scholarly journals Analysis of Surgical Results According to the Number of Fused Levels in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Retrospective Study

The Nerve ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 32-37
Author(s):  
Bum-Suk Yu ◽  
Farid Yudoyono ◽  
Seong Yi ◽  
Yoon Ha ◽  
Keung Nyun Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Anterior Cervical Discectomy ◽  
Surgical Results ◽  
Cervical Discectomy

scholarly journals Risk factor analysis of axial symptoms after single-segment anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: A retrospective study of 113 patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (12) ◽  
pp. 6100-6108
Author(s):  
Lin-Feng Wang ◽  
Zhen Dong ◽  
De-Chao Miao ◽  
Yong Shen ◽  
Feng Wang
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factor ◽  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Japanese Orthopaedic Association ◽  
Anterior Cervical Discectomy ◽  
Occurrence Rate ◽  
Adjacent Segment ◽  
Disc Space ◽  
Cervical Discectomy ◽  
Single Segment ◽  
Axial Symptoms

Objective This retrospective study was performed to investigate the risk factors for axial symptoms (AS) after single-segment anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Methods One hundred thirteen patients with cervical spondylosis who had undergone single-segment ACDF from January 2012 to December 2015 were divided into those with and without AS (n = 34 and n = 79, respectively). Clinical data and radiological evaluation results were recorded. Results The occurrence rate of AS was 30.1% (34/113), and the average visual analog scale score was 4.5 points. Bony fusion was achieved in all cases during follow-up. There were no differences in age, sex, disease duration, diagnostic categories, operative segment, Japanese Orthopaedic Association score, or adjacent segment degeneration. However, cervical range of motion (CROM), cervical curvature, and disc space enlargement significantly differed between the groups. Logistic regression analysis revealed that CROM, cervical curvature, and disc space enlargement were independently associated with AS. Conclusions AS after single-segment ACDF is not rare. Disc space enlargement is a risk factor for AS, while higher CROM and lordotic cervical curvature are protective factors. Excessive or insufficient disc space enlargement could increase the incidence of AS. Maintaining CROM within the normal range and restoring cervical lordosis might help to prevent AS.

SURGICAL RESULTS IN ANTERIOR CERVICAL DISCECTOMY AND FUSION USING A COUNTERSUNK INTERLOCKING AUTOGENOUS ILIAC BONE GRAFT

Orthopedics ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 15 (8) ◽  
pp. 923-925
Author(s):  
David N Bosacco ◽  
Arnold T Berman ◽  
Richard J Levenberg ◽  
Stephen J Bosacco
Keyword(s):  
Bone Graft ◽  
Iliac Bone ◽  
Anterior Cervical Discectomy ◽  
Surgical Results ◽  
Cervical Discectomy ◽  
Iliac Bone Graft

scholarly journals Surgical Results of Cervical Radiculopathy: Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion versus Posterior Microendoscopic Foraminotomy

2010 ◽  
Vol 59 (4) ◽  
pp. 761-763
Author(s):  
Fumito Tanabe ◽  
Eiji Taketomi ◽  
Kosei Ijiri ◽  
Takuya Yamamoto ◽  
Ryusaku Nagayoshi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Radiculopathy ◽  
Anterior Cervical Discectomy ◽  
Surgical Results ◽  
Cervical Discectomy

scholarly journals Is the fusion order of the cranial and caudal levels different in two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for cervical spondylopathy? A retrospective study

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xia-Qing Sheng ◽  
Yang Meng ◽  
Hao Liu ◽  
Bei-Yu Wang ◽  
Yi Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Fusion Rate ◽  
Anterior Cervical Discectomy ◽  
Adjacent Segment ◽  
Cervical Discectomy ◽  
Cervical Spondylopathy

Abstract Study design Retrospective study. Objective This study aimed to compare the fusion order between the cranial and caudal levels in two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with a zero-profile device in the treatment of cervical spondylopathy. Summary of background data Fusion is the standard used to judge the success of ACDF. However, the fusion order in two-level ACDF remains uncertain. The mechanical environment of different levels is different, which may affect the fusion rate or fusion order. Methods From 2014 to January 2019, data of consecutive patients with two-level cervical disk degenerative disease who underwent ACDF were retrospectively reviewed. Radiological assessments were based on the range of motion of the fusion level, segment slope, and disk height, and complications were assessed. Data were analyzed using the paired t, Mann-Whitney U, χ2, Fisher exact, and rank-sum tests and logistic regression analysis. Results In total, 118 patients were ultimately enrolled for analysis in the study. The respective fusion rates of the cranial and caudal levels were 26.27% and 10.17% (p < 0.05) at 3 months, 58.47% and 42.37% (p < 0.05) at 6 months, 86.44% and 82.20% (1 0.05) at 1 year, and 92.37% and 89.83% (p > 0.05) at the last follow-up. Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that the preoperative segmental slope and cranial level were independent risk factors for non-fusion. The adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) and subsidence rates were comparable between the two levels. Conclusion The caudal level had a slower fusion process than the cranial level. A higher preoperative segment slope was a risk factor for fusion. However, the subsidence and ASD rate were comparable between the caudal and cranial levels in the two-level ACDF.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document