Well Interventions to Comply with the upgraded Safety Code in a Maturing Field

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marwan Ahmad Qadmani ◽  
Wei Lin
Keyword(s):  
2013 ◽  
Vol 14 (13) ◽  
pp. 1529-1531 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthias Samwald ◽  
Robert R Freimuth
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 110-119
Author(s):  
Young-Joo Song ◽  
Tae-Woo Kim ◽  
Keesin Jeong

The National Fire Safety Code (NFSC) sets forth the installation methods and technical standards of firefighting facilities. This information is stipulated in the attached Table 1 of the Enforcement Decree of the Act on Fire Prevention and Installation, Maintenance and Safety Control of Fire-Fighting Systems. The NFSC serves as a foundation for fire prevention and public safety. However, the current version of the NFSC has been under scrutiny due to its delayed enactment and revision process. This is because of its structural inflexibility, time-consuming procedures, and mixed usage of both performance and technical standards. Furthermore, there are difficulties with keeping its unique specialties due to the absence of a specialized, permanent independent entity that enacts, revises, and maintains its standards. Moreover, the NFSC lacks collectivity, openness, and consistency. Therefore, to overcome the aforementioned obstacles, this study investigates the operational and legal status of the NFSC and the problems regarding its enactment and revision process. Further, it presents suggestions for system improvement by analyzing and comparing the information with domestic and foreign counterparts dedicated to managing their similar technical NFSC standards. First, the study recommends that the legal performance and technical standards mixed within the current NFSC should be separated. Second, the enactment and revision of technical standards should be implemented by the private sector and not by the government. Third, technical standards should adopt a user-oriented approach for the code system.


Author(s):  
Thomas Bress ◽  
Eugenia Kennedy ◽  
Mark Guttag

Abstract In previous work, the hazards associated with elevator door closures were identified and analyzed. Using the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) database of the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), incidents associated with door strikes were identified between the years 1990 to 2017. This current effort focuses on elevator slip, trip and fall hazards. The ASME A17.1 Safety Code for Elevators and Escalators requires that elevator systems be equipped with leveling devices to vertically align the car platform sill relative to the hoistway landing sill to attain a predetermined accuracy. Even with the leveling safety requirements, slip, trip and fall incidents for passengers exiting or entering elevators are known to occur. This paper will analyze elevator slip, trip and fall hazards using injury records from the NEISS database from 1990 to 2019. Relevant elevator incidents were extracted from this dataset through manual inspection of the text-based description fields of all elevator-related incident records found in the NEISS dataset from this time period. National projections of elevator incidents were then calculated from this extracted dataset and trended for the entire time period of 1990 through 2019. The age and sex distributions of these national projections were also analyzed. These projections and trends are then discussed in the context of ASME A17.1 requirements intended to mitigate the risks of injuries when entering or exiting an elevator.


1982 ◽  
Vol 57 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. M. Dean ◽  
H. A. Larson

2009 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Dies ◽  
M. Dapena ◽  
M. Ramon ◽  
R. López ◽  
J. García ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document