Coiled Tubing Best Practices in Conjunction with Multistage Completions in the Tight Gas Fields of Saudi Arabia

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Al-Ghazal ◽  
Justin Tate Abel ◽  
Muhammad Al-Buali ◽  
Azmi Al-Ruwaished ◽  
Abdulaziz Al-Saqr ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Saudi Arabia ◽  
Best Practices ◽  
Tight Gas ◽  
Coiled Tubing ◽  
Gas Fields

Coiled Tubing Operational Guidelines in Conjunction with Multistage Fracturing Completions in the Tight Gas Fields of Saudi Arabia

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammed Al Gazal ◽  
Justin Tate Abel ◽  
Stuart Wilson ◽  
Henry Wortmann ◽  
Bryan Bruce Johnston
Keyword(s):  
Saudi Arabia ◽  
Tight Gas ◽  
Coiled Tubing ◽  
Gas Fields

Assessment of Multistage Fracturing Technologies as Deployed in the Tight Gas Fields of Saudi Arabia

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammed Al-Ghazal ◽  
Saad Al-Driweesh ◽  
Fadel Al-Ghurairi ◽  
Abdulaziz Al-Sagr ◽  
Mustafa Al-Zaid
Keyword(s):  
Saudi Arabia ◽  
Tight Gas ◽  
Gas Fields

Assessment of Multistage Fracturing Technologies as Deployed in the Tight Gas Fields of Saudi Arabia

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammed Al-Ghazal ◽  
Saad Al-Driweesh ◽  
Fadel Al-Ghurairi ◽  
Abdulaziz Al-Sagr ◽  
Mustafa Al-Zaid
Keyword(s):  
Saudi Arabia ◽  
Tight Gas ◽  
Gas Fields

Milestones, Lessons Learned and Best Practices in the Designing, Deployment and Installation of ICDs in Saudi Arabia

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammed A Madan ◽  
Kousha Gohari ◽  
Roberto Vicario ◽  
Heikki A Jutila ◽  
Hesham A Mohammed
Keyword(s):  
Saudi Arabia ◽  
Best Practices ◽  
Lessons Learned

The Effects of Fluid Hammer Tools on the Efficiencies of Coiled Tubing Plug Milling - A Comparative Best Practices Study

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher E. Schneider ◽  
Steven Henry Craig ◽  
Juan Carlos Castaneda ◽  
Luis Castro
Keyword(s):  
Best Practices ◽  
Coiled Tubing

Case Study- Real Time Downhole Telemetry CCL and Tension Compression, a Differentiator for Successful Manipulation of ICD's in Horizontal Wells

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Usman Ahmed ◽  
Zhiheng Zhang ◽  
Ruben Ortega Alfonzo
Keyword(s):  
Saudi Arabia ◽  
Real Time ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Horizontal Wells ◽  
Differential Pressure ◽  
Successful Operation ◽  
Coiled Tubing ◽  
Electric Line ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Ict System

Abstract Horizontal well completions are often equipped with Inflow Control Devices (ICDs) to optimize flow rates across the completion for the whole length of the interval and to increase the oil recovery. The ICD technology has become useful method of optimizing production from horizontal wells in a wide range of applications. It has proved to be beneficial in horizontal water injectors and steam assisted gravity drainage wells. Traditionally the challenges related to early gas or water breakthrough were dealt with complex and costly workover/intervention operations. ICD manipulation used to be done with down-hole tractor conveyed using an electric line (e-line) cable or by utilization of a conventional coiled tubing (CT) string. Wellbore profile, high doglegs, tubular ID, drag and buoyancy forces added limitations to the e-line interventions even with the use of tractor. Utilization of conventional CT string supplement the uncertainties during shifting operations by not having the assurance of accurate depth and forces applied downhole. A field in Saudi Arabia is completed with open-hole packer with ICD completion system. The excessive production from the wells resulted in increase of water cut, hence ICD's shifting was required. As operations become more complex due to fact that there was no mean to assure that ICD is shifted as needed, it was imperative to find ways to maximize both assurance and quality performance. In this particular case, several ICD manipulating jobs were conducted in the horizontal wells. A 2-7/8-in intelligent coiled tubing (ICT) system was used to optimize the well intervention performance by providing downhole real-time feedback. The indication for the correct ICD shifting was confirmed by Casing Collar Locator (CCL) and Tension & Compression signatures. This paper will present the ICT system consists of a customized bottom-hole assembly (BHA) that transmits Tension, compression, differential pressure, temperature and casing collar locator data instantaneously to the surface via a nonintrusive tube wire installed inside the coiled tubing. The main advantages of the ICT system in this operation were: monitoring the downhole force on the shifting tool while performing ICD manipulation, differential pressure, and accurately determining depth from the casing collar locator. Based on the known estimated optimum working ranges for ICD shifting and having access to real-time downhole data, the operator could decide that required force was transmitted to BHA. This bring about saving job time while finding sleeves, efficient open and close of ICD via applying required Weight on Bit (WOB) and even providing a mean to identify ICD that had debris accumulation. The experience acquired using this method in the successful operation in Saudi Arabia yielded recommendations for future similar operations.

scholarly journals Maturation of HPHT Tight Gas Fields in North Oman

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qassim Al Riyami ◽  
Andreas P. Briner ◽  
Andreas P. Briner ◽  
Hamood al Habsi ◽  
Edwin Lamers
Keyword(s):  
Tight Gas ◽  
Gas Fields

Understanding Unusual Diagnostic Fracture Injection Test Results in Tight Gas Fields - A Holistic Approach to Resolving the Data

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.N.. N. Naidu ◽  
E.A.. A. Guevara ◽  
A.J.. J. Twynam ◽  
J.. Rueda ◽  
W.. Dawson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hydraulic Fracturing ◽  
Test Procedure ◽  
Holistic Approach ◽  
In Situ Stress ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Petroleum Engineering ◽  
Tight Gas ◽  
Review Team ◽  
Gas Fields ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Hydraulic fracturing is a commonly used completion approach for extracting hydrocarbon resources from formations, particularly in those formations of very low permeability. As part of this process the use of Diagnostic Fracture Injection Tests (DFIT) can provide valuable information. When the measured pressures in such tests are outside the expected range for a given formation, a number of possibilities and questions will arise. Such considerations may include: What caused such inflated pressures? What is the in-situ stress state? Was there a mechanical or operational problem? Was the test procedure or the test equipment at fault? What else can explain the abnormal behaviour? While there may not be simple answers to all of these questions, such an experience can lead to a technically inaccurate conclusion based on inadequate analysis. A recently completed project faced just such a challenge, initially resulting in poor hydraulic fracturing efficiency and a requirement to understand the root causes. In support of this, a thorough analysis involving a multi-disciplinary review team from several technical areas, including petrophysics, rock/geo-mechanics, fluids testing/engineering, completions engineering, hydraulic fracture design and petroleum engineering, was undertaken. This paper describes the evolution of this study, the work performed, the results and conclusions from the analysis. The key factors involved in planning a successful DFIT are highlighted with a general template and a work process for future testing provided. The importance of appreciating the impact of the drilling and completion fluids composition, their properties and their compatibility with the formation fluids are addressed. The overall process and technical approach from this case study in tight gas fields, will have applicability across similar fields and the lessons learned could help unlock those reserves that are initially deemed technically or even commercially unattractive due to abnormal or unexpected behaviour measured during a DFIT operation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document