An Improved Simulation for Interpreting Temperature Logs in Water Injection Wells

1982 ◽  
Vol 22 (05) ◽  
pp. 709-718 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Fagley ◽  
H. Scott Fogler

Abstract An improved simulation for temperature logs (TL's) in water injection wells is described. Improvements based on the reduction of assumptions used by previous investigators are demonstrated by comparison of field data and simulator results showing excellent agreement of TL profiles over the entire well depth. Initial work with the simulator has demonstrated the need for different operational procedures for definite TL surveys in mature wells (those having received significant long-term injection) as compared with young wells. The utility of short-period hot water (SPHW) injection just preceding shut-in as an injection profile amplifying scheme has been investigated in depth through the TL simulator. Finally, sensitivity studies have been run to identify the most important TL parameters and to develop guidelines for improved profiling. Introduction Injection of water into wells is done for three basic reasons: to maintain field pressure, for waterflooding, or to dispose of unwanted brine. For at least two of these it is desirable to know an injection profile. The TL is one way of defining injection profiles and is particularly useful in wells with outside-of-casing vertical flow.As fluid flows down the wellbore, the rock surrounding the wellbore (which is initially at the prevailing geothermal temperature) is heated or cooled by the injection water, depending on its temperature and the rate of heat transfer in the well. This effect is most pronounced in an injection zone where the fluid enters the rock formation, flowing radially outward, and where heat transfer occurs by both convection arid conduction. Except for hot-water and steam injection, the near-wellbore portion of the flooded zone normally will be cooled. Once the well is shut in and fluid flow is halted, the temperature of the well and the surrounding formation starts to return to the original geothermal temperature. The regions above and below the injection zone trend toward the geothermal temperature more rapidly than in the injection zone because of the greater heat transfer in the latter. Thus, by measurement of the wellbore temperature as a function of depth the location of the injection zone can be determined as the region where temperature anomalies occur.The interpretation of TL's to determine injection flow profiles has been attempted previously, both qualitatively and quantitatively. In early studies, quantitative analysis was made by use of Laplace transformations and Bessel function solutions. With the advent of the digital computer, more rigorous analysis can be made with numerical methods to treat heat transfer terms, which had to be removed by simplifying assumptions in the earlier studies.In this paper, we present an improved injection-well temperature simulator of the digital computer variety. This simulator offers an advantage over previous simulators in that wellbore-water heat transfer is modeled both before and after shut-in of the well. This capability allowed us to investigate possible solutions to the problem of lost profile definition in mature injection wells. We have found hot-water injection, for a short period before shut-in, to be a potentially important tool for defining injection fluid profiles in mature wells. SPEJ P. 709^

1971 ◽  
Vol 11 (02) ◽  
pp. 185-197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Satter Abdus ◽  
David R. Parrish

Abstract The widely used Marx and Langenheim solution for reservoir heating by steam injection fails to account for the growth of the hot liquid zone ahead of the steam zone. Furthermore, that solution does not consider radial heat conduction both within and outside the reservoir and vertical conduction within the reservoir. In the present paper, a more realistic and generalized solution is provided by eliminating several restrictive assumptions of the ‘old theory'. However, fluid flow is not considered in this model. The partial-difference equations that describe the condensation within the steam zone and temperature distribution within the system have been solved by finite-difference schemes. Calculated results are presented to show the effects of steam injection pressures ranging from 500 to 2,500 psia and rates, 120 and 240 lb/hr-ft, on the growth of the steam and hot liquid zones. A 50-ft thick reservoir with fixed thermal and physical characteristics was considered. Results show that heat losses from the reservoir into the surrounding rocks are not greatly different from those predicted by Marx and Langenheim. However, the heat distribution is markedly different. A sizable portion of the reservoir heat was contained in the hot liquid zone which grows indefinitely. This means that heat (warm water) could arrive at the producing wells sooner than predicted by the old theory. This is particularly true for low injection rate or high injection pressure. Curiously, for a given injection rate and pressure, the heat content of the hot liquid zone remains (except for early times) essentially a constant percentage of the cumulative heat injected. INTRODUCTION In 1959. Marx and Langenheim1 made a theoretical study of reservoir heating by hot fluid injection. Their solution has been widely used in the industry for the evaluation of the steam-drive process. This solution, however, is based upon an unrealistic assumption that the growth of the hot liquid zone ahead of the steam zone is negligible. Therefore, it cannot predict the arrival of warm water at the producing wells earlier than steam. Furthermore, in the so-called ‘old theory', radial heat conduction both within and outside the reservoir was neglected. Willman et al.2 presented another analytical solution of the same problem. Their solution is comparable to the Marx-Langenheim solution and suffers from the same disadvantages. Wilson and Root3 presented a numerical solution for reservoir heating by steam injection. While radial and vertical heat conduction both within and outside the reservoir were considered, their solution was provided essentially for the injection of a noncondensable fictitious hot fluid. The specific heat of the injected fluid was assumed to be equal to the difference between the enthalpy of steam and the enthalpy of water at the reservoir temperature divided by the difference in the two temperatures. Baker4 carried out an experimental study of heat flow in steam flooding using a sand pack. 4 in. thick and 6 ft in diameter. The steam injection pressure was 2 to 5 psig and rates ranged from 22 to 299 lb/hr-ft. He showed that a significant portion of the injected heat was contained in the hot water zone. The theoretical steamed or heated volume, as calculated by the Marx and Langenheim method, fell between the experimental steamed and heated (including hot water) volumes. Spillette5 made a critical review of the known analytical solutions dealing with heat transfer during hot water injection into a reservoir. These solutions are based upon many restrictive assumptions similar to the simplified solutions of the steam heating process. Spillette also presented a numerical solution for multidimensional heat transfer problems associated with hot water injection and demonstrated the utility and accuracy of the method. Most mathematical models of steam and hot water recovery processes neglect fluid flow considerations.


2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. L. Delgadillo-Aya ◽  
M.L.. L. Trujillo-Portillo ◽  
J.M.. M. Palma-Bustamante ◽  
E.. Niz-Velasquez ◽  
C. L. Rodríguez ◽  
...  

Abstract Software tools are becoming an important ally in making decisions on the development or implementation of an enhanced oil recovery processes from the technical, financial or risk point of view. This work, can be manually developed in some cases, but becomes more efficient and precise with the help of these tools. In Ecopetrol was developed a tool to make technical and economic evaluation of enhanced oil recovery processes such as air injection, both cyclic and continuous steam injection, and steam assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) and hot water injection. This evaluation is performed using different types of analysis as binary screening, analogies, benchmarking, and prediction using analytical models and financial and risk analysis. All these evaluations are supported by a comprehensive review that has allowed initially find favorable conditions for different recovery methods evaluated, and get a probability of success based on this review. Subsequently, according to the method can be used different prediction methods, given an idea of the process behavior for a given period. Based on the prediction results, it is possible to feed the software to generate a financial assessment process, in line with cash flow previously developed that incorporates all the elements to be considered during the implementation of a project. This allows for greater support to the choice or not the application of a method. Finally the tool to evaluate the levels of risks that outlines the development of the project based on the existing internal methodology in the company, identifying the main and level of criticality and define actions for prevention, mitigation and risk elimination.


2014 ◽  
Vol 7 (11) ◽  
pp. 2345-2352
Author(s):  
Mohd. Amin Shoushtari ◽  
Sonny Irawan ◽  
A.P. Hussain Al Kayiem ◽  
Lim Pei Wen ◽  
Kan Wai Choong

1969 ◽  
Vol 9 (04) ◽  
pp. 375-377 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Romero-Juarez

Interest in temperature logs has been renewed recently. One of the main problems of temperature logs in injection wells is that of determining the zones that are taking fluids. A great step toward solving this problem has been reported in a recent paper. paper. The purpose of this paper is to point out another aim of temperature logging namely, that of relating the flow rate in water injection wells to some characteristics of the temperature logs. It has been stated that a factor of 6:1 gives approximate values in converting into B/D. The factor F, which has been found empirically, may be explained from theoretical considerations and because of this, it may be estimated more accurately. It has been shown that, for flow of a liquid ,............................(1) where .......................(2) a quantity that is different from zero. Eq. 1 can be written as ,..................................(3) which shows that, as is defined in Ref. 2, is identical to A. For injection down casing, the over-all heat transfer coefficient, U, may be considered infinite. Therefore, ...................................(4) Considering the wellbore as a linear point source, ....................(5) or, if ........................................(6) .......................(7) It has been observed that surprisingly good results are obtained by using the values k = 33.6 Btu/day-ft-F and a = 0.96 sq ft/day for different locations. Taking the values p = 350 lb/bbl, c = 1 Btu/lb-F, one obtains: ........................(8) It should be noted that the lower curve of Fig. 1 of Ref. 3 does not agree, for low values of t, with the solution .........................(9) corresponding to the constant heat flux line source and for this reason the graph should be used with caution. Eq. 8 has been plotted in Fig. 1 for three values of the external radius r'. It may be used to estimate the rate of water injection down casing from the shape of the injecting temperature log above the zone of entry of fluids. P. 375


1983 ◽  
Vol 23 (03) ◽  
pp. 427-439 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. van Lookeren

Abstract The flow of oil and water in a reservoir as a result of steam injection is related to the shape of the growing steam zone. Analytical formulas describing the approximate shape of this zone have been derived both for linear flow in horizontal and dipping formations and for radial flow around injection wells in a horizontal formation. The theory is based on segregated-flow principles such as those previously used by Dupuit,1 Dietz,2 and others. The formulas take into account gravity overlay of steam zones and have been checked against results of scaled laboratory experiments, steam-injction projects in the field, and calculations with a numerical reservoir simulator. From the good agreement with the new calculation method it would seem that the shape of a steam zone is controlled mainly by one group of parameters including steam-injection rate, pressure, and effective formation permeability to steam. The equations can be used to analyze and explain field observations, such as the position of steam/liquid contacts in injection wells, estimates of effective permeability to steam in steam zones, and steam-zone thickness as noticed in observation wells. This paper shows, for example, how a cumulative oil/steam ratio for oil displaced from a steam zone depends on steam-zone pressure, injection rate, and time. With increasing oil viscosity, more bypassing of oil by steam owing to viscous forces will occur, leading to more overlay of steam zones and eventually to narrow tonguing in a lateral direction. The calculation methods provide an evaluation tool for steam drive and steam-soak processes to reservoir engineers engaged in field operations, project design, and research. Introduction The reservoir engineer is often confronted with many day-to-day problems in designing, planning, and starting up steam-injection projects and monitoring their performance analysis and improvement in which fast and simple, although approximate, engineering calculation methods could be used to advantage. By presenting calculation methods for linear and radial steam flow in oil reservoirs, a tool is provided to gain a better understanding of the shape and growth of steam zones in reservoirs subjected to steam injection. A selection has been made from reservoir engineering literature, laboratory experiments, and field data to introduce the essentials of the calculation methods for making estimates with respect to performance, sweep efficiency, optimization, etc., of steam-injection processes in actual oil reservoirs. Oil displaced from steam zones is calculated, but no attempt has been made to arrive at a full prediction tool for oil production from reservoirs by adding calculations for oil quantities displaced by cold- and hot-water drives and even miscible drives, if the oil has volatile components. With the present capacities of mathematical reservoir simulation programs, adequate integration of simultaneously occurring oil-displacement processes seems more appropriate for the large computer.


2021 ◽  
Vol 931 (1) ◽  
pp. 012002
Author(s):  
A Pituganova ◽  
I Minkhanov ◽  
A Bolotov ◽  
M Varfolomeev

Abstract Thermal enhanced oil recovery techniques, especially steam injection, are the most successful techniques for extra heavy crude oil reservoirs. Steam injection and its variations are based on the decrease in oil viscosity with increasing temperature. The main objective of this study is the development of advanced methods for the production of extra heavy crude oil in the oilfield of the Republic of Tatarstan. The filtration experiment was carried out on a bulk model of non-extracted core under reservoir conditions. The experiment involves the injection of slugs of fresh water, hot water and steam. At the stage of water injection, no oil production was observed while during steam injection recovery factor (RF) achieved 13.4 % indicating that fraction of immobile oil and non-vaporizing residual components is high and needed to be recovered by steam assisted EORs.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuang Zheng ◽  
Mukul Sharma

Abstract Reservoir cooling during waterflooding or waste-water injection can significantly alter the reservoir stress field by thermo-poro-elastic effects. Colloidal particles in the injected water decrease the matrix permeability and buildup the injection pressure. Fractures may initiate and propagate from injectors. These fractures are of great concern for both environmental reasons and strong influence on reservoir sweep and oil recovery. This paper introduces methods to fully couple reservoir simulation with wellbore flow models in fractured injection wells. A method to fully couple reservoir-fracture-wellbore models was developed. Fluid flow, solid mechanics, energy balance, fracture propagation, and particle filtration are modelled in the reservoir, fracture and wellbore domains. Effective stress in the reservoir domain is altered by thermo-poro-elastic effects during cold water injection. Fracture initiation and propagation induced by thermal and filtration effects is modelled in the fracture domain. Particle filtration on the borehole and fracture surfaces is modelled by matrix permeability reduction and filter cake build-up. Leakoff through the borehole and fracture surface is balanced dynamically. The coupled nonlinear system of equations is solved implicitly using Newton-Raphson method. We validate our model with existing analytical solutions for simple cases. We show how the poro-elasticity effect, thermo-elasticity effect, water quality, and wellbore open/cased conditions influence well injectivity, induced fracture propagation and flow distribution. Simulation results show that water quality and thermal effects control fluid leak-off and fracture growth. While it is difficult to predict the exact location of fracture initiation due to reservoir heterogeneity, we proposed a reasonable method to handle fracture initiation without predefined fracture location in the water injection applications. In open-hole completions, this may lead to "thief" fractures propagating deep into the reservoir. Thermal stress changes in the injection zone are shown to be significant because of the combined effect of forced convection, heat conduction and poroelasticity. The accurate predictions of thermal stress in different reservoir layers allow us to study fracture height growth and containment numerically for the first time. We show that controlling the temperature and the injection water quality is also found to be an effective way to ensure fracture containment.


10.2118/95-pa ◽  
1962 ◽  
Vol 14 (04) ◽  
pp. 436-440 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.P. Squier ◽  
D.D. Smith ◽  
E.L. Dougherty

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document