Comparison of Computational Fluid Dynamics of Erosion in Coiled Tubing to Field and Test Data

Author(s):  
Randy S. Rosine ◽  
Ivan Blanco ◽  
Michael Bailey
Author(s):  
M. T. F. Owen ◽  
D. G. Kröger

The development of an efficient and reliable method of evaluating the performance of an air-cooled steam condenser (ACC) under windy conditions using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is presented. A two-step modeling approach is employed as a result of computational limitations. The numerical ACC model developed in this study makes use of the pressure jump fan model, among other approximations, in an attempt to minimize the computational expense of the performance evaluation. The accuracy of the numerical model is verified through a comparison of the numerical results to test data collected during full-scale tests carried out on an operational ACC. Good correlation is achieved between the numerical results and test data. The effect of wind on ACC performance at El Dorado Power Plant (Nevada, USA) is investigated. It is found that reduced fan performance due to distorted flow at the inlet of the upstream fans is the primary contributor to the reduction in ACC performance associated with increased wind speed in this case. The model developed in this study has the potential to allow for the evaluation of large ACC installations and provides a reliable platform from which further investigations into improving ACC performance under windy conditions can be carried out.


2014 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 735-749 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Guy Schauerhamer ◽  
Kerry A. Zarchi ◽  
William L. Kleb ◽  
Karl T. Edquist

2021 ◽  
Vol 73 (03) ◽  
pp. 63-64
Author(s):  
Judy Feder

This article, written by JPT Technology Editor Judy Feder, contains highlights of paper SPE 199268, “Upscaling Laboratory Formation Damage Laboratory Test Data,” by Michael Byrne, SPE, Lesmana Djayapertapa, and Ken Watson, SPE, Lloyd’s Register, et al., prepared for the 2020 SPE International Conference and Exhibition on Formation Damage Control, Lafayette, Louisiana, 19-21 February. The paper has not been peer reviewed. Through several case histories, the complete paper demonstrates applications of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modeling to upscaling of laboratory-measured formation damage and reveals implications for well and completion design. The value of laboratory testing is quantified and interesting challenges to conventional wisdom are highlighted. Introduction Laboratory formation damage testing is often used to help select optimal drilling and completion fluids. Test procedures such as sand retention and return permeability represent an attempt to simulate near-wellbore conditions during well construction and production. To determine what degree of permeability impairment is allowable, further interpretation that cannot be provided using classical nodal analysis or reservoir simulation methods is required. The complete paper describes the evolution of, and potential for, more-comprehensive upscaling and outlines the importance of consideration of full well geometry when designing and interpreting coreflood tests for formation damage. CFD simulations provide a means to upscale suitable laboratory test data to predict effect on well performance. Methods CFD simulations use a relatively simple, steady-state, static damage model that takes endpoint data from laboratory core tests and translates the data into parameters that are used for input into well geometry. Although this method has its merits and is a considerable advance on previous, more-simplistic upscaling attempts, it does not necessarily present the full picture of damage evolution in the near-wellbore. A transient model of damage with data again derived from laboratory coreflood data could reveal more about well cleanup and progressive damage removal. Steady-State Modeling. No API recommended practice for return permeability testing exists. Laboratories have their own procedures that comply broadly with recommended procedures developed some time ago. Operators and consultants, too, have their own procedures, which they often ask laboratories to follow. Although no recommended practice exists, evaluation of drilling and completion fluids usually involves measurement of a base permeability and remeasurement of a return permeability—or several—after application of the test fluid or fluids. In many cases, the laboratory removes the external mud cake or trims a slice of the end of the plug to measure return permeability without mud cake (Fig. 1).


2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Oldfield ◽  
M. Moradi Larmaei ◽  
A. Kendrick ◽  
K. McTaggart

Verification and validation has been completed for the use of computational fluid dynamics as a practical means of simulating captive manoeuvring model tests. Verification includes spatial and temporal refinement studies. Direct validation includes the comparison of individual steady drift and planar motion mechanism simulations to physical model test data. Rotating arm simulations are validated indirectly on the basis of manoeuvring derivatives developed from the PMM tests. The merits of steady and unsteady simulations are discussed.


Author(s):  
N R J Williams

This paper investigates the potential performance improvements of adding contracted loaded tips to propellers. A Wageningen B5-75 Series propeller has been simulated and verified against published experimental test data. Contracted tips have then been added to a Wageningen propeller and the modified propeller then simulated. A CFD method and model has been developed. Pressure, velocity and vector plots have all been analysed detailing the mechanism behind the contracted tips. Limitations behind this method have been explored and explained, and recommendations for further studies made. The development of a database of propeller characteristics and performance chart data to allow quick evaluation of designs has also been proposed. 


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document