Streamline-Based Reservoir Model Calibration to Three-Phase Production Data

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adedayo Oyerinde
Keyword(s):  
Model Calibration ◽  
Production Data ◽  
Reservoir Model ◽  
Three Phase ◽  
Phase Production

Analysis of time-lapse seismic and production data for reservoir model classification and assessment

2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 1561-1587 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rafael Souza ◽  
David Lumley ◽  
Jeffrey Shragge ◽  
Alessandra Davolio ◽  
Denis José Schiozer
Keyword(s):  
Time Lapse ◽  
Production Data ◽  
Reservoir Model ◽  
Model Classification

IMAGING ADDITIONAL OIL AND GAS RESERVES, INTEGRATING WELL PRODUCTION DATA AND 3D SEISMIC AVO CLASSIFICATION TO IMAGE REMAINING OIL AND GAS RESERVES—A CASE STUDY ON THE NGATORO FIELD, TARANAKI, NEW ZEALAND

2001 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 679
Author(s):  
S. Reymond ◽  
E. Matthews ◽  
B. Sissons
Keyword(s):  
New Zealand ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Seismic Facies ◽  
Bright Spot ◽  
Production Data ◽  
3D Seismic ◽  
Reservoir Model ◽  
Reservoir Properties ◽  
Well Production

This case study illustrates how 3D generalised inversion of seismic facies for reservoir parameters can be successfully applied to image and laterally predict reservoir parameters in laterally discontinuous turbiditic depositional environment where hydrocarbon pools are located in complex combined stratigraphic-structural traps. Such conditions mean that structural mapping is inadequate to define traps and to estimate reserves in place. Conventional seismic amplitude analysis has been used to aid definition but was not sufficient to guarantee presence of economic hydrocarbons in potential reservoir pools. The Ngatoro Field in Taranaki, New Zealand has been producing for nine years. Currently the field is producing 1,000 bopd from seven wells and at three surface locations down from a peak of over 1,500 bopd. The field production stations have been analysed using new techniques in 3D seismic imaging to locate bypassed oils and identify undrained pools. To define the objectives of the study, three questions were asked:Can we image reservoir pools in a complex stratigraphic and structural environment where conventional grid-based interpretation is not applicable due to lack of lateral continuity in reservoir properties?Can we distinguish fluids within each reservoir pools?Can we extrapolate reservoir parameters observed at drilled locations to the entire field using 3D seismic data to build a 3D reservoir model?Using new 3D seismic attributes such as bright spot indicators, attenuation and edge enhancing volumes coupled with 6 AVO (Amplitude Versus Offset) volumes integrated into a single class cube of reservoir properties, made the mapping of reservoir pools possible over the entire data set. In addition, four fluid types, as observed in more than 20 reservoir pools were validated by final inverted results to allow lateral prediction of fluid contents in un-drilled reservoir targets. Well production data and 3D seismic inverted volume were later integrated to build a 3D reservoir model to support updated volumetrics reserves computation and to define additional targets for exploration drilling, additional well planning and to define a water injection plan for pools already in production.

A Practical Data Integration Approach to History Matching: Application to a Deepwater Reservoir

SPE Journal ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 11 (04) ◽  
pp. 464-479 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Todd Hoffman ◽  
Jef K. Caers ◽  
Xian-Huan Wen ◽  
Sebastien B. Strebelle
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Data ◽  
History Matching ◽  
Production Data ◽  
Well Log ◽  
Initial Model ◽  
Reservoir Model ◽  
Dynamic Data ◽  
History Match ◽  
Reservoir Models ◽  
Geologic Information

Summary This paper presents an innovative methodology to integrate prior geologic information, well-log data, seismic data, and production data into a consistent 3D reservoir model. Furthermore, the method is applied to a real channel reservoir from the African coast. The methodology relies on the probability-perturbation method (PPM). Perturbing probabilities rather than actual petrophysical properties guarantees that the conceptual geologic model is maintained and that any history-matching-related artifacts are avoided. Creating reservoir models that match all types of data are likely to have more prediction power than methods in which some data are not honored. The first part of the paper reviews the details of the PPM, and the next part of this paper describes the additional work that is required to history-match real reservoirs using this method. Then, a geological description of the reservoir case study is provided, and the procedure to build 3D reservoir models that are only conditioned to the static data is covered. Because of the character of the field, the channels are modeled with a multiple-point geostatistical method. The channel locations are perturbed in a manner such that the oil, water, and gas rates from the reservoir more accurately match the rates observed in the field. Two different geologic scenarios are used, and multiple history-matched models are generated for each scenario. The reservoir has been producing for approximately 5 years, but the models are matched only to the first 3 years of production. Afterward, to check predictive power, the matched models are run for the last 1½ years, and the results compare favorably with the field data. Introduction Reservoir models are constructed to better understand reservoir behavior and to better predict reservoir response. Economic decisions are often based on the predictions from reservoir models; therefore, such predictions need to be as accurate as possible. To achieve this goal, the reservoir model should honor all sources of data, including well-log, seismic, geologic information, and dynamic (production rate and pressure) data. Incorporating dynamic data into the reservoir model is generally known as history matching. History matching is difficult because it poses a nonlinear inverse problem in the sense that the relationship between the reservoir model parameters and the dynamic data is highly nonlinear and multiple solutions are avail- able. Therefore, history matching is often done with a trial-and-error method. In real-world applications of history matching, reservoir engineers manually modify an initial model provided by geoscientists until the production data are matched. The initial model is built based on geological and seismic data. While attempts are usually made to honor these other data as much as possible, often the history-matched models are unrealistic from a geological (and geophysical) point of view. For example, permeability is often altered to increase or decrease flow in areas where a mismatch is observed; however, the permeability alterations usually come in the form of box-shaped or pipe-shaped geometries centered around wells or between wells and tend to be devoid of any geologica. considerations. The primary focus lies in obtaining a history match.

Fit-For-Purpose History Matching Approach for A Low-Quality Reservoir Under Waterflood: Integration of Uncertain Production Allocation

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Syafwan
Keyword(s):  
History Matching ◽  
Production Data ◽  
Reservoir Pressure ◽  
Reservoir Model ◽  
Production Forecast ◽  
Oil Saturation ◽  
Production Allocation ◽  
Fluid Production ◽  
Fit For Purpose ◽  
Well Level

This paper presents a fit-for-purpose approach to mitigate zonal production data allocation uncertainty during history matching of a reservoir simulation model due to limited production logging data. To avoid propagating perforation/production zone allocation uncertainty at commingled wells into the history matched reservoir model, only well-level production data from historical periods when production was from a single zone were used to calibrate reservoir properties that determine initial volumetric. Then, during periods of the history with commingled production, average reservoir pressure measurements were integrated into the model to allocate fluid production to the target reservoir. Last, the periods constrained by dedicated well-level fluid production and average reservoir pressure were merged over the forty-eight-year history to construct a single history matched reservoir model in preparation for waterflood performance forecasting. This innovative history matching approach, which mitigates the impacts of production allocation uncertainty by using different intervals of the historical data to calibrate model saturations and model pressures, has provided a new interpretation of OOIP and current recovery factor, as well as drive mechanisms including aquifer strength and capillary pressure. Fluid allocation from the target reservoir in the history matched model is 85% lower than previously estimated. The history matched model was used as a quantitative forecasting and optimization tool to expand the recent waterflood with improved production forecast reliability. The remaining mobile oil saturation map and streamline-based waterflood diagnostics have improved understanding of injector-producer connectivity and swept pore volumes, e.g., current swept volumes are minor and well-centric with limited indication of breakthrough at adjacent producers resulting in high remaining mobile oil saturation. Accordingly, the history matched model provides a foundation to select new injection points, determine dedicated producer locations and support optimized injection strategies to improve recovery.

scholarly journals Analysis of Time-Lapse Seismic and Production Data for Systematic Reservoir Model Classification and Assessment

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Rafael Souza ◽  
David Lumley ◽  
Jeffrey Shragge ◽  
Alessandra Davolio ◽  
Denis Schiozer
Keyword(s):  
Time Lapse ◽  
Production Data ◽  
Reservoir Model ◽  
Model Classification
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document