scholarly journals Improved overall survival following tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment in NSCLC—are we making progress?

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 373-376 ◽  
Author(s):  
Klaus Fenchel ◽  
Stephen P. Dale ◽  
Wolfram C. M. Dempke
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroyuki Iwasaki ◽  
Haruhiko Yamazaki ◽  
Nobuyasu Suganuma ◽  
Yuko Sugawara ◽  
Naoki Gotoh ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 36 (6Part24) ◽  
pp. 2761-2761
Author(s):  
R Jeraj ◽  
M Vanderhoek ◽  
U Simoncic ◽  
S Perlman ◽  
D Alberti ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7572-7572 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Faehling ◽  
Robert Eckert ◽  
Torsten G. Kamp ◽  
Sabine Kuom ◽  
Werner Spengler

7572 Background: EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) such as erlotinib lead to prolonged disease stabilization in some patients with advanced NSCLC. It is so far not clear how to treat patients who progress after prolonged response to erlotinib. TKI therapy beyond progression with added chemotherapy, radiotherapy or best supportive care (BSC) may improve survival compared to chemotherapy, radiotherapy or BSC alone. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed all NSCLC patients treated with erlotinib at our institutions since 2004 who progressed after at least stable disease on erlotinib for at least six months (n=41). Twenty-seven patients were treated with TKI beyond progression (TKI patients), of whom 24 received erlotinib and 3 afatinib. Fourteen patients did not receive further TKI treatment after progression (controls). Overall survival (OS) from progression on TKI and OS from diagnosis of lung cancer was analyzed for the whole population and case-control subpopulations of pairs matched for gender, smoking status, and histology. Results: Treatment with TKI and chemotherapy was well tolerated with no increase in grade 3 and 4 toxicities. TKI-patients had a significantly longer OS from progression on TKI (case control: median 21.0 vs. 3.0 months, HR 0.175) and longer OS from diagnosis of lung cancer (case control: median 28.5 vs. 15.3 months, HR 0.335). Conclusions: In long-term erlotinib responders, treatment with TKI beyond progression in addition to chemotherapy or radiotherapy is feasible and well tolerated with limited toxicity. TKI-treatment beyond progression improved OS compared to treatment with TKI-free chemotherapy or radiotherapy.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Kousuke Watanabe ◽  
Hidenori Kage ◽  
Saki Nagoshi ◽  
Kazuhiro Toyama ◽  
Yoshiyuki Ohno ◽  
...  

Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) combination is expected to increase in the era of precision medicine. TKI combination may be required to treat double primary cancers, each having a targetable gene, or to treat a single malignancy with multiple targetable genes. Here, we demonstrate the first report of dual EGFR and ABL TKI treatment in a patient with concomitant EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma and BCR-ABL1-positive chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). A 60-year-old man with an 8-year history of CML was diagnosed as advanced EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma. Complete molecular response of CML had been achieved by imatinib, and ABL-TKI had been switched to nilotinib four years previously due to muscle cramps. We discontinued nilotinib and started afatinib. Although partial response of lung adenocarcinoma was achieved, cytogenetic relapse of CML was observed following nilotinib discontinuation. We applied the previously described framework of cytochrome P450 3A4-mediated oral drug-drug interactions and selected gefitinib and nilotinib to treat both malignancies. We effectively and safely administered this combination for seven months. The present report is the first to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of dual EGFR and ABL TKI treatment in a patient with concomitant EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma and CML.


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 3099-3099 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ingmar Glauche ◽  
Hendrik Liebscher ◽  
Christoph Baldow ◽  
Matthias Kuhn ◽  
Philipp Schulze ◽  
...  

Abstract Predicting minimal residual disease (MRD) levels in tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-treated chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients is of major clinical relevance. The reason is that residual leukemic (stem) cells are the source for both, potential relapses of the leukemicclone but also for its clonal evolution and, therefore, for the occurrence of resistance. The state-of-the art method for monitoring MRD in TKI-treated CML is the quantification of BCR-ABL levels in the peripheral blood (PB) by PCR. However, the question is whether BCR-ABL levels in the PB can be used as a reliable estimate for residual leukemic cells at the level of hematopoietic stem cells in the bone marrow (BM). Moreover, once the BCR-ABL levels have been reduced to undetectable levels, information on treatment kinetics is censored by the PCR detection limit. Clearly, BCR-ABL negativity in the PB suggests very low levels of residual disease also in the BM, but whether the MRD level remains at a constant level or decreases further cannot be read from the BCR-ABL negativity itself. Thus, also the prediction of a suitable time point for treatment cessation based on residual disease levels cannot be obtained from PCR monitoring in the PB and currently remains a heuristic decision. To overcome the current lack of a suitable biomarker for residual disease levels in the BM, we propose the application of a computational approach to quantitatively describe and predict long-term BCR-ABL levels. The underlying mathematical model has previously been validated by the comparison to more than 500 long-term BCR-ABL kinetics in the PB from different clinical trials under continuous TKI-treatment [1,2,3]. Here, we present results that show how this computational approach can be used to estimate MRD levels in the BM based on the measurements in the PB. Our results demonstrate that the mathematical model can quantitatively reproduce the cumulative incidence of the loss of deep and major molecular response in a population of patients, as published by Mahon et al. [4] and Rousselot et al. [5]. Furthermore, to demonstrate how the model can be used to predict the BCR-ABL levels and to estimate the molecular relapse probability of individual patients, we compare simulation results with more than 70 individual BCR-ABL-kinetics. For this analysis we use patient data from different clinical studies (e.g. EURO-SKI: NCT01596114, STIM(s): NCT00478985, NCT01343173) where TKI-treatment had been stopped after prolonged deep molecular response periods. Specifically, we propose to combine statistical (non-linear regression) and mechanistic (agent-based) modelling techniques, which allows us to quantify the reliability of model predictions by confidence regions based on the quality (i.e. number and variance) of the clinical measurements and on the particular kinetic response characteristics of individual patients. The proposed approach has the potential to support clinical decision making because it provides quantitative, patient-specific predictions of the treatment response together with a confidence measure, which allows to judge the amount of information that is provided by the theoretical prediction. References [1] Roeder et al. (2006) Dynamic modeling of imatinib-treated chronic myeloid leukemia: functional insights and clinical implications, Nat Med 12(10):1181-4 [2] Horn et al. (2013) Model-based decision rules reduce the risk of molecular relapse after cessation of tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy in chronic myeloid leukemia, Blood 121(2):378-84. [3] Glauche et al. (2014) Model-Based Characterization of the Molecular Response Dynamics of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (TKI)-Treated CML Patients a Comparison of Imatinib and Dasatinib First-Line Therapy, Blood 124:4562 [4] Mahon et al. (2010) Discontinuation of imatinib in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia who have maintained complete molecular remission for at least 2 years: the prospective, multicentre Stop Imatinib (STIM) trial. Lancet Oncol 11(11):1029-35 [5] Rousselot 
et al. (2014) Loss of major molecular response as a trigger for restarting TKI therapy in patients with CP- CML who have stopped Imatinib after durable undetectable disease, JCO 32(5):424-431 Disclosures Glauche: Bristol Meyer Squib: Research Funding. von Bubnoff:Amgen: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria. Saussele:ARIAD: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Other: Travel grants, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Other: Travel grants; BMS: Honoraria, Other: Travel grants, Research Funding. Mustjoki:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Ariad: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding. Guilhot:CELEGENE: Consultancy. Mahon:NOVARTIS PHARMA: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria; PFIZER: Honoraria; ARIAD: Honoraria. Roeder:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding.


2013 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. e2014009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ibrahim C. Haznedaroglu

The aim of oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is to get ideal hematological, cytogenetic, molecular responses at the critical time-points. The depth of the response obtained with TKI and time to achieve this response are important for the prediction of prognosis in the patient with CML. The high efficacy of the TKI treatment of CML has prompted the need for accurate methods to monitor response at levels below the landmark of CCyR. Quantification of BCR-ABL transcripts has proven to be the most sensitive method available and has shown prognostic impact with regard to progression-free survival. European LeukemiaNet (ELN) molecular program harmonized the reporting of results according to the IS (Internatıonal harmonization of Scale) in Europe. The aim of this review is to outline monitoring the response to optimal TKI treatment based on the ELN CML 2013 recommendations from the clinical point of view as a physician. Careful cytogenetic and molecular monitoring could help selecting the most convenient TKI drug and to optimize TKI treatment. Excessive monitoring may have an economical cost but failure to optimize TKI treatment may result in CML disease acceleration and death.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document