Mechanistic Interpretation and Utilization of Viscoelastic Behavior of Polymer Solutions for Improved Polymer-Flood Efficiency

Author(s):  
Mojdeh Delshad ◽  
Do Hoon Kim ◽  
Oluwaseun Adedeji Magbagbeola ◽  
Chun Huh ◽  
Gary Arnold Pope ◽  
...  
1959 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 101-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tadao Kotaka ◽  
Michio Kurata ◽  
Shigeharu Onogi

2006 ◽  
Vol 39 (19) ◽  
pp. 6677-6685 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jung Hun Lee ◽  
Justin M. Goldberg ◽  
Lewis J. Fetters ◽  
Lynden A. Archer

1981 ◽  
Vol 21 (10) ◽  
pp. 619-623 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kaoru Umeya ◽  
Yasufumi Otsubo

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 3779-3789 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tina Coolman ◽  
David Alexander ◽  
Rean Maharaj ◽  
Mohammad Soroush

Abstract The economy of Trinidad and Tobago which mainly relies on its energy sector is facing significant challenges due to declining crude oil production in a low commodity price environment. The need for enhanced oil recovery (EOR) methods to meet the current and future energy demands is urgent. Studies on the use of polymer flooding in Trinidad and Tobago are limited, especially in terms of necessary data concerning the characterization of the adsorption of polymer flooding chemicals such as xanthan gum and aquagel polymers on different soil types in Trinidad and the viscosity characteristics of the polymer flooding solutions which affect the key attributes of displacement and sweep efficiency that are needed to predict recovery efficiency and the potential use of these flooding agents in a particular well. Adsorption and viscosity experiments were conducted using xanthan gum and aquagel on three different soil types, namely sand, Valencia clay (high iron) and Longdenville clay (low iron). Xanthan gum exhibited the lowest adsorption capacity for Valencia clay but absorbed most on sand at concentrations above 1000 ppm and Longdenville clay below 1000 ppm. At concentrations below 250 ppm, all three soil-type absorbent materials exhibited similar adsorption capacities. Aquagel was more significantly absorbed on the three soil types compared to xanthan gum. The lowest adsorption capacity was observed for Valencia clay at concentration levels above 500 ppm; however, the clay had the highest adsorption capacity below this level. Sand had the highest adsorption capacity for aquagel at concentrations above 500 ppm while Longdenville clay was the lowest absorbent above 500 ppm. Generally, all three soil types had a similar adsorption capacity for xanthan gum at a concentration level of 250 ppm and for aquagel at a concentration level of 500 ppm. The results offered conclusive evidence demonstrating the importance that the pore structure characteristics of soil that may be present in oil wells on its adsorption characteristics and efficiency. Xanthan gum polymer concentration of 2000 ppm, 1000 ppm and 250 ppm showed viscosities of 125 cp, 63 cp and 42 cp, respectively. Aquagel polymer concentrations of 2000 ppm, 1000 ppm and 250 ppm showed viscosities of 63 cp, 42 cp and 21 cp, respectively. Aquagel polymer solutions were found to generally have lower viscosities than the xanthan gum polymer solutions at the same concentration. Adsorption and viscosity data for the xanthan gum and aquagel polymers were incorporated within CMG numerical simulation models to determine the technical feasibility of implementing a polymer flood in the selected EOR 44 located in the Oropouche field in the southwest peninsula of the island of Trinidad. Overall, aquagel polymer flood resulted in a higher oil recovery of 0.06 STB compared to the xanthan gum polymer flood, so the better EOR method would be aquagel polymer flood. Additionally, both cases of polymer flooding resulted in higher levels of oil recovery compared to CO2 injection and waterflooding and therefore polymer flooding will have greater impact on the EOR 44 well oil recovery.


1975 ◽  
Vol 15 (04) ◽  
pp. 338-346 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.T. Szabo

Abstract Numerous polymer floods were performed in unconsolidated sand packs using a C14-tagged, cross-linked, partially hydrolyzed ployacrylamide, and the data are compared with brine-flood performance in the same sands. performance in the same sands. The amount of "polymer oil" was linearly proportional to polymer concentration up to a proportional to polymer concentration up to a limiting value. The upper limit of polymer concentration yielding additional polymer oil was considerably higher for a high-permeability sand than for a low-permeability sand. It is shown that a minimum polymer concentration exists, below which no appreciable polymer oil can be produced in high-permeability sands. The effect of polymer slug size on oil recovery is shown for various polymer concentrations, and the results from these tests are used to determine the optimum slug size and polymer concentration for different sands. The effect of salinity was studied by using brine and tap water during polymer floods under similar conditions. Decreased salinity resulted in improved oil recovery at low, polymer concentrations, but it had little effect at higher polymer concentrations. Polymer injection that was started at an advanced stage of brine flood also improved the oil recovery in single-layered sand packs. Experimental data are presented showing the effect of polymer concentration and salinity on polymer-flood performance in stratified reservoir polymer-flood performance in stratified reservoir models. Polymer concentrations in the produced water were measured by analyzing the radioactivity of effluent samples, and the amounts of retained polymer in the stratified models are given for each polymer in the stratified models are given for each experiment. Introduction In the early 1960's, a new technique using dilute polymer solutions to increase oil recovery was polymer solutions to increase oil recovery was introduced in secondary oil-recovery operations. Since then, this new technique has attained wide-spread commercial application. The success and the complexity of this new technology has induced many authors to investigate many aspects of this flooding technique. Laboratory and field studies, along with numerical simulation of polymer flooding, clearly demonstrated that polymer additives increase oil recovery. polymer additives increase oil recovery. Some of the laboratory results have shown that applying polymers in waterflooding reduces the residual oil saturation through an improvement in microscopic sweep efficiency. Other laboratory studies have shown that applying polymer solutions improves the sweep efficiency in polymer solutions improves the sweep efficiency in heterogeneous systems. Numerical simulation of polymer flooding, and a summary of 56 field applications, clearly showed that polymer injection initiated at an early stage of waterflooding is more efficient than when initiated at an advanced stage. Although much useful information has been presented, the experimental conditions were so presented, the experimental conditions were so variable that difficulties arose in correlating the numerical data. So, despite this good data, a systematic laboratory study of the factors influencing the performance of polymer flooding was still lacking in the literature. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of polymer concentration, polymer slug size, salinity in the polymer bank, initial water saturation, and permeability on the performance of polymer floods. The role of oil viscosity did not constitute a subject of this investigation. However, some of the data indicated that the applied polymer resulted in added recovery when displacing more viscous oil. The linear polymer-flood tests were coupled with tests in stratified systems, consisting of the same sand materials used in linear flood tests. Thus, it was possible to differentiate between the role of polymer in mobility control behind the flood front in each layer and its role in mobility control in the entire stratified system through improvement in vertical sweep efficiency. A radioactive, C14-tagged hydrolyzed polyacrylamide was used in all oil-recovery tests. polyacrylamide was used in all oil-recovery tests. SPEJ P. 338


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document