Verification and Proper Use of Water-Oil Transfer Function for Dual-Porosity and Dual-Permeability Reservoirs

2009 ◽  
Vol 12 (02) ◽  
pp. 189-199 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adetayo S. Balogun ◽  
Hossein Kazemi ◽  
Erdal Ozkan ◽  
Mohammed Al-kobaisi ◽  
Benjamin Ramirez

Summary Accurate calculation of multiphase fluid transfer between the fracture and matrix in naturally fractured reservoirs is a very crucial issue. In this paper, we will present the viability of the use of a simple transfer function to accurately account for fluid exchange resulting from capillary and gravity forces between fracture and matrix in dual-porosity and dual-permeability numerical models. With this approach, fracture- and matrix-flow calculations can be decoupled and solved sequentially, improving the speed and ease of computation. In fact, the transfer-function equations can be used easily to calculate the expected oil recovery from a matrix block of any dimension without the use of a simulator or oil-recovery correlations. The study was accomplished by conducting a 3-D fine-grid simulation of a typical matrix block and comparing the results with those obtained through the use of a single-node simple transfer function for a water-oil system. This study was similar to a previous study (Alkandari 2002) we had conducted for a 1D gas-oil system. The transfer functions of this paper are specifically for the sugar-cube idealization of a matrix block, which can be extended to simulation of a match-stick idealization in reservoir modeling. The basic data required are: matrix capillary-pressure curves, densities of the flowing fluids, and matrix block dimensions. Introduction Naturally fractured reservoirs contain a significant amount of the known petroleum hydrocarbons worldwide and, hence, are an important source of energy fuels. However, the oil recovery from these reservoirs has been rather low. For example, the Circle Ridge Field in Wind River Reservation, Wyoming, has been producing for 50 years, but the oil recovery is less than 15% (Golder Associates 2004). This low level of oil recovery points to the need for accurate reservoir characterization, realistic geological modeling, and accurate flow simulation of naturally fractured reservoirs to determine the locations of bypassed oil. Reservoir simulation is the most practical method of studying flow problems in porous media when dealing with heterogeneity and the simultaneous flow of different fluids. In modeling fractured systems, a dual-porosity or dual-permeability concept typically is used to idealize the reservoir on the global scale. In the dual-porosity concept, fluids transfer between the matrix and fractures in the grid-cells while flowing through the fracture network to the wellbore. Furthermore, the bulk of the fluids are stored in the matrix. On the other hand, in the dual-permeability concept, fluids flow through the fracture network and between matrix blocks. In both the dual-porosity and dual-permeability formulations, the fractures and matrices are linked by transfer functions. The transfer functions account for fluid exchanges between both media. To understand the details of this fluid exchange, an elaborate method is used in this study to model flow in a single matrix block with fractures as boundaries. Our goal is to develop a technique to produce accurate results for use in large-scale modeling work.

2009 ◽  
Vol 12 (02) ◽  
pp. 200-210 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Ramirez ◽  
Hossein Kazemi ◽  
Mohammed Al-kobaisi ◽  
Erdal Ozkan ◽  
Safian Atan

Summary Accurate calculation of multiphase-fluid transfer between the fracture and matrix in naturally fractured reservoirs is a crucial issue. In this paper, we will present the viability of the use of simple transfer functions to account accurately for fluid exchange resulting from capillary, gravity, and diffusion mass transfer for immiscible flow between fracture and matrix in dual-porosity numerical models. The transfer functions are designed for sugar-cube or match-stick idealizations of matrix blocks. The study relies on numerical experiments involving fine-grid simulation of oil recovery from a typical matrix block by water or gas in an adjacent fracture. The fine-grid results for water/oil and gas/oil systems were compared with results obtained with transfer functions. In both water and gas injection, the simulations emphasize the interaction of capillary and gravity forces to produce oil, depending on the wettability of the matrix. In gas injection, the thermodynamic phase equilibrium, aided by gravity/capillary interaction and, to a lesser extent, by molecular diffusion, is a major contributor to interphase mass transfer. For miscible flow, the fracture/matrix mass transfer is less complicated because there are no capillary forces associated with solvent and oil; nevertheless, gravity contrast between solvent in the fracture and oil in the matrix creates convective mass transfer and drainage of oil. Using the transfer functions presented in this paper, fracture- and matrix-flow calculations can be decoupled and solved sequentially--reducing the complexity of the computation. Furthermore, the transfer-function equations can be used independently to calculate oil recovery from a matrix block.


2015 ◽  
Vol 18 (02) ◽  
pp. 187-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fikri Kuchuk ◽  
Denis Biryukov

Summary Fractures are common features in many well-known reservoirs. Naturally fractured reservoirs include fractured igneous, metamorphic, and sedimentary rocks (matrix). Faults in many naturally fractured carbonate reservoirs often have high-permeability zones, and are connected to numerous fractures that have varying conductivities. Furthermore, in many naturally fractured reservoirs, faults and fractures can be discrete (rather than connected-network dual-porosity systems). In this paper, we investigate the pressure-transient behavior of continuously and discretely naturally fractured reservoirs with semianalytical solutions. These fractured reservoirs can contain periodically or arbitrarily distributed finite- and/or infinite-conductivity fractures with different lengths and orientations. Unlike the single-derivative shape of the Warren and Root (1963) model, fractured reservoirs exhibit diverse pressure behaviors as well as more than 10 flow regimes. There are seven important factors that dominate the pressure-transient test as well as flow-regime behaviors of fractured reservoirs: (1) fractures intersect the wellbore parallel to its axis, with a dipping angle of 90° (vertical fractures), including hydraulic fractures; (2) fractures intersect the wellbore with dipping angles from 0° to less than 90°; (3) fractures are in the vicinity of the wellbore; (4) fractures have extremely high or low fracture and fault conductivities; (5) fractures have various sizes and distributions; (6) fractures have high and low matrix block permeabilities; and (7) fractures are damaged (skin zone) as a result of drilling and completion operations and fluids. All flow regimes associated with these factors are shown for a number of continuously and discretely fractured reservoirs with different well and fracture configurations. For a few cases, these flow regimes were compared with those from the field data. We performed history matching of the pressure-transient data generated from our discretely and continuously fractured reservoir models with the Warren and Root (1963) dual-porosity-type models, and it is shown that they yield incorrect reservoir parameters.


SPE Journal ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 11 (03) ◽  
pp. 328-340 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pallav Sarma ◽  
Khalid Aziz

Summary This paper discusses new techniques for the modeling and simulation of naturally fractured reservoirs with dual-porosity models. Most of the existing dual-porosity models idealize matrix-fracture interaction by assuming orthogonal fracture systems (parallelepiped matrix blocks) and pseudo-steady state flow. More importantly, a direct generalization of single-phase flow equations is used to model multiphase flow, which can lead to significant inaccuracies in multiphase flow-behavior predictions. In this work, many of these existing limitations are removed in order to arrive at a transfer function more representative of real reservoirs. Firstly, combining the differential form of the single-phase transfer function with analytical solutions of the pressure-diffusion equation, an analytical form for a shape factor for transient pressure diffusion is derived to corroborate its time dependence. Further, a pseudosteady shape factor for rhombic fracture systems is also derived and its effect on matrix-fracture mass transfer demonstrated. Finally, a general numerical technique to calculate the shape factor for any arbitrary shape of the matrix block (i.e., nonorthogonal fractures) is proposed. This technique also accounts for both transient and pseudosteady-state pressure behavior. The results were verified against fine-grid single-porosity models and were found to be in excellent agreement. Secondly, it is shown that the current form of the transfer function used in reservoir simulators does not fully account for the main mechanisms governing multiphase flow. A complete definition of the differential form of the transfer function for two-phase flow is derived and combined with the governing equations for pressure and saturation diffusion to arrive at a modified form of the transfer function for two-phase flow. The new transfer function accurately takes into account pressure diffusion (fluid expansion) and saturation diffusion (imbibition), which are the two main mechanisms driving multiphase matrix-fracture mass transfer. New shape factors for saturation diffusion are defined. It is shown that the prediction of wetting-phase imbibition using the current form of the transfer function can be quite inaccurate, which might have significant consequences from the perspective of reservoir management. Fine-grid single-porosity models are used to verify the validity of the new transfer function. The results from single-block dual-porosity models and the corresponding single-porosity fine-grid models were in good agreement. Introduction A naturally fractured reservoir (NFR) can be defined as a reservoir that contains a connected network of fractures (planar discontinuities) created by natural processes such as diastrophism and volume shrinkage (Ordonez et al. 2001). Fractured petroleum reservoirs represent over 20% of the world's oil and gas reserves (Saidi 1983), but are, however, among the most complicated class of reservoirs. A typical example is the Circle Ridge fractured reservoir located on the Wind River Reservation in Wyoming, U.S.. This reservoir has been in production for more than 50 years but the total oil recovery until now has been less than 15% (www.fracturedreservoirs.com 2000). It is undeniable that reservoir characterization, modeling, and simulation of naturally fractured reservoirs present unique challenges that differentiate them from conventional, single-porosity reservoirs. Not only do the intrinsic characteristics of the fractures, as well as the matrix, have to be characterized, but the interaction between matrix blocks and surrounding fractures must also be modeled accurately. Further, most of the major NFRs have active aquifers associated with them, or would eventually be subjected to some kind of secondary recovery process such as waterflooding (German 2002), implying that it is essential to have a good understanding of the physics of multiphase flow for such reservoirs. This complexity of naturally fractured reservoirs necessitates the need for their accurate representation from a modeling and simulation perspective, such that production and recovery from such reservoirs be predicted and optimized.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document