Les lahars; depots, origines et dynamique

2000 ◽  
Vol 171 (5) ◽  
pp. 545-557 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank Lavigne ◽  
Jean-Claude Thouret

Abstract A lahar is a flowing mixture of rock debris and water (other than normal streamflow) from a volcano, which encompasses a continuum from debris flows (sediment concentration > or =60% per volume) to hyperconcentrated streamflows (sediment concentration from 20 to 60% per volume). Debris flow deposits are poorly sorted and massive with abundant clasts. Lahars can be either syn-eruptive, post-eruptive or have a non-eruptive origin. Four types of lahars can be generated during an eruption, based on distinct sources of water (i.e. ice, snow, crater lake, river, and rain) that allow the sediments to be removed and incorporated in the lahar (e.g., Mount St.-Helens in 1980, Nevado del Ruiz in 1985). Post-eruptive lahars, which are rain-triggered, occur during several years after an eruption (e.g., still occurring at Pinatubo). Non-eruptive lahars are flows generated on volcanoes without eruptive activity, particularly in the case of a debris avalanche or a lake outburst (e.g., Kelud or Ruapehu). Lahars flow as pulses, whose velocity and discharge are much higher than those of streamflows, including catchments similar in size. Sediment transport capacity of lahars is exceptional, owing to buoyancy, dispersive pressure, and to the amount of cohesive clay and silt. However, the finding of recent experimental works indicates that even clay-rich lahar mixtures have little true cohesion. Therefore, the typical classification of lahars into "cohesive" and "non cohesive" seems to be inappropriate at present. Besides, past work on lahar mechanics used models based on the Bagnold's or the Bingham's theories. Recent advances in experimentation show that a lahar has specific rheological properties: it moves as a surge or series of surges, driven by gravity, by porosity fluctuation, and by pore fluid pressures, in accordance with the Coulomb grain flow model. Grain size distribution and sorting control pore pressure distribution. Lahar mechanics depend on much more than steady-state rheology, because lahars are highly unsteady and typically heterogeneous flows. Lahar can show a succession of debris flow phases, hyperconcentrated flow phases, and sometimes transient streamflow phases. Therefore, some fluids-mechanics concepts and terminology, such as "viscous", "laminar" or "non-Newtonian" are inappropriate to describe the mechanical properties of lahars. Processes of deposition are complex and poorly known. Interpretation of massive and unsorted lahar deposits commonly ascribe the deposition regime to a freezing en masse process. However, recent laboratory experiments highlight that debris-flow deposits may result from incremental deposition processes.

2013 ◽  
pp. 301-307 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chiara Deangeli ◽  
Erika Paltrinieri ◽  
Davide Tiranti
Keyword(s):  

2010 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 535-545 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. M. Hsu ◽  
L. B. Chiou ◽  
G. F. Lin ◽  
C. H. Chao ◽  
H. Y. Wen ◽  
...  

Abstract. Debris flows pose severe hazards to communities in mountainous areas, often resulting in the loss of life and property. Helping debris-flow-prone communities delineate potential hazard zones provides local authorities with useful information for developing emergency plans and disaster management policies. In 2003, the Soil and Water Conservation Bureau of Taiwan proposed an empirical model to delineate hazard zones for all creeks (1420 in total) with potential of debris flows and utilized the model to help establish a hazard prevention system. However, the model does not fully consider hydrologic and physiographical conditions for a given creek in simulation. The objective of this study is to propose new approaches that can improve hazard zone delineation accuracy and simulate hazard zones in response to different rainfall intensity. In this study, a two-dimensional commercial model FLO-2D, physically based and taking into account the momentum and energy conservation of flow, was used to simulate debris-flow inundated areas. Sensitivity analysis with the model was conducted to determine the main influence parameters which affect debris flow simulation. Results indicate that the roughness coefficient, yield stress and volumetric sediment concentration dominate the computed results. To improve accuracy of the model, the study examined the performance of the rainfall-runoff model of FLO-2D as compared with that of the HSPF (Hydrological Simulation Program Fortran) model, and then the proper values of the significant parameters were evaluated through the calibration process. Results reveal that the HSPF model has a better performance than the FLO-2D model at peak flow and flow recession period, and the volumetric sediment concentration and yield stress can be estimated by the channel slope. The validation of the model for simulating debris-flow hazard zones has been confirmed by a comparison of field evidence from historical debris-flow disaster data. The model can successfully replicate the influence zone of the debris-flow disaster event with an acceptable error and demonstrate a better result than the empirical model adopted by the Soil and Water Conservation Bureau of Taiwan.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 171-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhen-Kun Lin ◽  
Ai-Jun Wang ◽  
Xiang Ye

Understanding the erosion–deposition process of sediments and the associated controlling mechanisms in subaqueous deltas is important for coastal environment protection. In this study, field observations and numerical simulations were performed for the Nanliu River subaqueous delta in Guangxi Province (Southern China) to investigate the sediment dynamic processes at the bottom boundary layer. The results show that the sediment resuspension mainly occurs during periods of spring tides and is mainly controlled by the wave action. When the seabed is free from erosion, suspended sediment settling caused by lateral transport is an important source of maintaining near bed suspended sediment concentration. It was also found that increasing the shear parameter could facilitate the formation of flocs, after which the small flocs tend to merge to large flocs. Finally, by performing a consistency analysis between the seabed erosion and deposition processes obtained from numerical simulation, and the changes of seabed level recorded by the equipment during the field observation, we determined that the local erosion coefficient was 5 × 10−5 kg/m2·s. The one-dimensional simulation is also capable of revealing the general trend at the seabed where it is first subjected to erosion and then deposition, as indicated during the field measurements.


2001 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 221-238 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oldrich Hungr ◽  
S. G. Evans ◽  
M. J. Bovis ◽  
J. N. Hutchinson

Abstract As a result of the widespread use of the landslide classifications of Varnes (1978), and Hutchinson (1988), certain terms describing common types of flow-like mass movements have become entrenched in the language of engineering geology. Example terms include debris flow, debris avalanche and mudslide. Here, more precise definitions of the terms are proposed, which would allow the terms to be retained with their original meanings while making their application less ambiguous. A new division of landslide materials is proposed, based on genetic and morphological aspects rather than arbitrary grain-size limits. The basic material groups include sorted materials: gravel, sand, silt, and clay, unsorted materials: debris, earth and mud, peat and rock. Definitions are proposed for relatively slow non-liquefied sand or gravel flows, extremely rapid sand, silt or debris flow slides accompanied by liquefaction, clay flow slides involving extra-sensitive clays, peat flows, slow to rapid earth flows in nonsensitive plastic clays, debris flows which occur in steep established channels or gullies, mud flows considered as cohesive debris flows, debris floods involving massive sediment transport at limited discharges, debris avalanches which occur on open hill slopes and rock avalanches formed by large scale failures of bedrock.


2012 ◽  
Vol 594-597 ◽  
pp. 2318-2322
Author(s):  
Li Qun Lv ◽  
Ning Sheng Chen ◽  
Yang Lu ◽  
Qi Huang ◽  
Jun Li ◽  
...  

Xinjiang arid area is characterized by low rainfall, strong evaporation capacity, sparse vegetation, intensive tectonic movement, and fragile ecological environment ; the rainfall-type debris flow in the arid area are obviously different from the same type debris flow in humid and subhumid area of China with conditions of rainfall excitation, watershed morphology, motion and deposition processes, material composition, active period and disaster mechanism. Investigations and analyses of characteristics of rainfall-type debris flow in the arid area will reveal the rule of the occurrence and development and explore the evolution trends, to establish reasonable disaster reduction measures. Qiaoquli gully located in Kashgar is a typical arid area rainfall debris flow gully. The 50-year frequency outbreak of debris flow in 2005 destroyed chinapakistan highway . Further investigation to this debris flow gully will contribute to our understanding of this kind of debris flow disaster characteristics and mechanism.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document