Optimizing Cased and Perforated Completion Designs Through The Use of API RP-19B Laboratory Testing to Maximize Well Productivity

Author(s):  
Alex D. Procyk ◽  
Robert C. Burton ◽  
David C. Atwood ◽  
Brenden Michael Grove
SPE Journal ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (01) ◽  
pp. 44-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dmitry D. Vodorezov

Summary This paper presents a new numerical model of inflow to a well with a zone of damaged permeability. It is built on the principle of dividing the wellbore and damaged permeability zone into numerous segments. Simultaneous work of the segments is modeled with the method of velocity-potential theory. The model is applicable for wellbores of different trajectories including horizontal and multilateral wells. The model is focused on the extended application of results obtained during laboratory core testing that include a return-permeability (RP) profile of the core and cleanup parameters. The developed solution includes the effects of anisotropy, reservoir-boundary conditions, and a nonuniform distribution of formation damage in both radial and axial directions. The paper presents the new approach to include depth-variable distribution of damage in skin-factor models. The approach provides for the evaluation of pressure drop in a depth-variable damage zone by the resulting permeability that is defined by flow regime. Laboratory-obtained overall core permeability is associated with a linear flow, and when applied to a zone near the wellbore with radial or elliptic flow, it causes an error because of the depth-variable distribution of damage. The provided numerical simulations show that the impact of this factor on horizontal-well productivity is significant. The developed model is compared with existing analytical solutions of Furui et al. (2002) (FZH) and Frick and Economides (1993) (FE) for the case of a horizontal well with a cone-shaped damaged zone. The results show that a skin-factor transformation originally proposed by Renard and Dupuy (1991) for a case of a uniformly damaged well can be used successfully for the referred-to analytical solutions, which makes them applicable for wells with an elliptic drainage area. In this paper, we also suggest an approach whereby we relate the characteristics of the cleanup of the region near the wellbore to laboratory-testing conditions.


2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 3-8
Author(s):  
Seth D. Cohen ◽  
Steven Mandel ◽  
David B. Samadi

Abstract To properly assess men and women with sexual dysfunction, evaluators should take a biopsychosocial approach that may require consultation with multiple health care professionals from various fields in order to get to the root of the sexual dysfunction; this multidisciplinary methodology offers the best chance of successful treatment. For males, this article focuses on erectile dysfunction (ED) and hypogonadism. The initial evaluation of ED involves a thorough case history, preferably taken from the patient and partner, physical examination, and proper laboratory and diagnostic tests, including an acknowledgment of the subjective complaint. The diagnosis is established on the basis of an individual's report of the consistent inability to attain and maintain an erection sufficient to permit satisfactory sexual intercourse. Initial workups for ED should entail a detailed history that can be obtained from a validated questionnaire such as the International Index of Erectile Function and the Sexual Health Inventory for Men. Hypogonadism is evaluated using the validated Androgen Deficiency in the Aging Male questionnaire and laboratory testing for testosterone deficiency. Treatments logically can begin with the least invasive and then progress to more invasive strategies after appropriate counseling. The last and most important treatment component when caring for men with sexual dysfunction—and, arguably, the least practiced—is close follow-up.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document