AB237. 3. Endoscopic findings of patients reporting with upper gastrointestinal symptoms—a study of 2,412 cases at Red Crescent General Hospital Sukkur and at Ghulam Muhammad Mahar Medical College Hospital Sukkur

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. AB237-AB237
Author(s):  
Syed Nouman Mohsin ◽  
Usman Nisar
2011 ◽  
Vol 50 (13) ◽  
pp. 1357-1363 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noriaki Manabe ◽  
Ken Haruma ◽  
Tomoari Kamada ◽  
Hiroaki Kusunoki ◽  
Kazuhiko Inoue ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Anne-Marie Barron ◽  
Jenna Moran ◽  
Shabnam Sultana Nina ◽  
Jason Harlow ◽  
Meena Gyawali ◽  
...  

In 2012, the Minister of Health and other leaders in the Bangladesh government approached Massachusetts General Hospital to establish the country’s first bone marrow transplant program at Dhaka Medical College Hospital to serve the needs of the people of Bangladesh. Stated goals of this collaboration included a broad focus on the care of oncology patients with a specific emphasis on care of patients with hematologic malignancies and of women with gynecologic cancers. The purpose of this article is to describe the international nursing collaboration between Massachusetts General Hospital, Simmons College, the AK Khan Healthcare Trust in Dhaka, and Dhaka Medical College Hospital that was established to share nursing knowledge and to build specialized professional nursing capacities to deliver high-quality cancer care in the public sector. Over the past 3 years, through the educational programs that have been developed within this collaboration—the Enhanced Specialized Nurse Training Program—the Bangladeshi nurses have received continuing professional development based on Western standards of nursing and have been offering nursing care to patients who have undergone chemotherapy and bone marrow transplantation. The challenges, opportunities, and outcomes of this international collaboration have been highly rewarding and mutually beneficial.


2000 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 463-463 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sergio Sartori ◽  
Lucio Trevisani ◽  
Ingrid Nielsen ◽  
Davide Tassinari ◽  
Ilaria Panzini ◽  
...  

PURPOSE: Anticancer drugs may induce acute mucosal injury to stomach and duodenum. This study was planned to evaluate the efficacy of omeprazole or ranitidine in preventing such an injury.PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred twenty-eight cancer patients with normal stomach and duodenum or with less than three erosions, who were selected to be treated with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (90 breast carcinoma patients) or fluorouracil alone (138 colon carcinoma patients), were randomly assigned to treatment with omeprazole 20 mg, ranitidine 300 mg, or one placebo tablet a day. Seven days after the second course of chemotherapy (CT), the patients underwent a further esophagogastroduodenoscopy to evaluate the mucosal injury. Endoscopic findings were quantified on the basis of an arbitrary score, and the occurrence of epigastric pain or heartburn was assessed weekly.RESULTS: A significant difference was found among the three groups (P = .0032), as well as between pre- and postCT endoscopic findings (P = .00001). Endoscopic scores after CT were significantly higher than pretreatment scores in the placebo (P = .003) and ranitidine (P = .003) groups but not in the omeprazole group (P = .354). Acute ulcers were significantly less frequent in patients receiving omeprazole or ranitidine than in those receiving placebo (P = .0001 and P = .0315, respectively). Epigastric pain and/or heartburn were significantly less frequent in patients receiving omeprazole (P = .00124) or ranitidine (P = .038) than in those receiving placebo.CONCLUSION: Omeprazole is effective in preventing chemotherapy-induced gastroduodenal injury. Ranitidine is effective in reducing the frequency of ulcers and upper gastrointestinal symptoms but is not effective in preventing the global endoscopic worsening caused by chemotherapy. The different efficacy of omeprazole and ranitidine can be explained by their different pharmacodynamics.


2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 110-117
Author(s):  
Md Mahmudul Islam ◽  
Khondkar AK Azad ◽  
Md Aminul Islam ◽  
Rivu Raj Chakraborty

Background: Chest trauma is responsible for 50% of deaths due to trauma. This kind of death usually occurs immediately after the trauma has occurred. Various therapeutic options have been reported for management of chest injuries like clinical observation, thoracocentesis, tube thoracostomy and open thoracotomy. Objective: To observe the pattern and outcome of management in chest trauma Methods: This is an observational study carried out in Casualty department of Chittagong Medical College Hospital (CMCH), Chittagong, between April 2015 to March 2016. Our study was included all patients, both sexes, following chest injury at Casualty units of Chittagong Medical College Hospital. All the data were recorded through the preformed data collection sheet and analyzed. Result: The mean age was found 37.7±18.1 years with range from 12 to 80 years. Male female ratio was 11.8:1. The mean time elapsed after trauma was found 6.1±3.1 hours with range from 1 to 72 hours. Almost one third (35.7%) patients was affecting road traffic accident followed by 42(27.3%) assault, 35(22.7%) stab injury, 15(9.7%) fall and 7(4.5%) gun shot . More than three fourth (80.5%) patients were managed by tube thoracostomy followed by 28(18.2%) observation and 2(1.3%) ventilatory support. No thoracotomy was done in emergency department. 42(27.2%) patients was found open pneumothorax followed by 41(26.6%) rib fracture, 31(20.1%) haemopneumothorax, 14(9%) simple pneumothorax, 12(7.8%) haemothorax, 6(3.9%) chest wall injury, 5(3.2%) tension pneumothorax, and 3(1.9%) flail chest. About the side of tube 60(39.0%) patients were given tube on left side followed by 57(37.0%) patients on right side, 9(5.8%) patients on both (left & right) side and 28(18.2%) patients needed no tube. Regarding the complications, 13(30%) patients had persistent haemothorax followed by 12(29%)tubes were placed outside triangle of safety, 6(13.9%) tubes were kinked, 6(13.9%) patients developed port side infection, 2(4.5%)tube was placed too shallow, 2(4.5%) patients developed empyema thoracis and 2(4.5%) patients developed bronchopleural fistula. The mean ICT removal information was found 8.8±3.6 days with range from 4 to 18 days. Reinsertion of ICT was done in 6(4.7%) patients. More than two third (68.2%) patients were recovered well, 43(27.9%) patients developed complication and 6(3.9%)patients died. More than two third (66.9%) patients had length of hospital stay 11-20 days. Conclusion: Most of the patients were in 3rd decade and male predominant. Road traffic accident and tube thoracostomy were more common. Open pneumothorax, rib fracture and haemopneumothorax were commonest injuries. Nearly one third of the patients had developed complications. Re-insertion of ICT needed almost five percent and death almost four percent. Journal of Surgical Sciences (2018) Vol. 22 (2) : 110-117


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document