scholarly journals Sequence stratigraphy, biostratigraphy and paleontology of the Maastrichtian-Paleocene Aruma Formation in outcrop in Saudi Arabia

GeoArabia ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 699-718 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean M. Philip ◽  
Jack Roger ◽  
Denis Vaslet ◽  
Fabrizio Cecca ◽  
Silvia Gardin ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT The Aruma Formation is a predominantly carbonate lithostratigraphic unit of Late Cretaceous age that crops out in Saudi Arabia. It consists of three members: from base to top they are Khanasir Limestone Member, Hajajah Limestone Member, and Lina Shale Member. In order to establish a stratigraphic revision of the Formation, a reference section near Al Kharj, southeast of Riyadh in central Saudi Arabia, was logged and a hierarchical organization of the depositional sequences established. The Aruma corresponds to four third-order cycles bounded by erosional unconformities. Integrated biostratigraphical data mainly based on ammonites, nannoflora, rudists, and larger foraminifera point to a Maastrichtian age for the Khanasir and Hajajah members, and a Paleocene age for the Lina Member. Regional stratigraphic correlations were established within the outcropping Aruma Formation in Saudi Arabia. Biostratigraphy and sequence stratigraphy allowed a correlation framework to be proposed between the Aruma and the Qahlah and Simsima formations of the United Arab Emirates and the Oman Mountains, and with the Sharwayn Formation of the Hadramawt and Dhofar. The high-resolution stratigraphic scheme established for the Aruma Formation in Saudi Arabia is expected to be useful for subsurface correlations and in petroleum exploration.

GeoArabia ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 111-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liesbeth Breesch ◽  
Rudy Swennen ◽  
Ben Dewever ◽  
François Roure ◽  
Benoit Vincent

ABSTRACT The diagenesis and fluid system evolution of outcrop analogues of potential sub-thrust Cretaceous carbonate reservoirs in the Musandam Peninsula, northern United Arab Emirates, is reconstructed during the successive stages of the Oman Mountains development. Detailed petrographic and geochemical analyses were carried out on fracture cements in limestones and dolomites mostly situated close to the main faults, which were the locations of major fluid fluxes. The main result of this study is a generalised paragenesis subdivided into four diagenetic time periods. Based on analyses of syn-tectonic veins and dolomites a large-scale fluid system is inferred with migration of hot brines with H2O-NaCl-CaCl2 composition along Cenozoic reverse faults. These brines were sourced from deeper formations or even from the basal decollement and infiltrated in the footwall. These results are compared with similar studies, which were carried out in other regions worldwide. Furthermore some implications for reservoir characteristics and hydrocarbon scenarios could be postulated. It must be noted that the majority of the analysed rocks do not have sufficiently high porosities to be regarded as reservoir rocks. However, some diagenetic processes that can improve the reservoir quality were observed. For example dolomite recrystallisation occurred in patches at the carbonate platform border, which created poorly connected reservoirs. Other possible exploration targets could be the footwall blocks of the Cenozoic reverse fault zones. When the migration of hot brines along these faults and into the footwall would be combined with petroleum migration, the footwall block could act as a potential hycrocarbon trap sealed by the fault. The fluid system evolution is incorporated in a schematic model of the geodynamic framework of the region in order to summarise the different diagenetic and fluid events, which took place during the northern Oman Mountains evolution up to now.


GeoArabia ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 53-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Moujahed Al-Husseini ◽  
Robley K. Matthews

ABSTRACT The Devonian Jauf Formation (Huj Group) froms part of a regional transgressive-regressive depositional sequence that extends more than 1,500 km across the Arabian Platform from the Al Jawf outcrops in northwest Saudi Arabia, to the subsurface of eastern Saudi Arabia and Oman (Misfar Group). The formation ranges in thickness from 200–335 m in eastern Saudi Arabia to about 300–330 m in northwest Saudi Arabia. It disconformably (?unconformably) overlies the continental to shallow-marine Tawil Formation, and is unconformably overlain by the continental Jubah Formation. The Jauf Formation consists of five members that are apparently conformable; from base-up: Sha’iba Shale, Qasr Limestone, Subbat Shale, Hammamiyat Limestone and Murayr. In the Al-Qalibah reference section, it is divided into 21 informal units. The Early Devonian Emsian Hammamiyat Member represents the main marine flooding event; it consists of Hammamiyat units 1–6 each characterized by a clastic section that is capped by limestone. The Jauf Formation is interpreted as an orbital second-order depositional sequence (denoted DS2 28), which is bounded by two second-order sequence boundaries: SB2 28 = Jauf/Tawil (c. 407.6 Ma) and SB2 27 = Jubah/Jauf (c. 393.0 Ma). The Jauf Formation appears to consist of six third-order depositional sequences (DS3 28.1 to 28.6) that were deposited in the Early Devonian, ?Pragian and Emsian stages The Hammamiyat Member (DS3 28.4) is interpreted to consist of six fourth-order orbital cycles (DS4 28.4.1 to 28.4.6) each deposited in 0.405 million years.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mazin Bashri ◽  
Osman Abdullatif ◽  
Moaz Salih ◽  
Michael Kaminski ◽  
Lamidi Babalola ◽  
...  

<p>Sequence stratigraphy of the mixed siliciclastic-carbonate successions is considered to be more complex than their counterparts of pure siliciclastic or carbonate systems. This is due to the higher number of controlling factors in the depositional environment. Consequently, the reservoir and source rock characterization within these systems is relatively more difficult in term of the spatial distribution of the lithologic unit and its petrophysical properties heterogeneity.</p><p>Following Scharland et al., 2001, the Miocene Dam Formation is regarded as a third-order sequence which consists of both siliciclastic and carbonate sediments, with the dominance of carbonates. Three fourth-order sequences are well exposed in the Lidam area, Eastern Saudi Arabia. Sequence boundaries are delineated using the existing Rhizolith and desiccation cracks in the most upper part of the high stand systems tract, where it is dominated by shallow marine carbonate deposits. The early low stand systems tract is of dolomitic mudstone interbedded with dissolved chicken-wire anhydrite. Fine sandstone of estuarine origin, in addition to intertidal mudstone-sandstone succession, represent the late low stand systems tract. Transgressive surfaces are either sharp erosional surfaces or ravinement surfaces with intraformational lag deposits. Subtidal quartz skeletal wackestone with pieces of evidence of storm events represent the transgressive systems tract. Going toward the end of the vertical succession of the Dam Formation, shallow marine siliciclastics dominate. A set of incised channels filled with intraformational boulders of calcareous sandstone lies over the shallow marine siliciclastics succession, indicating a great drop in the sea level. Finally, a fluvial system of high energy braided stream origin, composed of medium to coarse ferruginous sandstone within a fining upward succession and high abundance of plant remains, represent the Hufouf Formation base and the start of a new third-order sequence. The heterogeneity of the lithofacies is intense, but the sequence stratigraphic framework helps in their rearrangement vertically into packages, which helps in the prediction of their spatial distribution.   </p><p> </p><p> </p>


2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-60
Author(s):  
Miftahul Huda

The reality of the difference in applying Islamic law in the context of marriage law legislation in modern Muslim countries is undeniable. Tunisia and Turkey, for example, have practiced Islamic law of liberal nuance. Unlike the case with Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates that still use the application of Islamic law as it is in their fiqh books. In between these two currents many countries are trying to apply the law in their own countries by trying to bridge the urgent new needs and local wisdom. This is widely embraced by modern Muslim countries in general. This paper reviews typologically the heterogeneousness of family law legislation of modern Muslim countries while responding to modernization issues. Typical buildings seen from modern family law reforms can be classified into four types. The first type is progressive, pluralistic and extradoctrinal reform, such as in Turkey and Tunisia. The second type is adaptive, unified and intradoctrinal reform, as in Indonesia, Malaysia, Morocco, Algeria and Pakistan. The third type is adaptive, unified and intradoctrinal reform, represented by Iraq. While the fourth type is progressive, unifiied and extradoctrinal reform, which can be represented by Somalia and Algeria.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Faheem ◽  
Mohamed Azali ◽  
Lee Chin ◽  
Nur Syazwani Mazlan

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document