scholarly journals AB045. SOH21AS211. Systematic review on the incidence and management of endovenous heat induced thrombosis (EHIT) following endovenous thermal ablation of the great saphenous vein

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. AB045-AB045
Author(s):  
Mark Aidan Twyford ◽  
Donagh Healy ◽  
Micheal Anthony Moloney ◽  
Eamon Gerard Kavanagh
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Saphenous Vein ◽  
Thermal Ablation ◽  
Great Saphenous Vein ◽  
Endovenous Thermal Ablation

Review of Endovenous Thermal Ablation of the Great Saphenous Vein

2018 ◽  
Vol 44 (5) ◽  
pp. 679-688 ◽  
Author(s):  
Omeed Ahadiat ◽  
Shauna Higgins ◽  
Alexandre Ly ◽  
Azadeh Nazemi ◽  
Ashley Wysong
Keyword(s):  
Saphenous Vein ◽  
Thermal Ablation ◽  
Great Saphenous Vein ◽  
Endovenous Thermal Ablation

scholarly journals Endovenous Ablation of Varicose Veins Experience at Tertiary Neurological Center

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 94-96
Author(s):  
Sandeep Raj Pandey ◽  
George Bush Jung Katwal ◽  
Sharad Hari Gajuryal
Keyword(s):  
Saphenous Vein ◽  
Thermal Ablation ◽  
Great Saphenous Vein ◽  
Varicose Veins ◽  
Duplex Ultrasound ◽  
Normal Activity ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Endovenous Thermal Ablation

Introduction: Endovascular ablation of varicose vein either by radiofrequency ablationor laser delivers sufficient thermal energy to incompetent vein segments to produce irreversible occlusion, fibrosis and ultimately disappearance of the vein.Materials and Methods: Three hundred patients with varicosities due to primary or recurrent sapheno-femoral or sapheno-popliteal junction and great or small saphenous veinreflux underwent out-patient and in-patient endovenous thermal ablation between January 2015 to December 2017.The great saphenous vein was ablated from 2-2.5 cm below sapheno-femoral junction to knee and the small saphenous vein was ablated from mid-calf to the sapheno-popliteal junction.Results: Patient returning time to normal activity was 0–1 days returning to normal daily activity were immediately after 4 hours. Duplex ultrasound follow-up (median 3-months) confirmed abolition of sapheno-femoral junction/great saphenous vein and sapheno-popliteal junction/small saphenous vein reflux in all limbs. There were no instances of skin burns or deep vein thrombosis, but, 7 patients developed transient cutaneous numbness involving sural nerve and 1 developed endovenous heat induced thrombosis 3.Conclusions: This is likely to be more effective than conventional surgery, although long-term follow up is required.  Despite being expensive in comparison to open surgery, endovenous thermal ablation is superior in terms of: minimizing pain, avoiding incision, early mobilisation and discharge. Changing the treatment distance from 2 cm to 2.5 cm peripheral to the Deep veins junction may result in a diminished incidence of endovenous heat induced thrombosis 3.

scholarly journals Effects of Two Current Great Saphenous Vein Thermal Ablation Methods on Visual Analog Scale and Quality of Life

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soner Sanioglu ◽  
Halit Yerebakan ◽  
Mustafa Bora Farsak
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Fiber Laser ◽  
Saphenous Vein ◽  
Thermal Ablation ◽  
Great Saphenous Vein ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Analog Scale ◽  
Radial Fiber ◽  
Endovenous Thermal Ablation

Background. The aim of the study is to compare the current two endovenous thermal ablation methods by examining the effects on the visual analog scale (VAS) and the short form-36® quality of life index. Methods. Ninety-six patients who underwent unilateral endovenous thermal ablation of great saphenous vein were included. ClosureFast™ catheters were used in the RFA group and 1470 nm radial fiber laser catheters were used in the EVLA group. Results. The RFA group consisted of 41 patients and the EVLA group consisted of 55 patients. The preoperative baseline characteristics of both groups were similar. On the day of operation, VAS values were 2.8±1.1 in the RFA group and 3.6±1.8 in the EVLA group (p=0.02). Comparisons of short form-36 parameters in both groups showed them to be similar except the pain detected at postoperative 1st week (48.1±5.4 for RFA, 44.9±7.6 for EVLA, p=0.04). Conclusion. Results in postprocedural quality of life were found to be similar in both of the techniques. However, in terms of postoperative pain, radiofrequency ablation is still superior to the 1470 nm radial fiber laser catheters.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document