Primary Cementing Across Massive Lost Circulation Zones

Author(s):  
W.H. Turki ◽  
A.S. Mackay
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amanmammet Bugrayev ◽  
Svetlana Nafikova ◽  
Salim Taoutaou ◽  
Guvanch Gurbanov ◽  
Maksatmyrat Hanov ◽  
...  

Abstract Lost circulation in depleted sands during a primary cementing job is a serious problem in Turkmenistan. The uncertainty in formation pressure across these sands increases the risk of losses during drilling and cementing, which results in remedial operations and nonproductive time. The need to find a fit-for-purpose lost circulation solution becomes even more critical in an environment with narrow pore pressure-to-fracture gradient, where each cement job with losses compromises the downhole well integrity. An engineered lost circulation solution using innovative materials in the cement slurry was carefully assessed and qualified in the laboratory for each case to optimize the formulation. The lost circulation control treatment combines specialized engineered fibers with sized bridging materials to increase the effectiveness of treatment, formulated and added to the cement slurries based on the slurry solids volume fraction (SVF). Cement slurries with low SVF were treated with higher concentrations of the product and slurries with high SVF used lower concentrations. More than 50 jobs were performed with cement slurries designed at various densities and SVF up to 58% and using this advanced lost circulation material (LCM) to mitigate losses during cementing. Field experience showed positive results, where the differential pressure up to 2,800 psi was expected during cementing operation. A local database, generated based on the design and development work performed, enabled improved decision-making for selection and LCM application requirements for subsequent jobs and development of a lost circulation strategy. The mitigation plan was put in place against losses in critical sections and depleted sand formations in Turkmenistan. It assisted in meeting the cement coverage requirements on numerous occasions, improving overall the integrity of the wells and thus, was considered to be a success. This paper provides insight of this advanced LCM, its application in cement slurries, the logic behind the developed loss circulation strategy, and the high success rate of its implementation. Three case histories are presented to demonstrate the strategy and results.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allam Putra Rachimillah ◽  
Cinto Azwar ◽  
Ambuj Johri ◽  
Ahmed Osman ◽  
Eric Tanoto

Abstract Cementing is one of the sequences in the drilling operations to isolate different geological zones and provide integrity for the life of the well. As compared with oil and gas wells, geothermal wells have unique challenges for cementing operations. Robust cementing design and appropriate best practices during the cementing operations are needed to achieve cementing objectives in geothermal wells. Primary cementing in geothermal wells generally relies on a few conventional methods: long string, liner-tieback, and two-stage methods. Each has challenges for primary cementing that will be analyzed, compared, and discussed in detail. Geothermal wells pose challenges of low fracture gradients and massive lost circulation due to numerous fractures, which often lead to a need for remedial cementing jobs such as squeeze cementing and lost circulation plugs. Special considerations for remedial cementing in geothermal wells are also discussed here. Primary cement design is critical to ensure long-term integrity of a geothermal well. The cement sheath must be able to withstand pressure and temperature cycles when steam is produced and resist corrosive reservoir fluids due to the presence of H2S and CO2. Any fluid trapped within the casing-casing annulus poses a risk of casing collapse due to expansion under high temperatures encountered during the production phase. With the high heating rate of the geothermal well, temperature prediction plays an important part in cement design. Free fluid sensitivity test and centralizer selection also play an important role in avoiding mud channeling as well as preventing the development of fluid pockets. Analysis and comparison of every method is described in detail to enable readers to choose the best approach. Massive lost circulation is very common in surface and intermediate sections of geothermal wells. On numerous occasions, treatment with conventional lost-circulation material (LCM) was unable to cure the losses, resulting in the placement of multiple cement plugs. An improved lost circulation plug design and execution method are introduced to control massive losses in a geothermal environment. In addition, the paper will present operational best practices and lessons learned from the authors’ experience with cementing in geothermal wells in Indonesia. Geothermal wells can be constructed in different ways by different operators. In light of this, an analysis of different cementing approaches has been conducted to ensure robust cement design and a fit-for-purpose cementing method. This paper will discuss the cementing design, equipment, recommendations, and best available practices for excellence in operational execution to achieve optimal long-life zonal isolation for a geothermal well.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiangyu Liu ◽  
Katherine Aughenbaugh ◽  
Hanna Lee ◽  
Sriramya Nair ◽  
Eric van Oort

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adelson Barros ◽  
Ahmed Rashed Alaleeli ◽  
Ahmedagha Hamidzada ◽  
Azza El Hassan ◽  
Alexandre Melo ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi Li ◽  
Mohammad Solim Ullah ◽  
Wu Chang Ai ◽  
Thirayu Khumtong ◽  
Kantaphon Temaismithi ◽  
...  

Abstract In Myanmar offshore, a substantially promising gas reservoir was discovered, the objective of primary cementing is to achieve long term zonal isolation, as any gas migration to surface would cause production loss, as well as significant security issues. Remedial cementing work will cause costly non production time, while the result will be compromised. Shallow gas migration, lost circulation and mud removal, all these factors cause undesired negative effects for cementing design, While the objective is to provide a firm barrier and good zonal isolation, this paper will describe in details the cementing challenge, the methodology, and how the slurry parameter was designed and evaluated for a Fit-For-Purpose solution.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Mohammed Dooply ◽  
Michael Schupbach ◽  
Kenneth Hampshire ◽  
Jose Contreras ◽  
Nicolas Flamant

Summary Two of the most important parameters to monitor during a primary cementing job are the flow rate in and return flow rate measurements. To achieve optimum job results of a primary cementing job, measuring annular return rates and comparing them with simulated data in real time will provide a better understanding of job signatures and result in the best possible top of cement (TOC) estimation prior to running any cement evaluation log or making a decision to continue drilling the next section of the well. The return rate job signature along with the wellhead pressure is essential to understanding the behavior and discrepancies between simulated and acquired surface data. Therefore, to assess the risk of job issues, such as unsuspected washout and lost circulation among others, accurate measurements of the return rate are critical. Historically, the cement job evaluation has been limited by the fact that most drilling rigs do not have an accurate flowmeter installed on the annulus return line, and a simple verification of mud tanks volume vs. pumped volume, as reported by drillers or mud loggers, more often than not results in an unreliable assessment of the volume lost downhole, due to the unfamiliarity with the U-tubing effect and lack of data consolidation from the cement unit (flow rate in) and the rig (flow rate in and flow rate out). In this paper, we will review a solution developed to mitigate the lack of a direct flow-rate measurement by computing and displaying the return rate using either a paddle meter measurement or the derivative over time of the volume observed in the rig tanks.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kory Hugentobler ◽  
Joseph M. Shine ◽  
Alejandro De La Cruz Sasso ◽  
Abdulmalek Shamsan ◽  
Sandip Patil ◽  
...  

Abstract In certain regions of oil and gas operations, lost circulation is a common occurrence, especially when a majority of the openhole exposed during primary cementing is carbonate-based formations. This can lead to lost circulation risks in most applications. To overcome lost circulation risks during primary cementing, a new tailored spacer system shows to improve the cement placement success. The manuscript discusses the quality assurance and performance testing with field cases demonstrating the value contributions of the spacer for achieving zonal isolation requirements as well as the top of cement objectives. The work efforts presented shows a spacer meeting and sometimes showing incremental wellbore strengthening in comparison to the published literature for existing available spacers used to overcome similar lost circulation risks.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document