scholarly journals Anchor Institutions: Best Practices to Address Social Needs and Social Determinants of Health

2020 ◽  
Vol 110 (3) ◽  
pp. 309-316
Author(s):  
Howard K. Koh ◽  
Amy Bantham ◽  
Alan C. Geller ◽  
Mark A. Rukavina ◽  
Karen M. Emmons ◽  
...  

“Anchor Institutions”—universities, hospitals, and other large, place-based organizations—invest in their communities as a way of doing business. Anchor “meds” (anchor institutions dedicated to health) that address social needs and social determinants of health have generated considerable community-based activity over the past several decades. Yet to date, virtually no research has analyzed their current status or effect on community health. To assess the current state and potential best practices of anchor meds, we conducted a search of the literature, a review of Web sites and related public documents of all declared anchor meds in the country, and interviews with 14 key informants. We identified potential best practices in adopting, operationalizing, and implementing an anchor mission and using specific social determinants of health strategies, noting early outcomes and lessons learned. Future dedicated research can bring heightened attention to this emerging force for community health.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tara Herrera ◽  
Kevin P Fiori ◽  
Heather Archer-Dyer ◽  
David W. Lounsbury ◽  
Judith Wylie-Rosett

BACKGROUND Background: Inclusion of social determinants of health is mandated for undergraduate medical education. However, little is known about how prepare pre-clinical students for “real world” screening and referrals to address social determinants of health. OBJECTIVE The pilot project objective was to evaluate the feasibility of using “real world” service-based learning approach in training pre-clinical students to assess social needs and make relevant referrals via the electronic medical record during in COVID-19 pandemic (May-June 2020). METHODS This project was designed to address an acute community service need and to teach pre-clinical second-year medical student (n=11) volunteers how to assess social needs and make referrals using the 10-item Social Determinants of Screening Questionnaire in the electronic health record (epic platform). Third-year medical student volunteers (n= 3), who had completed six clinical rotations, led the one-day skills development orientation and were available for on-going mentoring and peer support. All student-patient communication was by telephone, and bi-lingual (English/Spanish) students called the patients, who preferred to communicate in Spanish. We analyzed EHR data extracted from epic to evaluate screening and data extracted from REDCap to evaluate community health worker notes. We elicited feedback from the participating pre-clinical students to evaluate the future use of this community-based service-learning approach in our pre-clinical curriculum. RESULTS The pre-clinical students completed 45 screening interviews; 20 patients (44%) screened positive for at least one social need. Almost all (19/20) were referred to the community health worker. Half (8/16) patients, who had community health worker consultation, were connected with a relevant social service resource. The pre-clinical students indicated that project participation increased their ability to assess social needs and to make needed electronic health record referrals. Food insecurity was the most common social needs. CONCLUSIONS Practical exposure to social needs assessment has the potential to develop pre-clinical medical students’ ability to address social concerns prior to entering clinical clerkships in their third year of medical school. The students can also become familiar with the EHR prior to entering third year clerkships. Physicians, who are aware of social needs and have EMR tools and staff resources to act, can create workflows to make social needs assessment and services integral components of health care. Research studies and quality improvement initiatives need to investigate how to integrate screening for social needs and connecting patients to the appropriate social services into routine primary care procedures. CLINICALTRIAL not a clinical trial


Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 141 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Reyes ◽  
Rabih Dahdouh ◽  
Precious Akanyirige ◽  
Araceli Estrada ◽  
Maria R Young ◽  
...  

Introduction: Consistent evidence has shown that the social determinants of health (SDoH) play an important role in shaping overall health. As health systems become more focused on improving the health of populations, there is an urgent need for interventions that address upstream factors such as the social determinants of health. Such interventions have not been widely studied and even less work exists in the realm of maternal health. But as maternal and infant mortality remain critical issues, there is great opportunity for the study and development of interventions to address social needs in pregnancy care. Hypothesis: We assessed the hypothesis that most existing interventions addressing the social needs of pregnant women would focus only on identifying social risks, while fewer would connect patients with resources in the community. We expected that most studies would not provide evaluations of effectiveness. Methods: We conducted a database search of MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science to capture literature published between January 1970 and April 2019. A team of reviewers screened titles and abstracts for interventions that were issued in a clinical setting and addressed at least one SDoH as defined by the World Health Organization. Results: Preliminary results revealed 25 studies. All consisted of some form of risk screening and four included a referral process. Interventions addressing intimate partner violence were most numerous followed by psychosocial factors and cigarette smoking. Financial needs were assessed in one study. Eight studies included an evaluation process. Staff carrying out the interventions were primarily research staff, nurse practitioners or nurse midwives. Conclusions: In conclusion, more must be done to connect pregnant women with social resources. As unmet social needs put women at higher risk for poor outcomes in pregnancy, action should be taken to more seamlessly integrate social needs interventions into clinical workflows. Focus should expand beyond traditional social risk screening to capture a wider range of needs including financial stability, housing, and transportation. These are particularly important during pregnancy because adequate prenatal care requires women to be more engaged with the health care system than they would to maintain baseline health.


2020 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew W. Kreuter ◽  
Tess Thompson ◽  
Amy McQueen ◽  
Rachel Garg

There has been an explosion of interest in addressing social needs in health care settings. Some efforts, such as screening patients for social needs and connecting them to needed social services, are already in widespread practice. These and other major investments from the health care sector hint at the potential for new multisector collaborations to address social determinants of health and individual social needs. This article discusses the rapidly growing body of research describing the links between social needs and health and the impact of social needs interventions on health improvement, utilization, and costs. We also identify gaps in the knowledge base and implementation challenges to be overcome. We conclude that complementary partnerships among the health care, public health, and social services sectors can build on current momentum to strengthen social safety net policies, modernize social services, and reshape resource allocation to address social determinants of health. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Public Health, Volume 42 is April 2021. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.


2020 ◽  
Vol 110 (S2) ◽  
pp. S219-S221
Author(s):  
Dodi Meyer ◽  
Eva Lerner ◽  
Alex Phillips ◽  
Katarina Zumwalt

Universal screenings for social determinants of health (SDOH) are feasible at the health system level and enable institutions to identify unmet social needs that would otherwise go undiscovered. NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital implemented SDOH screenings together with clinical screenings in four outpatient primary care sites. Aligning SDOH screening with clinical screening was crucial for establishing provider buy-in and ensuring sustainability of screening for SDOH. Despite some challenges, universal screening for SDOH has allowed NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital to identify unmet needs to improve population health.


2016 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 254-258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans-Peter de Ruiter

The social determinants of health are the conditions in which humans are born, grow up, live, work, and age (World Health Organization [WHO], 2012). In nursing programs, this content is typically taught in community health courses. Another strategy for teaching students how to understand the social determinants of health is study-abroad courses. Budding nurses can learn how to assess conditions that influence the health of a community. Conducting this assessment in a culture that differs from the student’s own can help highlight what factors impact one’s own health. For the past eight years, the author has been teaching the social and cultural determinants of health to nursing students by taking them on 3-week cultural immersion/community health study-abroad programs. Destinations have included Ghana, Austria, the Netherlands, and Thailand. This article presents observations on how the teaching of social determinants of health has changed during the period 2008–2016.


2020 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara P. Laymon ◽  
Reena Chudgar ◽  
Tiffany Huang ◽  
Mukti Kulkarni ◽  
Peter L. Holtgrave ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Emily Roebuck ◽  
Brisa Urquieta de Hernandez ◽  
Mellisa Wheeler ◽  
Gillian Stearns ◽  
Manish Patel ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4943-4943
Author(s):  
Katherine EC Smith ◽  
Jessica R Cox ◽  
Rosalind L Haynes ◽  
Nicole Ivette Bohnker ◽  
Kay L Saving

Abstract Background: Transition from pediatric to adult care has been a recent focus of sickle cell programs across the country due to patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) to living longer. 1 Transition programs for other chronic conditions focus largely on patient knowledge of the disease, treatments, and appointment compliance but for patients with SCD, social determinants of health (SDOH) must also be considered when guiding patients toward adult care. 2 Historically, lack of acknowledgement of the importance of relationships and trust building when addressing SDOH has led to barriers in patient responsiveness. 3 To facilitate this aspect of transition, our recently hired Community Health Worker (CHW) developed a Community Health Transitional Questionnaire (CHTQ) and conducted a Quality Improvement (QI) project to address SDOH in a patient-centered manner during transition to adult care visits at the clinic. Aims: Refine the CHTQ by gathering the "voice of the customer" to provide a more patient-centered approach to transition to adult care for patients with SCD. Complete the CHTQ with 70% of transition-aged (12-25 years) patients by 7/1/21. Methods: The CHTQ consists of 32 questions about SDOH in 8 categories (Food, Housing, Money/Finances, Transportation, Education/Work, Family and Other Support, Stress Prior to/After COVID, and Sleep). Thirty pediatric sickle cell patients were identified as being within the established transitional age group. A series of Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles were used to refine the CHTQ. Through patient/caregiver feedback, small increments of change were used to establish a CHTQ that would improve patient care and be accepted by the patients/caregivers. PDSA #1: During regularly scheduled appointments, two patients and their caregivers met with the CHW who described the purpose of the CHTQ and then asked the patient to privately complete the CHTQ. PDSA #2: Because of feedback received from PDSA #1, the CHW allowed the next two patients to have caregivers present while answering the CHTQ, but explained that ideally the patient should be able to answer the CHTQ without input from their caregiver before transition to an adult environment. PDSA #3: Because of the feedback received from PDSA #2, the CHW accompanied the clinic RN to the exam room and worked the CHTQ into the nursing check-in questions in an informal manner making the questions seem more routine. Results: After 3 PDSA cycles, 17 additional patients/caregivers completed the CHTQ without issues or concerns. A total of 22/30 (73%) CHTQs met the goal of completion by 7/1/21. One additional CHTQ has been completed since. Using the information from the CHTQ, the team has been able to better address individualized SDOH for each patient. For example, one area of concern identified was transportation with 9/23 (39%) patients expressing concerns getting to & from appointments and/or school/work. Transportation needs were then discussed with the clinic social worker who is now working with those patients, giving them tools to arrange transportation. Conclusion For SCD patients, it appears imperative that a relationship be established prior to inquires about SDOH. Using an informal patient-centered approach with the CHTQ was more likely to gain patient trust and allowed the CHW to obtain information needed to assist the patient with SDOH issues. Once SDOH issues were identified through the CHTQ, the CHW was able to find patient-driven, individualized resources addressing those concerns. References DeBaun, M.R. & Telfair, J. (2012). Transition and Sickle Cell Disease. PEDIATRICS, 130(5), 926-935 https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2011-3049 Andermann, A. (2016). Taking action on the social determinants of health in clinical practice: a framework for health professionals. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 188(17-18), E474-E483. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.160177 Cheney, C., Pecci, A., & Porter, S (2020, May). Social Determinants of Health: Lead or Partner. HealthLeaders. https://www.healthleadersmedia.com/clinical-care/social-determinants-health-lead-or-partner-0 Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document