, and classify it to the closet class to avoid the problems of confused classification. And then the GTM-ED algorithm is used in the research of reservoir identification model, experiments are made with actual seismic data set. First of all, the GTM algorithm is discussed, and then the GTM-ED algorithm is introduced. And afterwards, many experiments are made. In the experiments, the log data and geological data are selected as the labels, and the comparison and analysis are made through three aspects, including relative criteria, absolute criteria, and run-time, and then the results of each model are visualized. The experimental results indicate that the GTM-ED can achieve better results in reservoir clustering and unknown reservoir identification. And in the actual application, the visualization of the GTM-ED can behave better than the GTM in showing the geological characteristics of paleochannel, the string of beads-like reservoirs and linear lava.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document