Implications of U.S. and Europe Shale Gas on the Nigerian Gas Market

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.A. Oyekunle
Keyword(s):  
2013 ◽  
Vol 53 (2) ◽  
pp. 476
Author(s):  
David Warner

Australia could have shale gas resources several times bigger than the existing conventional gas resource base, which is estimated at about 5,300 BCM (190 TCF) by Geoscience Australia (GA). The Australian Government has no estimate of potential shale gas resources. The US Department of Energy (EIA) in 2011 estimated Australian shale gas resources to be 400 TCF. The quantity of this estimate is supported by an Australian study—which estimates resources of 600 TCF—conducted by Advanced Well Technologies (AWT) in conjunction with DSWPET. While there are significant technical differences between the shale gas plays in the US and Australia, it is too early to tell if the technical differences are barriers. There are also significant differences in the commercial landscape. The lack of capacity in Australia has lead to much higher costs for drilling and fracture stimulation than in the US. The size of the domestic gas market is much greater in the US and its existing infrastructure allows for production to come onstream quickly. In Australia this infrastructure is not present in most areas and the domestic market cannot support another large gas development. Perhaps the greatest challenge to this great opportunity is politics. There is a public, hence political,perception that all gas sources have the same gasland problems. These perceptions can be changed. First, the petroleum industry and governments need to understand the potential size of the gas resource and the possible strategic opportunity for Australia. Also these parties need to recognise that the shale gas resources are often located away from areas of high social and environmental impact. Once these factors are understood by these parties, factual information about the environmental impact of shale gas plays in comparison with coal seam methane and other alternative gas supplies can be factored into gas resource planning.


Energy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 215 ◽  
pp. 119101
Author(s):  
Haijun Yang ◽  
Xin Han ◽  
Li Wang
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 236-250
Author(s):  
S. S. Zhiltsov ◽  
I. S. Zonn

This chapter considers the approaches and possibilities of exploration and use of shale gas in the countries of the former USSR. Many of them became interested in the results of the US “shale revolution” which opened the new stage in gas production. Some post-Soviet countries are eager by using shale gas to reduce their dependence on external deliveries, thus, attaining energy independence.The data on shale gas reserves in the post-Soviet countries are taken together; the preliminary results of energy policy in these countries concerning development of the shale gas deposits are presented; the first results of oil and gas company activities are analyzed.Of all post-Soviet countries, Ukraine was most active in this respect having declared about possessing the greatest shale gas reserves. Ukraine invited foreign oil and gas companies which showed interest in the shale deposits. But the shale gas production in Ukraine acquired political dimensions impeding the objective assessment of startup conditions and likely consequences of shale gas extraction for the people and natural environment. Shale gas was in the focus of attention of the authorities in Kazakhstan and Moldavia which considered this hydrocarbon resource as the significant factor for diversification of hydrocarbon supply and ensuring independence of the Russian gas. “Shale revolution” was not neglected in Russia which had to take into account the shale gas factor in the world energy balance adjusting its policy respectively. USA made attempt to push its shale contracts in Russia, thus, ensuring access to the Russian gas market. On the one hand, Russia remained indifferent to the shale boom and went on implementation of its pipeline projects, but, on the other hand, it does not waive off absolutely the potential of this hydrocarbon resource.In general, the post-Soviet countries regardless of the lack of a legislative base, technologies and unresolved environmental issues have shown certain interest in shale gas production. 


2013 ◽  
Vol 53 (2) ◽  
pp. 499
Author(s):  
Lisa Henneberry ◽  
Steven Harris ◽  
Anthony Way

This extended abstract analyses the combined disruptive effects of the shale gas boom, the global gas glut, and the worldwide economic crisis on international gas markets. These factors are considered in three major regions of the world: In the competitive and liquid US gas market, increased domestic shale gas production prompted a dramatic decline in US gas prices and ultimately eliminated virtually all demand for new supplies of imported LNG. In Europe, continuing liberalisation in the EU's natural gas end-user and wholesale markets, the growing liquidity of trading hubs across Europe, and the introduction of cheaper spot-gas have fundamentally changed the traditional oil-indexed gas and LNG contracting models. In Asia, changes in buyer sensitivities to supply security and the development of new sources of supply have prompted discounting against traditional oil-based benchmarks and an increase in short-term or more flexible LNG purchases. This extended abstract explores the combined effects of these developing trends in each major region together with the typical responses of buyers and sellers in each market. These effects and reactions introduce associated complexities in this changing-price environment. The authors also explore potential changes in the traditional gas and LNG contracting model and the evolution of related risk allocations, which contracting parties often rely on.


2014 ◽  
Vol 54 (2) ◽  
pp. 511
Author(s):  
Lizzie Knight ◽  
Louise Bell

In Australia the shale gas debate has been polarised between those extolling its virtues with unchecked enthusiasm on one side and deep wariness on the other. How can we re-imagine Australia’s energy future and what is the proper place for shale gas? With 396 trillion cubic feet of potential shale gas reserves (CSIRO, 2012), Australia stands on a precipice of a golden age of gas, but only if those reserves can be developed profitably and with a higher level of community support and understanding. The development of a shale gas industry is likely to transform the nation’s domestic gas and export LNG markets, increase energy security, and bolster the Australian economy. Community concern and infrastructure constraints, however, stand as barriers to the realisation of the industry. The US is one of the few countries to have developed shale gas to a commercial scale. Facilitative government policies, extensive infrastructure networks, open-access policies, a favourable regulatory framework, a highly competitive industry, and a strong R&D focus have allowed the shale gas industry to flourish. Meanwhile, the nascent Australian unconventional gas industry grapples with community support, regulatory duplication and delays, conflicts about competing resources, productivity decline, and rising capital and labour costs. The development of major CSG to LNG export projects in Queensland will promote competition for gas between domestic and international customers. The eastern Australia domestic gas market will no longer be insulated from the world gas market and the domestic gas price is likely to rise to meet international prices. A shale gas industry in Australia could provide part of the solution to future domestic gas shortages and price hikes. To develop an Australian shale gas industry, however, proponents will require a social licence to operate and access to infrastructure. Government and industry need to act now to implement a coordinated strategy that will enable proponents to secure and maintain their social licence and obtain adequate access to infrastructure. While the existing Australian unconventional gas industry and overseas shale gas experiences are defined by a specific set of circumstances and differ from the Australian shale gas experience in a number of important respects, lessons from shale gas projects abroad is paramount to shaping a mature debate and ensuring this potential opportunity is realised.


2018 ◽  
Vol 930 ◽  
pp. 37-42
Author(s):  
Vitor Polezi Pesce de Campos ◽  
Gisele Aparecida Amaral Labat ◽  
Douglas Gouvea ◽  
Guilherme Frederico Bernardo Lenz e Silva

Unconventional shale gas reservoirs have driven the growth of the oil and gas market to a new reality: till 2035 a 26% increase in US fuel production is predicted. Thus, the hydraulic fracturing technique has been increasingly used as a resource for shale gas extraction and the consequent use of proppants. Several studies have now evaluated the use of nanostructures to produce special proppants, such as nanosensors, coatings, membranes and special fluids. This work presents the perspective of the market for oil, gas, shale, hydraulic fracturing and proppants in addition to a current development of proppants. Proppants were characterized through API RP 19C, DTA and DRX analysis. The morphology of carbon nanostructures (carbon nanotubes, carbon black and few layers’ graphite from reduced graphene oxide synthesis) produced and introduced on AM (alkali-activated metakaolin) matrix composites were evaluated using scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM).


Subject Canada’s LNG outlook. Significance Canada hopes to join the ranks of the world’s major liquefied natural gas (LNG) exporters. The industry could draw tens of billions of dollars in investment and help Canada send more of its natural resources to Asia’s energy-hungry markets, a key foreign policy goal for Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s government. However, those hopes have taken a hit as rival US LNG projects race ahead and the global gas market goes through a supply glut. Impacts As the market dims British Columbia’s LNG hopes, it will take some of the urgency out of what has been a divisive local political issue. Without an LNG export option, Canada’s emerging shale gas industry would see drilling activity slow on continued low prices. US efforts to squeeze lumber imports from Canada will weigh on British Columbia’s economy as well as energy export development delays.


2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 203-213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sauleh Siddiqui ◽  
Steven A. Gabriel
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document