Artworks Created by Artificial Intelligence(AI) and Copyrightability by Copyright Law

2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 151-192
Author(s):  
Hyun-sook Choi ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 85
Author(s):  
Javier Díaz-Noci

Automated news, or artificial intelligence systems (AIS)-aided production of news items, has been developed from 2010 onwards. It comprises a variety of practices in which the use of data, software and human intervention is involved in diverse degrees. This can affect the application of intellectual property and copyright law in many ways. Using comparative legal methods, we examine the implications of them for some legal categories, such as authorship (and hence required originality) and types of works, namely collaborative, derivative and, most especially, collective works. Sui generis and neighboring rights are also considered for examination as being appliable to AIS-aided news outputs. Our main conclusion is that the economics intellectual property rights are guaranteed in any case through collective works. We propose a shorter term of duration before entering public domain. Still, there is a place for more authorial, personal rights. It shows, however, more difficulty when coming to moral rights, especially in Common Law countries.


Author(s):  
J. T. Iskakova ◽  
S. Y. Kashkin

This article examines the development of artificial intelligence in terms of its impact on the sphere of human activity, in particular, issues arising in connection with the copyright to works created as a result of close interaction between artificial intelligence and human. It also presents cases of occurrence of these problems and basic approaches to their solution from a legal point of view.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Linke

"Artificial Intelligence“ (AI) is experiencing a boom which has undoubtedly impacted copyright law. “AI“-generated works such as “The Next Rembrandt" raise the question whether, against the conventional anthropocentric focus of copyright law, such works are eligible for protection de lege lata. Moreover, the question regarding the protectability of “AI“ has not yet been answered conclusively. Taking an interdisciplinary approach, this thesis examines these questions as well as how creative “AI“ is and what is understood by “AI“. This thesis also considers options for action and the need for adaptation whilst offering a comparative analysis by examining the legal situation in the UK and the US.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document