In Displaced Distal Tibial Fractures, Intramedullary Nail and Locking Plate Fixation Did Not Differ in Terms of 6-Month Disability

2018 ◽  
Vol 100 (16) ◽  
pp. 1435
Author(s):  
Michael J. Gardner
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dejan Blažević ◽  
Janoš Kodvanj ◽  
Petra Adamović ◽  
Dinko Vidović ◽  
Zlatko Trobonjača ◽  
...  

Abstract BackgroundGood clinical outcomes for locking plates as an external fixator to treat tibial fractures have been reported. However, external locking plate fixation is still generally rarely performed. This study aimed to compare the stability of external locking plate fixator with that of conventional external fixator for extraarticular proximal tibial fractures, using finite element analysis. MethodsThree models were constructed: (1) external locking plating of proximal tibial fracture with lateral proximal tibial locking plate and 5-mm screws (ELP), (2) conventional external fixation of proximal tibial fracture with an 11-mm rod and 5-mm Schanz screws (EF-11), and (3) conventional external fixation of proximal tibial fracture with a 7-mm rod and 5-mm Schanz screws (EF-7). The stress distribution, displacement at the fracture gap, and stiffness of the three finite element models at 30-, 40-, 50-, and 60-mm plate–rod offset from the lateral surface of the lateral condyle of the tibia were determined. ResultsThe conventional external fixator showed higher stiffness than did the external locking plate fixator. In all models, the stiffness decreased as the distance of the plate–rod from the bone surface increased. The maximum stiffness was 121.06 N/mm in the EF-11 model with 30-mm tibia–rod offset. In the EF-7 model group, the maximum stiffness was 40.00 N/mm in the model with 30-mm tibia–rod offset. In the ELP model group, the maximum stiffness was 35.79 N/mm in the model with 30-mm tibia–plate offsetConclusionsExternal locking plate fixation is more flexible than conventional external fixation, which can influence secondary bone healing. External locking plate fixation requires the placement of the plate as close as possible to the skin, which allow low-profile design, because the increased distance of the plate from bone can be too flexible for bone healing.


2009 ◽  
Vol 58 (4) ◽  
pp. 604-608 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katsuhiko Ishibashi ◽  
Gentaro Hanaishi ◽  
Kenichiro Nakai ◽  
Masato Nagashima ◽  
Hiroaki Tanaka

2009 ◽  
Vol 34 (8) ◽  
pp. 1285-1290 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rakesh K. Gupta ◽  
Rajesh Kumar Rohilla ◽  
Kapil Sangwan ◽  
Vijendra Singh ◽  
Saurav Walia

2020 ◽  
pp. 145749692095783
Author(s):  
E. Ekman ◽  
K. Lehtimäki ◽  
J. Syvänen ◽  
M. Saltychev

Background and Aims: To evaluate evidence on the superiority of plate fixation over intramedullary nail fixation in the treatment of distal tibial fractures regarding functional outcomes and complication rates. Material and Methods: Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched in December 2019. The risk of systematic bias was assessed according to the Cochrane Collaboration’s domain-based evaluation framework. Results: The search resulted in 514 records, the final sample included 10 randomized controlled trials (782 patients). There were statistically significant differences in operating time (−11.2, 95% confidence interval: −16.3 to −6.1 min), time to partial weight bearing (−0.96, 95% confidence interval: −1.8 to −0.1 weeks), time to full weight bearing (−2.2, 95% confidence interval: −4.32 to −0.01 weeks), the rates of deep infections (risk ratio = 0.37, 95% confidence interval: 0.19 to 0.69), and the rates of soft-tissue complications (risk ratio = 0.52, 95% confidence interval: 0.33 to 0.82) favoring intramedullary nail. Intraoperative blood loss (127.2, 95% confidence interval: 34.7 to 219.7 mL) and postoperative knee pain and stiffness (relative risk = 5.6, 95% confidence interval: 1.4–22.6) showed significant differences favoring plate fixation. When combining all complication rates, the difference was risk ratio = 0.77 (95% confidence interval: 0.63 to 0.95) favoring intramedullary nail. No significant differences in radiation time, length of incision, length of hospital stay, time to return to work, time to union, the rates of healing complications or secondary procedures, ankle pain or stiffness, or functional scores were found. Conclusion: This meta-analysis suggests that intramedullary nail might be slightly superior in reducing postoperative complications and result in slightly faster healing when compared to plate fixation.


JAMA ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 318 (18) ◽  
pp. 1767 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew L. Costa ◽  
Juul Achten ◽  
James Griffin ◽  
Stavros Petrou ◽  
Ian Pallister ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document