Effects of Solids Loading on Drag Reduction in Polymeric Drilling Fluids Through Straight and Coiled Tubing

2002 ◽  
Vol 41 (05) ◽  
Author(s):  
S.N. Shah ◽  
M. Tareen ◽  
D. Clark
Keyword(s):  
Drag Reduction ◽  
Drilling Fluids ◽  
Coiled Tubing ◽  
Solids Loading

Rheological Properties and Frictional Pressure Loss of Drilling, Completion, and Stimulation Fluids in Coiled Tubing

2004 ◽  
Vol 126 (2) ◽  
pp. 153-161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yunxu Zhou ◽  
Subhash N. Shah
Keyword(s):  
Drag Reduction ◽  
Rheological Properties ◽  
Pressure Loss ◽  
Hydroxyethyl Cellulose ◽  
Test Facility ◽  
Drilling Mud ◽  
Polymeric Fluids ◽  
Pressure Losses ◽  
Coiled Tubing ◽  
Friction Pressure

The rheological properties and friction pressure losses of several common well-drilling, completion, and stimulation fluids have been investigated experimentally. These fluids include polymeric fluids—Xanthan gum, partially hydrolyzed polyacrylamide (PHPA), guar gum, and hydroxyethyl cellulose (HEC), bentonite drilling mud, oil-based drilling mud, and guar-based fracturing slurries. Rheological measurements using a Bohlin CS 50 rheometer and a model 35 Fann viscometer showed that these fluids exhibit shear thinning and thermal thinning behavior except the bentonite drilling mud whose viscosity increased as the temperature was raised. Flow experiments using a full-scale coiled tubing test facility showed that the friction pressure loss in coiled tubing is significantly higher than in straight tubing. Since the polymeric fluids displayed drag reducing property, their drag reduction behavior in straight and coiled tubings was analyzed and compared. Plots of drag reduction vs. generalized Reynolds number indicate that the drag reduction in coiled tubing was not affected by polymer concentration as much as in straight tubing. The onsets of turbulence and drag reduction in coiled tubing were significantly delayed as compared with straight tubing. The effect of solids content on the friction pressure losses in coiled tubing is also briefly discussed.

Maximum Drag Reduction Asymptote of Polymeric Fluid Flow in Coiled Tubing

2008 ◽  
Vol 131 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Subhash N. Shah ◽  
Yunxu Zhou
Keyword(s):  
Drag Reduction ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Guar Gum ◽  
Oil And Gas Industry ◽  
Flow Loop ◽  
Polymeric Fluids ◽  
Curvature Ratio ◽  
Coiled Tubing ◽  
Industry Applications ◽  
Maximum Drag Reduction

This study experimentally investigates the drag reduction characteristics of the most commonly used polymer fluids in coiled tubing applications. The flow loop employed consists of 12.7mm straight and coiled tubing sections. The curvature ratio (a∕R, where a and R are the radii of the tubing and the reel drum, respectively) investigated is from 0.01 to 0.076, which covers the typical curvature ratio range encountered in the oil and gas industry applications. Fluids tested include xanthan gum, guar gum, and hydroxypropyl guar at various polymer concentrations. It is found that the drag reduction in coiled tubing is significantly lower than that in straight tubing, probably due to the effect of secondary flow in curved geometry. The onset of drag reduction is also found to be delayed as the curvature ratio was increased. A correlation for the maximum drag reduction (MDR) asymptote in coiled tubing is developed. When the curvature ratio is set to zero, the new correlation reduces to the well-known Virk’s MDR asymptote for dilute polymer solutions in straight pipes. A new drag reduction envelope is proposed for the analysis of drag reduction behavior of polymeric fluids in coiled tubing. Application of the new drag reduction envelope is also discussed.

Mechanical Impact Effects of Fluid Hammer Effects on Drag Reduction of Coiled Tubing

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Yongsheng Liu ◽  
Xing Qin ◽  
Yuchen Sun ◽  
Zijun Dou ◽  
Jiansong Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fluid Flow ◽  
Drag Reduction ◽  
Flow Rate ◽  
Fluid Velocity ◽  
Fluid Pressure ◽  
Great Influence ◽  
Radial Force ◽  
Fluid Flow Rate ◽  
Normal Contact ◽  
Coiled Tubing

Abstract Aiming at the oscillation drag reduction tool that improves the extension limit of coiled tubing downhole operations, the fluid hammer equation of the oscillation drag reducer is established based on the fluid hammer effect. The fluid hammer equation is solved by the asymptotic method, and the distribution of fluid pressure and flow velocity in coiled tubing with oscillation drag reducers is obtained. At the same time, the axial force and radial force of the coiled tubing caused by the fluid hammer oscillator are calculated according to the momentum theorem. The radial force will change the normal contact force of the coiled tubing which has a great influence on frictional drag. The results show that the fluid flow rate and pressure decrease stepwise from the oscillator position to the wellhead position, and the fluid flow rate and pressure will change abruptly during each valve opening and closing time. When the fluid passes through the oscillator, the unit mass fluid will generate an instantaneous axial tension due to the change in the fluid velocity, thereby converting the static friction into dynamic friction, which is conducive to the extend limit of coiled tubing.

NanoGram Detection of Drilling Fluids Additives for Uncertainty Reduction in Surface Logging

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Sherry Zhu ◽  
Marta Antoniv ◽  
Martin Poitzsch ◽  
Nouf Aljabri ◽  
Alberto Marsala
Keyword(s):  
Lag Time ◽  
Drilling Fluids ◽  
Detection Capability ◽  
Gas Well ◽  
Coiled Tubing ◽  
Logging While Drilling ◽  
Mud Logging ◽  
Drilling Conditions ◽  
Origin Assessment

Abstract Manual sampling rock cuttings off the shale shaker for lithology and petrophysical characterization is frequently performed during mud logging. Knowing the depth origin where the cuttings were generated is very important for correlating the cuttings to the petrophysical characterization of the formation. It is a challenge to accurately determine the depth origin of the cuttings, especially in horizontal sections and in coiled tubing drilling, where conventional logging while drilling is not accessible. Additionally, even in less challenging drilling conditions, many factors can contribute to an inaccurate assessment of the depth origin of the cuttings. Inaccuracies can be caused by variation of the annulus dimension used to determine the lag time (and thus the depth of the cuttings), by the shifting or scrambling of cuttings during their return trip back to the surface, and by the mislabelling of the cuttings during sampling. In this work, we report the synthesis and application of polystyrenic nanoparticles (NanoTags) in labeling cuttings for depth origin assessment. We have successfully tagged cuttings using two NanoTags during a drilling field test in a carbonate gas well and demonstrated nanogram detection capability of the tags via pyrolysis-GCMS using an internally developed workflow. The cuttings depth determined using our tags correlates well with the depth calculated by conventional mud logging techniques.

Rheological and Hydraulic Properties of Drilling, Completion, and Stimulation Fluids in Straight and Coiled Tubings

2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Zhou ◽  
S. N. Shah
Keyword(s):  
Drag Reduction ◽  
Guar Gum ◽  
Polymer Concentration ◽  
Hydroxyethyl Cellulose ◽  
Test Facility ◽  
Drilling Mud ◽  
Polymeric Fluids ◽  
Pressure Losses ◽  
Coiled Tubing ◽  
Friction Pressure

The rheological properties and friction pressure losses of several fluids that are most commonly used as well drilling, completion, and stimulation fluids have been investigated experimentally. These fluids include polymeric fluids – Xanthan gum, partially hydrolyzed polyacrylamide (PHPA), guar gum, and hydroxyethyl cellulose (HEC), bentonite drilling mud, oil-based drilling mud, and guar-based fracturing slurries. Rheological measurements using a Bohlin CS 50 rheometer and a model 35 Fann viscometer showed that these fluids exhibit shear thinning and thermal thinning behavior except the bentonite drilling mud whose viscosity increased as the temperature was raised. Flow experiments using a full-scale coiled tubing test facility showed that the friction pressure loss in coiled tubing is significantly higher than in straight tubing. Since the polymeric fluids displayed drag reducing property, their drag reduction behavior in straight and coiled tubings was analyzed and compared. It was found that the drag reduction (DR) in coiled tubing is much lower than that in straight tubing. Plots of drag reduction vs. generalized Reynolds number indicate that the drag reduction in coiled tubing was not affected by polymer concentration as much as in straight tubing. The onsets of turbulence and drag reduction in coiled tubing were significantly delayed as compared with straight tubing. The effect of solids content on the friction pressure losses in coiled tubing is also briefly discussed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document