Double-Layer Expansion: Is It A Primary Mechanism of Improved Oil Recovery by Low-Salinity Waterflooding?

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramez A. Nasralla ◽  
Hisham A. Nasr-El-Din
Keyword(s):  
Double Layer ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Improved Oil Recovery ◽  
Low Salinity ◽  
Primary Mechanism ◽  
Low Salinity Waterflooding

Double-Layer Expansion: Is It a Primary Mechanism of Improved Oil Recovery by Low-Salinity Waterflooding?

2014 ◽  
Vol 17 (01) ◽  
pp. 49-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramez A. Nasralla ◽  
Hisham A. Nasr-El-Din
Keyword(s):  
Double Layer ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
High Salinity ◽  
Improved Oil Recovery ◽  
Low Salinity ◽  
Ph Values ◽  
Low Salinity Water ◽  
Primary Mechanism ◽  
Low Salinity Waterflooding ◽  
Salinity Water

Summary Literature review shows that improved oil recovery (IOR) by low-salinity waterflooding could be attributed to several mechanisms, such as sweep-efficiency improvement, interfacial-tension (IFT) reduction, multicomponent ionic exchange, and electrical-double-layer (EDL) expansion. Although these mechanisms might contribute to IOR by low-salinity water, they may not be the primary mechanism. Therefore, the main objective of this study is to investigate if the mechanism of EDL expansion could be the principal reason for IOR during low-salinity waterflooding. Low-salinity water results in a thicker EDL when compared to high-salinity water, so we tried to eliminate the effect of low-salinity brines on double-layer expansion to show to what extent IOR is related to EDL expansion caused by low-salinity water. The double-layer expansion is dependent on the electric surface charge, which is a function of the pH of brine; therefore, the pH levels of low-salinity brines were decreased in this study to provide low-salinity brines that can produce a thinner EDL, similar to high-salinity brines. ζ-potential measurements were performed on both rock/brine and oil/brine interfaces to demonstrate the effect of brine pH and salinity on EDL. Contact angle and coreflood experiments were conducted to test different brine salinities at different pH values, which could assess the effect of water salinity and pH on rock wettability and oil recovery, and hence involvement of EDL expansion in the IOR process. ζ-potential results in this study showed that decreasing the pH of low-salinity brines makes the electrical charges at both oil/brine and brine/rock interfaces slightly negative, which reduces the double-layer expansion caused by low-salinity brine. As a result, the rock becomes more oil-wet, which was confirmed by contact-angle measurements. Moreover, coreflood experiments indicated that injecting low-salinity brine at lower pH values recovered smaller amounts of oil when compared to the original pH because of the elimination of the low-salinity-water effect on the thickness of the double layer. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that expansion of the double layer is a dominant mechanism of oil-recovery improvement by low-salinity waterflooding.

Continental-shelf freshwater water resources and improved oil recovery by low-salinity waterflooding

AAPG Bulletin ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 101 (01) ◽  
pp. 1-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Person ◽  
John L. Wilson ◽  
Norman Morrow ◽  
Vincent E.A. Post
Keyword(s):  
Water Resources ◽  
Continental Shelf ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Improved Oil Recovery ◽  
Low Salinity ◽  
Low Salinity Waterflooding

Synergy of Polymer for Mobility Control and Surfactant for Interface Elasticity Increase in Improved Oil Recovery

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taniya Kar ◽  
Abbas Firoozabadi
Keyword(s):  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Sea Water ◽  
Synergistic Effects ◽  
Water Injection ◽  
Mobility Control ◽  
Residual Oil ◽  
Sweep Efficiency ◽  
Improved Oil Recovery ◽  
Low Salinity ◽  
Low Salinity Waterflooding

Abstract Improved oil recovery in carbonate rocks through modified injection brine has been investigated extensively in recent years. Examples include low salinity waterflooding and surfactant injection for the purpose of residual oil reduction. Polymer addition to injection water for improvement of sweep efficiency enjoys field success. The effect of low salinity waterflooding is often marginal and it may even decrease recovery compared to seawater flooding. Polymer and surfactant injection are often effective (except at very high salinities and temperatures) but concentrations in the range of 5000 to 10000 ppm may make the processes expensive. We have recently suggested the idea of ultra-low concentration of surfactants at 100 ppm to decrease residual oil saturation from increased brine-oil interfacial elasticity. In this work, we investigate the synergistic effects of polymer injection for sweep efficiency and the surfactant for interfacial elasticity modification. The combined formulation achieves both sweep efficiency and residual oil reduction. A series of coreflood tests is performed on a carbonate rock using three crude oils and various injection brines: seawater and formation water with added surfactant and polymer. Both the surfactant and polymer are found to improve recovery at breakthrough via increase in oil-brine interfacial elasticity and injection brine viscosification, respectively. The synergy of surfactant and polymer mixed with seawater leads to higher viscosity and higher oil recovery. The overall oil recovery is found to be a strong function of oil-brine interfacial viscoelasticity with and without the surfactant and polymer in sea water and connate water injection.

scholarly journals Bulk and Surface Aqueous Speciation of Calcite: Implications for Low-Salinity Waterflooding of Carbonate Reservoirs

SPE Journal ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 23 (01) ◽  
pp. 84-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maxim P. Yutkin ◽  
Himanshu Mishra ◽  
Tadeusz W. Patzek ◽  
John Lee ◽  
Clayton J. Radke
Keyword(s):  
Ionic Strength ◽  
Ion Exchange ◽  
Crude Oil ◽  
Surface Charge ◽  
Double Layer ◽  
Carbonate Reservoir ◽  
Carbonate Reservoirs ◽  
Diffuse Double Layer ◽  
Low Salinity ◽  
Low Salinity Waterflooding

Summary Low-salinity waterflooding (LSW) is ineffective when reservoir rock is strongly water-wet or when crude oil is not asphaltenic. Success of LSW relies heavily on the ability of injected brine to alter surface chemistry of reservoir crude-oil brine/rock (COBR) interfaces. Implementation of LSW in carbonate reservoirs is especially challenging because of high reservoir-brine salinity and, more importantly, because of high reactivity of the rock minerals. Both features complicate understanding of the COBR surface chemistries pertinent to successful LSW. Here, we tackle the complex physicochemical processes in chemically active carbonates flooded with diluted brine that is saturated with atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) and possibly supplemented with additional ionic species, such as sulfates or phosphates. When waterflooding carbonate reservoirs, rock equilibrates with the injected brine over short distances. Injected-brine ion speciation is shifted substantially in the presence of reactive carbonate rock. Our new calculations demonstrate that rock-equilibrated aqueous pH is slightly alkaline quite independent of injected-brine pH. We establish, for the first time, that CO2 content of a carbonate reservoir, originating from CO2-rich crude oil and gas, plays a dominant role in setting aqueous pH and rock-surface speciation. A simple ion-complexing model predicts the calcite-surface charge as a function of composition of reservoir brine. The surface charge of calcite may be positive or negative, depending on speciation of reservoir brine in contact with the calcite. There is no single point of zero charge; all dissolved aqueous species are charge determining. Rock-equilibrated aqueous composition controls the calcite-surface ion-exchange behavior, not the injected-brine composition. At high ionic strength, the electrical double layer collapses and is no longer diffuse. All surface charges are located directly in the inner and outer Helmholtz planes. Our evaluation of calcite bulk and surface equilibria draws several important inferences about the proposed LSW oil-recovery mechanisms. Diffuse double-layer expansion (DLE) is impossible for brine ionic strength greater than 0.1 molar. Because of rapid rock/brine equilibration, the dissolution mechanism for releasing adhered oil is eliminated. Also, fines mobilization and concomitant oil release cannot occur because there are few loose fines and clays in a majority of carbonates. LSW cannot be a low-interfacial-tension alkaline flood because carbonate dissolution exhausts all injected base near the wellbore and lowers pH to that set by the rock and by formation CO2. In spite of diffuse double-layer collapse in carbonate reservoirs, surface ion-exchange oil release remains feasible, but unproved.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document