VOLUMINOUS SHALLOW-WATER TO EMERGENT PHREATOMAGMATIC BASALTIC VOLCANICLASTIC ROCKS, PROTEROZOIC (~1886 MA) AMISK LAKE COMPOSITE VOLCANO, FLIN FLON GREENSTONE BELT, CANADA

1991 ◽  
pp. 175-187 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. D. AYRES ◽  
N. A. VAN WAGONER ◽  
W. S. FERREIRA
2009 ◽  
Vol 46 (7) ◽  
pp. 481-508 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. M. DeWolfe ◽  
H. L. Gibson ◽  
B. Lafrance ◽  
A. H. Bailes

The hanging wall to the Flin Flon, Callinan, and Triple 7 volcanogenic massive sulphide deposits of the Flin Flon district is composed of the Hidden and Louis formations. The contact between these formations is marked by mafic tuff that represents a hiatus in effusive volcanism. The formations form a composite volcanic edifice that was erupted and grew within a large, volcanic–tectonic subsidence structure (hosting the deposits) that developed within a rifted-arc environment. The formations are evidence of resurgent effusive volcanism and subsidence following a hiatus in volcanism marked by ore formation since they consist of dominantly basaltic flows, sills, and volcaniclastic rocks with subordinate basaltic andesite and rhyodacitic flows and volcaniclastic rocks. The Hidden formation is interpreted to represent a small shield volcano and the Louis formation a separate shield volcano that developed on its flank. Both the Hidden and Louis volcanic edifices were constructed by continuous, low-volume eruptions of pillow lava. A gradual change from a dominantly extensional environment during the formation of the footwall Flin Flon formation to a progressively more dominant convergent environment during the emplacement of the hanging wall suggests that the Hidden and Louis formations are unlikely to host significant volcanogenic massive sulphide-type mineralization. However, synvolcanic structures in the formations define structural corridors that project downwards into the footwall where they encompass massive sulphide mineralization, indicating their control on ore formation, longevity,and reactivation as magma and fluid pathways during the growth of the Hidden and Louis volcanoes.


1999 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 209-225 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ralf O Maxeiner ◽  
Tom II Sibbald ◽  
William L Slimmon ◽  
Larry M Heaman ◽  
Brian R Watters

This paper describes the geology, geochemistry, and age of two amphibolite facies volcano-plutonic assemblages in the southern Hanson Lake Block and southeastern Glennie Domain of the Paleoproterozoic Trans-Hudson Orogen of east-central Saskatchewan. The Hanson Lake assemblage comprises a mixed suite of subaqueous to subaerial dacitic to rhyolitic (ca. 1875 Ma) and intercalated minor mafic volcanic rocks, overlain by greywackes. Similarly with modern oceanic island arcs, the Hanson Lake assemblage shows evolution from primitive arc tholeiites to evolved calc-alkaline arc rocks. It is intruded by younger subvolcanic alkaline porphyries (ca. 1861 Ma), synvolcanic granitic plutons (ca. 1873 Ma), and the younger Hanson Lake Pluton (ca. 1844 Ma). Rocks of the Northern Lights assemblage are stratigraphically equivalent to the lower portion of the Hanson Lake assemblage and comprise tholeiitic arc pillowed mafic flows and felsic to intermediate volcaniclastic rocks and greywackes, which can be traced as far west as Wapawekka Lake in the south-central part of the Glennie Domain. The Hanson Lake volcanic belt, comprising the Northern Lights and Hanson Lake assemblages, shows strong lithological, geochemical, and geochronological similarities to lithotectonic assemblages of the Flin Flon Domain (Amisk Collage), suggesting that all of these areas may have been part of a more or less continuous island arc complex, extending from Snow Lake to Flin Flon, across the Sturgeon-Weir shear zone into the Hanson Lake Block and across the Tabbernor fault zone into the Glennie Domain.


1975 ◽  
Vol 12 (8) ◽  
pp. 1272-1290 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. K. Park

The Flin Flon – Snow Lake greenstone belt is of Archean or Aphebian age and has been metamorphosed to greenschist or low amphibolite facies during the Hudsonian orogeny. It contains four rock units — the Amisk Group, the Missi Group, metadiorite and metagabbro bodies, and the Boundary Intrusions. The rocks contain two main magnetizations, an early B magnetization and a later A magnetization. Both magnetizations contain reversals. The A magnetization (43 sites, direction 168°, +73°, k = 17, α95 = 5°, pole 24°N, 095°W) is found in all rock units. It can be divided into three parts (1, 2 and 3) which have the same general direction, but which are significantly different from one another. It is suggested that A1 is a viscous partial thermoremanence (vptrm), and A2 possibly a chemical remanence (crm). Both are considered to have been acquired during uplift (1600–1700 m.y.) following the Hudsonian orogeny. A3 is possibly a crm acquired during late fault movements and appears to be carried by hematite developed during retrograde metamorphism. A3 is considered to be about 1600 m.y. old. The B magnetization (7 sites, 129°, +04°, k = 12, α95 = 18°, pole 20°S, 046°W) occurs in all rock units except the Missi. It is particularly well developed in the Boundary Intrusions where it is considered to be a primary thermoremanent magnetization (trm). In other rock units B is considered to be a vptrm acquired during heating at the time of emplacement of the Boundary Intrusions. The B magnetization is considered to be about 1800 m.y. old. Some enigmatic magnetizations with very high blocking temperatures above 700 °C were observed. Formulas for calculating the coercivities in rocks with more than one magnetization are given.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document