scholarly journals The optimal sequence for bronchial brushing and forceps biopsy in lung cancer diagnosis: a random control study

2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 520-526 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gang Hou ◽  
Yuan Miao ◽  
Xue-Jun Hu ◽  
Wei Wang ◽  
Qiu-Yue Wang ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Cecilia Mouronte-Roibás ◽  
Virginia Leiro-Fernández ◽  
Alberto Ruano-Raviña ◽  
Cristina Ramos-Hernández ◽  
Pedro Casado-Rey ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (11) ◽  
pp. 6100-6108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Wu ◽  
Larry A. Pierce ◽  
Yuzheng Zhang ◽  
Sudhakar N. J. Pipavath ◽  
Timothy W. Randolph ◽  
...  

Medicina ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 57 (4) ◽  
pp. 393
Author(s):  
Mărioara Simon ◽  
Ioan Simon ◽  
Paul Andrei Tent ◽  
Doina Adina Todea ◽  
Antonia Haranguș

Optimizing the diagnosis of lung cancer represents a challenge, as well as a necessity, for improving the low survival of these patients. Flexible bronchoscopy with forceps biopsy is one of the key diagnostic procedures used for lung tumors. The small sample size and crush artifacts are several factors that can often limit access to a complete diagnosis, therefore leading to the need of repeating the bronchoscopy procedure or other invasive diagnostic methods. The bronchoscopic cryobiopsy is a recent technique that proved its utility in the diagnosis of both endobronchial and peripheral lung tumors. In comparison with conventional forceps biopsy, studies report a higher diagnostic yield and a superior quality of the collected samples for both the histopathological and the molecular diagnosis of lung cancer. This method shows promising results in sampling lung tissue, alone, or in conjunction with fluoroscopy or radial endobronchial ultrasound (r-EBUS). With a good safety and cost-benefit profile, this novel method has the potential to improve the diagnosis, and therefore the management of lung cancer patients. The objective of this narrative review is to provide a comprehensive review of the recent data regarding the advantages of cryobiopsy and r-EBUS in lung cancer diagnosis.


2018 ◽  
Vol 52 (03) ◽  
pp. 134-141
Author(s):  
Chia-Jui Tsai ◽  
Wei-Che Chiu ◽  
Chia-Ju Chen ◽  
Pau-Chung Chen ◽  
Roger McIntyre ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction In recent decades, concern about safety of antidepressants has been raised but the risk between antidepressants and lung cancer has not yet been established. Methods A case-control study was conducted by using a nationwide database in Taiwan. The case groups were new onset lung cancer diagnosis during 1999–2008 and age- and gender-matched controls were selected among those without any cancer. The cumulative exposure dose before the lung cancer diagnosis was added and risks were calculated according to the levels of defined daily dose and classes of antidepressants. Results A total of 39,001 individuals with lung cancer and 189,906 individuals without lung cancer between 1999 and 2008 were included in the analysis. Antidepressants, of any class, were not associated with elevated risks for lung cancer with the exception of bupropion at high exposure levels (odds ratio=4.81, 95% confidence interval=1.39–16.71). Discussion Antidepressant prescription was not associated with elevation of lung cancer incidence using a nationally representative sample. The elevated risk for lung cancer with bupropion at high doses may be a bias by indication and warrant longitudinal investigation.


2010 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 242 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ersin Gunay ◽  
NevinTaci Hoca ◽  
Aydin Yilmaz ◽  
Funda Demirag ◽  
Sibel Gunay ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peng Zhang ◽  
Xinnan Xu ◽  
Hongwei Wang ◽  
Yuanli Feng ◽  
Haozhe Feng ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 238 (5) ◽  
pp. 395-421 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolas R. Ziebarth

Abstract This paper empirically investigates biased beliefs about the risks of smoking. First, it confirms the established tendency of people to overestimate the lifetime risk of a smoker to contract lung cancer. In this paper’s survey, almost half of all respondents overestimate this risk. However, 80% underestimate lung cancer deadliness. In reality, less than one in five patients survive five years after a lung cancer diagnosis. Due to the broad underestimation of the lung cancer deadliness, the lifetime risk of a smoker to die of lung cancer is underestimated by almost half of all respondents. Smokers who do not plan to quit are significantly more likely to underestimate this overall mortality risk.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document